This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Please have someone besides the originating editor assess the article beyond C class. Thanks. Also, is this a fictional organization like
Team Rocket or just a group of characters? Should the infobox be changed appropriately?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This seems closer to start class than anything. And while I won't personally push for it alone, I really don't think this would survive an AFD or merge discussion by
WP:VG. The reception section is rather short, and mostly consists of passing comments pulled from article about other things, like their game reviews or comments about the series itself. It looks a lot like all the Sonic articles that were merged years back.
Sergecross73msg me13:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This is my first character article, and I didn't really have another article to base it on, so I think that's why it doesn't look too good. However, I've looked back to the merger discussions from 2014 and I think that this is a different case. The IGN, Destructoid, and Sega Magazine articles are all about them, and there's a good deal of information I'm yet to implement. I'm tagging the reception section as incomplete for now, until I expand it. The reason I assessed it as a B-class article is because the creation and appearances sections are pretty good, but that's just my opinion.
JOEBRO6420:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)reply
I very much disagree that the article should be a start class article, it seems quite well written. If you can prove that it has notability, and I'd say from the sources that it does; then the article is well written. With it being a small topic, the information on offer seems to be quite large. In terms of a B class rating, I think it's between C and B, with the reception section just needing better wording for a B. The article rating system is designed for how well the information is displayed, and if the information is full. Not on the topic of the article.
Lee Vilenski(
talk)
11:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Please have someone besides the originating editor assess the article beyond C class. Thanks. Also, is this a fictional organization like
Team Rocket or just a group of characters? Should the infobox be changed appropriately?
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This seems closer to start class than anything. And while I won't personally push for it alone, I really don't think this would survive an AFD or merge discussion by
WP:VG. The reception section is rather short, and mostly consists of passing comments pulled from article about other things, like their game reviews or comments about the series itself. It looks a lot like all the Sonic articles that were merged years back.
Sergecross73msg me13:41, 4 December 2017 (UTC)reply
This is my first character article, and I didn't really have another article to base it on, so I think that's why it doesn't look too good. However, I've looked back to the merger discussions from 2014 and I think that this is a different case. The IGN, Destructoid, and Sega Magazine articles are all about them, and there's a good deal of information I'm yet to implement. I'm tagging the reception section as incomplete for now, until I expand it. The reason I assessed it as a B-class article is because the creation and appearances sections are pretty good, but that's just my opinion.
JOEBRO6420:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)reply
I very much disagree that the article should be a start class article, it seems quite well written. If you can prove that it has notability, and I'd say from the sources that it does; then the article is well written. With it being a small topic, the information on offer seems to be quite large. In terms of a B class rating, I think it's between C and B, with the reception section just needing better wording for a B. The article rating system is designed for how well the information is displayed, and if the information is full. Not on the topic of the article.
Lee Vilenski(
talk)
11:33, 5 December 2017 (UTC)reply