Recommend removing the in-line use of the cite book template, moving those to the bibliography, and just using the book's name in the body of the article.
Lead is lacking citations. For a living person, this is a requirement. Additional sources include a self-published CV by the subject of the article, this probably should be sourced elsewhere. Finally, the citations listed do not follow the
MOS for short citations.
There is minutiae in the article that is of questionable value, especially in regards to the conferences the author has participated in. Conference participation is a typical aspect of academic life, and would only be notable if the individual was a host or major presenter.
No apparent bias in the article as it is presented
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Very stable, but it has really only been authored by a single editor and was only created 4 months ago. Because it's so new, I'm hesitant to really call this stable.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
No images present in the article. An image of the person, images illustrating the person's field of study or place of study, home town, or subjects of the person's study would be helpful.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I unfortunately have to fail this right now. I would encourage a second reviewer to conduct a review, though. I have concerns that the article
does not meet notability requirements and could be subject to
deletion. As of right now, while the article is mostly written well and sourced, it is little more than a bibliography and a list of awards and achievements. For example, instead of just listed the grants the individual received, tell the reader what they did with those grants and what discoveries were made as a result of the studies conducted with the funds. Right now the article boils down to: Dr. Perucci is a professor who got some grants and contributed to some books. No reference is made to any articles she wrote. You can use the
Wikipedia Library to help search for more information on her research. Hope this helps!
Recommend removing the in-line use of the cite book template, moving those to the bibliography, and just using the book's name in the body of the article.
Lead is lacking citations. For a living person, this is a requirement. Additional sources include a self-published CV by the subject of the article, this probably should be sourced elsewhere. Finally, the citations listed do not follow the
MOS for short citations.
There is minutiae in the article that is of questionable value, especially in regards to the conferences the author has participated in. Conference participation is a typical aspect of academic life, and would only be notable if the individual was a host or major presenter.
No apparent bias in the article as it is presented
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Very stable, but it has really only been authored by a single editor and was only created 4 months ago. Because it's so new, I'm hesitant to really call this stable.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
No images present in the article. An image of the person, images illustrating the person's field of study or place of study, home town, or subjects of the person's study would be helpful.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I unfortunately have to fail this right now. I would encourage a second reviewer to conduct a review, though. I have concerns that the article
does not meet notability requirements and could be subject to
deletion. As of right now, while the article is mostly written well and sourced, it is little more than a bibliography and a list of awards and achievements. For example, instead of just listed the grants the individual received, tell the reader what they did with those grants and what discoveries were made as a result of the studies conducted with the funds. Right now the article boils down to: Dr. Perucci is a professor who got some grants and contributed to some books. No reference is made to any articles she wrote. You can use the
Wikipedia Library to help search for more information on her research. Hope this helps!