Castle Crashers has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
|
|
For future use in the article. -- Teancum ( talk) 23:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Guyinblack25 talk 17:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I did most of the B-class editing bringing it close to GAN, but someone else nominated it. I actually am no longer focused on getting GA-class articles, so I won't be making changes. I just wanted to notify other editors in case they check through the history. The prose updates and FUR expansions I have no problem with, but I have little desire to justify or replace questioned sources. I have definite opinions on whether certain sources are reliable but others disagree. I've posted rebuttals below though. -- Teancum ( talk) 21:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
The first YouTube video should be acceptable as it is just that – an interview. It may not necessarily come from a reliable source, but the interview occurred nonetheless. The only other question is whether or not this is Dan Paladin, which I would bank a month's pay that it is.
For the GamerVision one I found a link what would be their video on their website at [1], but I can't get the video to run; I'm sure that's from that URL, though. Anyways, I think they both should be acceptable as long as the material in the article is consistent with what is in the interview itself. – MuZemike 22:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Also, not to butt too much into the GA review itself, but ratings really shouldn't be mentioned in the article (if they have their own "Reception box" for that), especially in the lead. Readers aren't interested in seeing a whole bunch of numbers when they read the lead; it's better or have an overview of the reception of the game instead, without giving rating numbers. – MuZemike 22:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Let me know on these issues, and if you could take a quick reassess on current issues and mark out what's done that'd be awesome. -- Teancum ( talk) 13:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
The sales numbers are based off the number of players on the leaderboard in a list compiled by Gamasutra. In their stats they note that the totals for the XBLA sales are too high because any person who plays the game is on the leaderboard, whether or not they own it (playing it at a friends house would inflate these numbers)
Also, I couldn't even find the correct article being mentioned in Source #27, it just linked to a bunch of articles (maybe I didn't look hard enough).
Not sure if these are big deals, but the sales numbers are definitely inflated a little bit.
Tylerh1701 ( talk) 17:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3142014{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3152336&did=1{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/strategy/castlecrashers/video/6213888?sid=6213888{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.next-gen.biz/reviews/review-castle-crashers{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3169715&p=4{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3181189&p=37When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
What are the main fours names? 2603:7000:8B01:2322:8C38:C7EA:6C0B:5A5C ( talk) 03:50, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
In the "Development and Marketing" section of the article, the following line appears:
"Though the original Comic-Con 2005 demo was shown running on a GameCube, no mention has been made of a release on a Nintendo-based platform."
This is no longer correct as the game exists on Switch now. An easy solution could be changing "has" to "had" or simply eliminating the fact entirely or restructuring it to focus on the existence of a GameCube demo at Comic-Con 2005.
I don't know anything about wikipedia or its editing process, so I leave the fix to whomever else happens across this post. 2600:8807:8899:C700:5007:83C4:F685:1517 ( talk) 09:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
Castle Crashers has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
For future use in the article. -- Teancum ( talk) 23:57, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Guyinblack25 talk 17:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
I did most of the B-class editing bringing it close to GAN, but someone else nominated it. I actually am no longer focused on getting GA-class articles, so I won't be making changes. I just wanted to notify other editors in case they check through the history. The prose updates and FUR expansions I have no problem with, but I have little desire to justify or replace questioned sources. I have definite opinions on whether certain sources are reliable but others disagree. I've posted rebuttals below though. -- Teancum ( talk) 21:59, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
The first YouTube video should be acceptable as it is just that – an interview. It may not necessarily come from a reliable source, but the interview occurred nonetheless. The only other question is whether or not this is Dan Paladin, which I would bank a month's pay that it is.
For the GamerVision one I found a link what would be their video on their website at [1], but I can't get the video to run; I'm sure that's from that URL, though. Anyways, I think they both should be acceptable as long as the material in the article is consistent with what is in the interview itself. – MuZemike 22:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Also, not to butt too much into the GA review itself, but ratings really shouldn't be mentioned in the article (if they have their own "Reception box" for that), especially in the lead. Readers aren't interested in seeing a whole bunch of numbers when they read the lead; it's better or have an overview of the reception of the game instead, without giving rating numbers. – MuZemike 22:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Let me know on these issues, and if you could take a quick reassess on current issues and mark out what's done that'd be awesome. -- Teancum ( talk) 13:41, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
The sales numbers are based off the number of players on the leaderboard in a list compiled by Gamasutra. In their stats they note that the totals for the XBLA sales are too high because any person who plays the game is on the leaderboard, whether or not they own it (playing it at a friends house would inflate these numbers)
Also, I couldn't even find the correct article being mentioned in Source #27, it just linked to a bunch of articles (maybe I didn't look hard enough).
Not sure if these are big deals, but the sales numbers are definitely inflated a little bit.
Tylerh1701 ( talk) 17:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:56, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3142014{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/previewPage?cId=3152336&did=1{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/strategy/castlecrashers/video/6213888?sid=6213888{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.next-gen.biz/reviews/review-castle-crashers{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3169715&p=4{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3181189&p=37When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Castle Crashers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
What are the main fours names? 2603:7000:8B01:2322:8C38:C7EA:6C0B:5A5C ( talk) 03:50, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
In the "Development and Marketing" section of the article, the following line appears:
"Though the original Comic-Con 2005 demo was shown running on a GameCube, no mention has been made of a release on a Nintendo-based platform."
This is no longer correct as the game exists on Switch now. An easy solution could be changing "has" to "had" or simply eliminating the fact entirely or restructuring it to focus on the existence of a GameCube demo at Comic-Con 2005.
I don't know anything about wikipedia or its editing process, so I leave the fix to whomever else happens across this post. 2600:8807:8899:C700:5007:83C4:F685:1517 ( talk) 09:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)