![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this still being published? The website for this organisation only lists it to 2012. Serpren ( talk) 07:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment moved from article -- Ferkelparade π 14:31, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
(Very POV) British Troops stationed in Britain are not military occupation. Could say the same about Scotland Wales and Cornwall. French military in Brittany? - User:217.225.25.11
The nations cited in this article speck a 'Celtic' language. Very few of the people themselves are of Celtic descent. Fergananim.
Which sounds a bit odd to me, since that article should be about Celtic nationalism as a whole, not this one singular (although very notable) organisation. As such, I'm going to fork it into a new page. - [unsigned]
"the return of ancient artifacts, removed by the French and British authorities to their own museums."
This makes no sense at all. Scotland, Cornwall and Wales are British. Authorities in these places are British authorities. Is the author meaning to say non-Cornish English? Removed to their own museums, does that mean removed to England? Removed from where? At the British Museum, many Celtic artefacts are from England - should they be sent by right to museums in Scotland or Wales?
The line implies through saying Britain to mean England. Therefore it proposes that England is not Celtic. The basis for being Celtic is a Celtic language. The artefacts are from a time before the current political divisions of Britain, when there were numerous other kingdoms. Therefore the line in question is irrelevant and shows a militancy that reveals an ignorance in those that would see such action taken, and thus does a disservice to this article, unless of course this article is about a group of crackpots and thugs.
What should be said is that artefacts from the Celtic period have been removed from what are now considered to be Celtic countries and are on display in museums in England, and that really annoys us because we have no life, so we want to get them back and then find something else to moan about. Enzedbrit 22:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: "that really annoys us because we have no life, so we want to get them back and then find something else to moan about."
Speak for yourself. You've been banging on with the same lines, on usenet and elsewhere for over ten years. Tend to your own house. --
MacRusgail
16:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Why is England not considered one of these nations? I know it's been invaded quite a few times, but the celtic routes are still quite apprent in England even today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.130.209 ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Image:CelticLeagueLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I tidied this article recently, creating fresh wikilinks, reducing the excessive linking to others, e.g. the Celtic nations article, and removing unnecessary capitalisation. My edits have been reverted no less than three times, all without explanation. I'd like one.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 11:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
"Maybe"? You ought to know, you've done it twice already! Instead of adding two letters, you revert dozens of improving edits? I'm underwhelmed.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 08:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
That's a disgustingly dishonest characterisation of my edits, MacRusgail, and a very weak justification for your own. Wise up.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 10:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not feeding you anymore, Mac.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 08:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm restoring the notability tag until such times as notability is justified and reasonable third-party sources are provided for this organisation. I have stopped short of applying a deletion tag, although I think that will likely be the appropriate end for this article. -- Breadandcheese ( talk) 03:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Other references -
Might it be advisable to reorder either the various titles of the organisation ('Ar Kevre Keltiek'...) or the list of languages so that the languages in each match up? 86.140.193.129 ( talk) 20:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not happy with this has been a couple of clicks away from major country articles, like Wales. Does this actually pass WP:WEB? It should be up for deletion if not. Wikipedia is not simply webspace for everything out there. It has particular inclusion rules (see WP:notability, WP:not, WP:sources etc). Matt Lewis ( talk) 23:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I rather forgot about this one. The flag of the Republic of Ireland is the tricolour. It is not the flag of the island of Ireland. It should not be presented as such in an encyclopaedia. Seems very simple to me. As the list would look somewhat silly with one flag removed, I'm simply going to remove all flags. -- Breadandcheese ( talk) 00:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
The flags are staying if unsatisified with the tricolour post your reasons why,and put forward what flag should be used instead.This article will not be affected by the mundane and asinine political viewpoints of a select few people. Sheodred ( talk) 16:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that CLAB still publishes One Nation, One Soul or even exists at all. Their website is gone. Contact info I can find does not include a phone number, and the online info dates to back when Prodigy (the online service) was still around. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 06:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
The Shetland islands are shown within these nations. Shetlanders are of Norse origin and do not consider themselves to be Scots. If Cornwall, within the current legal juradiction of England, is considered a celtic nation then surely the same principle would mean the Sheltands would be granted the same consideration in terms of a Nordic part of Scotland? Dainamo ( talk) 09:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. As Bejnar notes though, moving the dab page is unnecessary – it can simply be deleted. Jenks24 ( talk) 16:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
– The UN-recognized international organization founded in 1961 makes sense as the primary topic. The rugby competition hasn't been known by this name in years, and changes name frequently (it's had at least 4 names, presently Guinness Pro12) and is usually referred to as the Pro12. References to the rugby thing as "Celtic League" are rarely found outside obsolete sports-specialized sources. The only other entry on the disambiguation page is an ice hockey event known as the Celtic League Cup, not the Celtic League. Also, the disambiguation "(political organisation)" isn't accurate, as the Celtic League is principally a language and culture preservation organisation, and engages in few direct political activities at all. If it were not moved to Celtic League, it should be renamed Celtic League (cultural organisation) or perhaps simply Celtic Leangue (organisation). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 11:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Celtic League. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is this still being published? The website for this organisation only lists it to 2012. Serpren ( talk) 07:05, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Comment moved from article -- Ferkelparade π 14:31, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
(Very POV) British Troops stationed in Britain are not military occupation. Could say the same about Scotland Wales and Cornwall. French military in Brittany? - User:217.225.25.11
The nations cited in this article speck a 'Celtic' language. Very few of the people themselves are of Celtic descent. Fergananim.
