![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Chancas from es.wikipedia. |
The following passage runs like completely nonsensical gibberish
I have chosen to remove it as it is grammatically incoherent and lends nothing of value to improve the quality of the article. 67.142.172.27 ( talk) 03:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I have translated from the Spanish version as far as it made sense. There a couple of minor points that need checking. I will be back to do more linking, but carry on anybody if you want. Richard Avery ( talk) 11:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chanka people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
There should be some citation or source justifying:
1. That this claim in particular is a deliberate piece of false propoganda by enemies of the Spanish colonialists such as the Dutch or British.
2. That there was in fact no slavery or encomienda-like forced labor system implemented for these people.
3. That we aren't just contributing to the Spanish imperialist "white legend" by dismissing this as the "Black Legend."
4. Maybe a citation or source here? The entire Viceroyalty of Peru section has no citations while making rather bold claims about a deliberate conspiracy against the Spanish empire and dismissing criticism of the Spanish empire as propoganda. I would say that sort of thing should absolutely have a citation
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.237.249.230 (
talk)
08:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have put this tag here because of the discussion around the Viceroyalty of Peru, which makes the unsupported claim that there was no mistreatment of the Chankas or other Indigenous groups. As explained by a researcher at St Andrews, this does not fit what actually happened: Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/stories/2016/the-chankas/.
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Chancas from es.wikipedia. |
The following passage runs like completely nonsensical gibberish
I have chosen to remove it as it is grammatically incoherent and lends nothing of value to improve the quality of the article. 67.142.172.27 ( talk) 03:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I have translated from the Spanish version as far as it made sense. There a couple of minor points that need checking. I will be back to do more linking, but carry on anybody if you want. Richard Avery ( talk) 11:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chanka people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:02, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
There should be some citation or source justifying:
1. That this claim in particular is a deliberate piece of false propoganda by enemies of the Spanish colonialists such as the Dutch or British.
2. That there was in fact no slavery or encomienda-like forced labor system implemented for these people.
3. That we aren't just contributing to the Spanish imperialist "white legend" by dismissing this as the "Black Legend."
4. Maybe a citation or source here? The entire Viceroyalty of Peru section has no citations while making rather bold claims about a deliberate conspiracy against the Spanish empire and dismissing criticism of the Spanish empire as propoganda. I would say that sort of thing should absolutely have a citation
— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
71.237.249.230 (
talk)
08:23, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
I have put this tag here because of the discussion around the Viceroyalty of Peru, which makes the unsupported claim that there was no mistreatment of the Chankas or other Indigenous groups. As explained by a researcher at St Andrews, this does not fit what actually happened: Cite error: There are <ref>
tags on this page without content in them (see the
help page).
https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/stories/2016/the-chankas/.