 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I reorganized the article so as to allow for easier updating. And I updated it a little. Lots of work to do on this. CountMacula ( talk) 02:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Ssybesma, please don't make changes like this - people in the Immigration Court system are not necessarily removable or "illegal aliens." Some are applicants for asylum, for example, who were referred to Immigration Court for adjudication. Neutrality talk 13:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
The tiny example of asylum is not enough to hold your point as it's a so-called "fact" that sits on the point of a pin compared to the people who are just running across the border.
Even those people are here illegally the very second they enter the country.
You ignore the elephant and focus on the flea.
I will not accept your polically-correct counsel...rather you should not be making changes to the fact those people are illegal aliens. Shame on you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssybesma ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- You've ignored my post above (and are incorrect on multiple levels), but you need to review Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, for a start. Neutrality talk 14:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
I reorganized the article so as to allow for easier updating. And I updated it a little. Lots of work to do on this. CountMacula ( talk) 02:39, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Ssybesma, please don't make changes like this - people in the Immigration Court system are not necessarily removable or "illegal aliens." Some are applicants for asylum, for example, who were referred to Immigration Court for adjudication. Neutrality talk 13:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
The tiny example of asylum is not enough to hold your point as it's a so-called "fact" that sits on the point of a pin compared to the people who are just running across the border.
Even those people are here illegally the very second they enter the country.
You ignore the elephant and focus on the flea.
I will not accept your polically-correct counsel...rather you should not be making changes to the fact those people are illegal aliens. Shame on you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssybesma ( talk • contribs) 13:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- You've ignored my post above (and are incorrect on multiple levels), but you need to review Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines, and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, for a start. Neutrality talk 14:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)