Which sounds a bit odd to me, since that article should be about Celtic nationalism as a whole, not this one singular (although very notable) organisation. As such, I'm going to fork it into a new page. - [unsigned]
"the return of ancient artifacts, removed by the French and British authorities to their own museums."
This makes no sense at all. Scotland, Cornwall and Wales are British. Authorities in these places are British authorities. Is the author meaning to say non-Cornish English? Removed to their own museums, does that mean removed to England? Removed from where? At the British Museum, many Celtic artefacts are from England - should they be sent by right to museums in Scotland or Wales?
The line implies through saying Britain to mean England. Therefore it proposes that England is not Celtic. The basis for being Celtic is a Celtic language. The artefacts are from a time before the current political divisions of Britain, when there were numerous other kingdoms. Therefore the line in question is irrelevant and shows a militancy that reveals an ignorance in those that would see such action taken, and thus does a disservice to this article, unless of course this article is about a group of crackpots and thugs.
What should be said is that artefacts from the Celtic period have been removed from what are now considered to be Celtic countries and are on display in museums in England, and that really annoys us because we have no life, so we want to get them back and then find something else to moan about. Enzedbrit 22:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Re: "that really annoys us because we have no life, so we want to get them back and then find something else to moan about."
Speak for yourself. You've been banging on with the same lines, on usenet and elsewhere for over ten years. Tend to your own house. --
MacRusgail
16:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Why is England not considered one of these nations? I know it's been invaded quite a few times, but the celtic routes are still quite apprent in England even today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.130.209 ( talk • contribs) 14:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Image:CelticLeagueLogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I tidied this article recently, creating fresh wikilinks, reducing the excessive linking to others, e.g. the Celtic nations article, and removing unnecessary capitalisation. My edits have been reverted no less than three times, all without explanation. I'd like one.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 11:44, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
"Maybe"? You ought to know, you've done it twice already! Instead of adding two letters, you revert dozens of improving edits? I'm underwhelmed.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 08:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
That's a disgustingly dishonest characterisation of my edits, MacRusgail, and a very weak justification for your own. Wise up.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 10:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm not feeding you anymore, Mac.
Lapsed Pacifist ( talk) 08:59, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm restoring the notability tag until such times as notability is justified and reasonable third-party sources are provided for this organisation. I have stopped short of applying a deletion tag, although I think that will likely be the appropriate end for this article. -- Breadandcheese ( talk) 03:18, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Other references -
Might it be advisable to reorder either the various titles of the organisation ('Ar Kevre Keltiek'...) or the list of languages so that the languages in each match up? 86.140.193.129 ( talk) 20:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not happy with this has been a couple of clicks away from major country articles, like Wales. Does this actually pass WP:WEB? It should be up for deletion if not. Wikipedia is not simply webspace for everything out there. It has particular inclusion rules (see WP:notability, WP:not, WP:sources etc). Matt Lewis ( talk) 23:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
I rather forgot about this one. The flag of the Republic of Ireland is the tricolour. It is not the flag of the island of Ireland. It should not be presented as such in an encyclopaedia. Seems very simple to me. As the list would look somewhat silly with one flag removed, I'm simply going to remove all flags. -- Breadandcheese ( talk) 00:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
The flags are staying if unsatisified with the tricolour post your reasons why,and put forward what flag should be used instead.This article will not be affected by the mundane and asinine political viewpoints of a select few people. Sheodred ( talk) 16:06, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I can't find any evidence that CLAB still publishes One Nation, One Soul or even exists at all. Their website is gone. Contact info I can find does not include a phone number, and the online info dates to back when Prodigy (the online service) was still around. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 06:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
The Shetland islands are shown within these nations. Shetlanders are of Norse origin and do not consider themselves to be Scots. If Cornwall, within the current legal juradiction of England, is considered a celtic nation then surely the same principle would mean the Sheltands would be granted the same consideration in terms of a Nordic part of Scotland? Dainamo ( talk) 09:14, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. As Bejnar notes though, moving the dab page is unnecessary – it can simply be deleted. Jenks24 ( talk) 16:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
– The UN-recognized international organization founded in 1961 makes sense as the primary topic. The rugby competition hasn't been known by this name in years, and changes name frequently (it's had at least 4 names, presently Guinness Pro12) and is usually referred to as the Pro12. References to the rugby thing as "Celtic League" are rarely found outside obsolete sports-specialized sources. The only other entry on the disambiguation page is an ice hockey event known as the Celtic League Cup, not the Celtic League. Also, the disambiguation "(political organisation)" isn't accurate, as the Celtic League is principally a language and culture preservation organisation, and engages in few direct political activities at all. If it were not moved to Celtic League, it should be renamed Celtic League (cultural organisation) or perhaps simply Celtic Leangue (organisation). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 11:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Celtic League. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:04, 8 January 2016 (UTC)