This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
How does wikipedia work? I think when you accuse the Carmelites of removing the dome from the church because it "disrupted Przmysl's Polish skyline" you must prove this with certainly not that I must prove it is not. I don't want to erase your work I only removed information because it is not sure (based only on 1 source?!?). what is a RFC? 23Michal ( talk) 23:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Then why is this information in only 1 source? 23Michal ( talk) 23:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Claiming that the Carmelites said that the dome disrupted Przmysl's "Polish" skyline is a very serious attack. It needs to be sourced very well. I will try to get opinion of other wikipedia writers on this situation. Is there was board for this type of discussion on wikipedia? 23Michal ( talk) 12:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
One source is "sourced very well"? I see you have a sense for humor. Btw I have noticed most pages on wikipedia have a talk page for discussion but the Carmelite Church does not have it, why is that? 23Michal ( talk) 13:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Not every piece of information requires more than one source for it, yes. But here is not normal piece of information. 23Michal ( talk) 18:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
In two days i tried hard to find sources for the claim "Carmelites of removing the dome from the church because it "disrupted Przmysl's Polish skyline" which is inserted into the article but i found nothing. 23Michal ( talk) 16:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Why do you continue just repeat that? Where are more sources? Or what was the source for Snyder. 23Michal ( talk) 23:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Why? Because I was unable to find any other source for that claim, that is why. 23Michal ( talk) 13:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I will check wikipedia rules. 23Michal ( talk) 14:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I requested a quote from the book, the term "Polish skyline" seems dubious, although i don't reject possibility that it was used. -- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 17:51, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carmelite Church, Przemyśl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
How does wikipedia work? I think when you accuse the Carmelites of removing the dome from the church because it "disrupted Przmysl's Polish skyline" you must prove this with certainly not that I must prove it is not. I don't want to erase your work I only removed information because it is not sure (based only on 1 source?!?). what is a RFC? 23Michal ( talk) 23:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Then why is this information in only 1 source? 23Michal ( talk) 23:34, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Claiming that the Carmelites said that the dome disrupted Przmysl's "Polish" skyline is a very serious attack. It needs to be sourced very well. I will try to get opinion of other wikipedia writers on this situation. Is there was board for this type of discussion on wikipedia? 23Michal ( talk) 12:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
One source is "sourced very well"? I see you have a sense for humor. Btw I have noticed most pages on wikipedia have a talk page for discussion but the Carmelite Church does not have it, why is that? 23Michal ( talk) 13:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
Not every piece of information requires more than one source for it, yes. But here is not normal piece of information. 23Michal ( talk) 18:36, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
In two days i tried hard to find sources for the claim "Carmelites of removing the dome from the church because it "disrupted Przmysl's Polish skyline" which is inserted into the article but i found nothing. 23Michal ( talk) 16:31, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Why do you continue just repeat that? Where are more sources? Or what was the source for Snyder. 23Michal ( talk) 23:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Why? Because I was unable to find any other source for that claim, that is why. 23Michal ( talk) 13:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I will check wikipedia rules. 23Michal ( talk) 14:23, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
I requested a quote from the book, the term "Polish skyline" seems dubious, although i don't reject possibility that it was used. -- MyMoloboaccount ( talk) 17:51, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Carmelite Church, Przemyśl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)