This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Photography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Brands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The A series and the G series do not have their own articles. Tell me, why should the S line? Furthermore, the articles contain very little encyclopedic content, it mostly being fact sheets of specs and information. Such information is already very well covered by the table. hbdragon88 ( talk) 20:38, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Actually, the A series and the G series do have their own articles. -- The High Fin Sperm Whale ( talk) 03:54, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply

By that I meant none of the individual camera models have their own articles. That was my rationale for redirecting S1-5, SX10, and SX20 articles into here. hbdragon88 ( talk) 04:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC) reply

Someone following this page might want to add the SX 720 HS. http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/canon_powershot_sx720_hs_review/specifications/ 122.60.111.50 ( talk) 23:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC) reply