This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Should not be merged. This is a perfectly good topic in its own right. Charles Matthews 19:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
No, really, why? It is good to have articles on typical constructions such as Vietoris topology and Fell topology and Zariski topology and this one. Examples of topologies tend to be illustrative, a source of countexamples and so on; i.e. mostly of pedagogic value. Where there is going to be a need for someone to use WP as a reference (definitely the case for this one), an article is justified. Charles Matthews 11:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Should not be merged. This is a perfectly good topic in its own right. Charles Matthews 19:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
No, really, why? It is good to have articles on typical constructions such as Vietoris topology and Fell topology and Zariski topology and this one. Examples of topologies tend to be illustrative, a source of countexamples and so on; i.e. mostly of pedagogic value. Where there is going to be a need for someone to use WP as a reference (definitely the case for this one), an article is justified. Charles Matthews 11:22, 3 June 2007 (UTC)