![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Carrier frequency" should be seperate from "carrier wave". Let me know what you think. I also did a re-edit to bring the definition in line with that of NIST and CFR47. Fernblatt 03:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Mention
center frequency here because there is a very nice Wikipedia article about it here!
Believe it or not, certain
electromagnetic
communication systems have a center frequency but NOT a carrier frequency. Consider AM-double sideband-suppressed carrier. The absence of a carrier frequency is also true for nearly all FM communication systems and nearly all digital radio & microwave communication systems. The latter operate at top efficiency when the carrier component is suppressed all the way, and we go to great lengths to make them so.
D.A.W. - MSEE Georgia Tech 1980
98.67.163.16 (
talk)
19:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
It is problematic for this article to be a disambiguation page because the following restrictions apply to disambiguation pages:
Here are some options for improving things.
Please let us know your thoughts below. ~ Kvng ( talk) 23:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
We could also have content related to spectrum allocation. Also the use of carrier frequency in radio transmitters or receivers should be described. eg inserting a suppressed carrier for SSB reception. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 21:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
I think we definitely don't need both Carrier frequency and Carrier wave articles, they should be merged. There is only enough content for one article. I don't really care which is merged into which, but have a slight preference for Carrier wave. What do you think? -- Chetvorno TALK 03:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Carrier frequency" should be seperate from "carrier wave". Let me know what you think. I also did a re-edit to bring the definition in line with that of NIST and CFR47. Fernblatt 03:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Mention
center frequency here because there is a very nice Wikipedia article about it here!
Believe it or not, certain
electromagnetic
communication systems have a center frequency but NOT a carrier frequency. Consider AM-double sideband-suppressed carrier. The absence of a carrier frequency is also true for nearly all FM communication systems and nearly all digital radio & microwave communication systems. The latter operate at top efficiency when the carrier component is suppressed all the way, and we go to great lengths to make them so.
D.A.W. - MSEE Georgia Tech 1980
98.67.163.16 (
talk)
19:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
It is problematic for this article to be a disambiguation page because the following restrictions apply to disambiguation pages:
Here are some options for improving things.
Please let us know your thoughts below. ~ Kvng ( talk) 23:48, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
We could also have content related to spectrum allocation. Also the use of carrier frequency in radio transmitters or receivers should be described. eg inserting a suppressed carrier for SSB reception. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 21:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
I think we definitely don't need both Carrier frequency and Carrier wave articles, they should be merged. There is only enough content for one article. I don't really care which is merged into which, but have a slight preference for Carrier wave. What do you think? -- Chetvorno TALK 03:33, 2 March 2019 (UTC)