From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Mixed to negative reviews"?

As an author of one of the more positive reviews, I do not feel the "Reception" section adequately reflects the critical response to this game. The chart of review scores features only two (one positive, one negative) while the paragraph deals solely in negative quotes. I'm willing to concede my opinion might not be the majority, but praise for the game exists and I'm not the only one who recommends it. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub ( contributions) 00:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Most of the reviews on MetaCritic are positive. Varying reception is a better solution. The Phantomnaut ( talk) 08:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Mixed to negative reviews"?

As an author of one of the more positive reviews, I do not feel the "Reception" section adequately reflects the critical response to this game. The chart of review scores features only two (one positive, one negative) while the paragraph deals solely in negative quotes. I'm willing to concede my opinion might not be the majority, but praise for the game exists and I'm not the only one who recommends it. --Do Not Talk About Feitclub ( contributions) 00:02, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Most of the reviews on MetaCritic are positive. Varying reception is a better solution. The Phantomnaut ( talk) 08:31, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook