![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link "southern civilization" is linked to the United States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_culture. This must be incorrect? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.126.16.203 ( talk) 01:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
The links at "What links here" give an idea of the range this entry should cover. Anyone ready to make a start? -- Wetman 07:44, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
What, no mention of the rampant organized crime and camorra that overruns this region? It might not be pretty, but it's a part of everyday life for many locals and for their sake it deserves a mention, instead of being brushed under the rug. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homerkp ( talk • contribs) 23:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
As being neapolitan i found this article close to atrocious. What relevance has in a geographic article the football teams of the region? What are m'gliatiegghij' and sammuchij'? The guy who wrote it has a very relative knowledge of neapolitan terms.-- Raffaele Megabyte 19:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
This article needs a major overhaul! It rambles, is sometimes poorly translated, and many statements are unsourced, PoV or simply not important. I've started to clean up- so far only the intro and demographics. Any assistance would be appreciated. Mariokempes 00:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
O.K. maybe we'd all sooner pretend they don't exist, but I'm afraid we can't deny that they've had and continue to have a massive impact on their region of origin - Campania. It's strange that they don't even get a single mention. This article isn't supposed to be a rose-tinted public relations exercise... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.196.132 ( talk) 18:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
I wonder whether friarielli is the same as broccoli di rape. Some websites indicate that the term "friarielli" is just a regional term for broccoli di rape. On google images, though, it looks a little different. Any one know? 72.78.11.48 ( talk) 13:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm planning to fully overhaul the history section and fully develop it, the current history section devotes 80% to a particularly non notable part of its history and its more of a hindrence than a help in me trying to write this. So I'm moving it here. - Gennarous ( talk) 17:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The demographics of section is completely Point of View especially in terms of relations with Greeks. I was the one that earlier added that Greek admixture averaged 15 percent in Campania which is verified by the study that goes with it.
This statement is false "the ethnicities outside of Italy itself some of the people associate with the Greeks, especially due to the Magna Græcia and Greco-Roman cultures; this is exemplified in the saying "una faccia, una razza" which means "one face, one race." Um how do you know this. The article that this was taken from (see here) [ [1]] was someones point of view and does not reflect scientific study, not to mention it is very inaccurate. Here is a quote: "Southerly Italia was settled by Greek 2500 months ago." This is horrible grammar and does not represent a credible source for the above statments.
According to a study on northern Campanian populations done by Professor M Kayser shows (see here: [ [2]] that they showed a strong relatedness to the Spanish, Portuguese, and Romanians, and near to the French. Greeks were close not as pronounced as this article states it. Campania and Sicily's demographics section should be rewritten. ( talk) 22:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Galati
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Campania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Campania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Campania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I've partially protected this page for a few days to give some respite from the flood of IP edits, and perhaps allow some discussion. I've looked at a small randomly-chosen number of those edits since 9 May, and don't see one single source added. I'm inclined to suggest rolling back to this revision, but I haven't looked at this carefully. Alessandro57, Denisarona, SunDawn, Ritchie92, Funandtrvl, Narky Blert, does that seem to be a good plan or am I way off-target? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
It was my IP address for contribution in Lombardy, Campania, Lazio, Piemont and so on. I tried to add references, but in that moment when I was adding ref to buffalo statistics, my changes disappeared and I can't add nothing anymore. I make article only since 2 months, therefore may be it was wrong way to add at first info and after that references. It is only my hobby and sometime I need to switch immediately to other task. I also tried to remove pictures and improve English. I think that pictures make good imagination, "taste" of land. Probably it was too much. I already register as Alrabt user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.157.7.80 ( talk)
@ 95.157.7.80 and Alrabt: please note that you are editing (also on Lombardy) without being logged in with your new account. Also, please, I am noticing these additions of sources [3] [4] [5] and many others, which really cannot be considered reliable sources. They will be eliminated soon, so please look for good, reliable sources (not blog posts, or weird websites online) to use as reference for the text that is written in that section. -- Ritchie92 ( talk) 10:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand why these 2 links not realiable:
It seems to me you are not objective to North Italian economical success. Alrabt ( talk) 14:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
All factories of mass-market automotive manufacturers [...] Innocenti are closed, abandoned or demolished. We need some reliable source explicitly stating that the Innocenti factories have been closed (you can read more in the WP article about reliable sources). An implication such as "there is a picture of an abandoned Innocenti, and therefore Innocenti is closed" constitutes original research, and is not allowed on Wikipedia.
At first I put link directly to WIKI article about Innoceti and Autobianchi where described when companies are closed. According to you it was not enough, so WIKI articles also not reliable? After that I add for every additional references, it also not ok, with photos of destroyed production halls. That also not ok. What is ok empty article as it was? Look article is very short, for example completely missing parts about Education, Research. May be it will be nice to improve article, instead to discuss quality of refs? Alfa Romeo, Innoceti and Autobiachi stopped production, that is fact, is not it? If detailed wiki article AND additional refs are not enough for you. May be you found link for that to show me what is reliable source? Alrabt ( talk) 16:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 12 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Patroklean (
article contribs).
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The link "southern civilization" is linked to the United States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_culture. This must be incorrect? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.126.16.203 ( talk) 01:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
The links at "What links here" give an idea of the range this entry should cover. Anyone ready to make a start? -- Wetman 07:44, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
What, no mention of the rampant organized crime and camorra that overruns this region? It might not be pretty, but it's a part of everyday life for many locals and for their sake it deserves a mention, instead of being brushed under the rug. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homerkp ( talk • contribs) 23:08, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
As being neapolitan i found this article close to atrocious. What relevance has in a geographic article the football teams of the region? What are m'gliatiegghij' and sammuchij'? The guy who wrote it has a very relative knowledge of neapolitan terms.-- Raffaele Megabyte 19:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
This article needs a major overhaul! It rambles, is sometimes poorly translated, and many statements are unsourced, PoV or simply not important. I've started to clean up- so far only the intro and demographics. Any assistance would be appreciated. Mariokempes 00:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
O.K. maybe we'd all sooner pretend they don't exist, but I'm afraid we can't deny that they've had and continue to have a massive impact on their region of origin - Campania. It's strange that they don't even get a single mention. This article isn't supposed to be a rose-tinted public relations exercise... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.196.132 ( talk) 18:24, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
I wonder whether friarielli is the same as broccoli di rape. Some websites indicate that the term "friarielli" is just a regional term for broccoli di rape. On google images, though, it looks a little different. Any one know? 72.78.11.48 ( talk) 13:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I'm planning to fully overhaul the history section and fully develop it, the current history section devotes 80% to a particularly non notable part of its history and its more of a hindrence than a help in me trying to write this. So I'm moving it here. - Gennarous ( talk) 17:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The demographics of section is completely Point of View especially in terms of relations with Greeks. I was the one that earlier added that Greek admixture averaged 15 percent in Campania which is verified by the study that goes with it.
This statement is false "the ethnicities outside of Italy itself some of the people associate with the Greeks, especially due to the Magna Græcia and Greco-Roman cultures; this is exemplified in the saying "una faccia, una razza" which means "one face, one race." Um how do you know this. The article that this was taken from (see here) [ [1]] was someones point of view and does not reflect scientific study, not to mention it is very inaccurate. Here is a quote: "Southerly Italia was settled by Greek 2500 months ago." This is horrible grammar and does not represent a credible source for the above statments.
According to a study on northern Campanian populations done by Professor M Kayser shows (see here: [ [2]] that they showed a strong relatedness to the Spanish, Portuguese, and Romanians, and near to the French. Greeks were close not as pronounced as this article states it. Campania and Sicily's demographics section should be rewritten. ( talk) 22:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Galati
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Campania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:59, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Campania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:45, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Campania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:12, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
I've partially protected this page for a few days to give some respite from the flood of IP edits, and perhaps allow some discussion. I've looked at a small randomly-chosen number of those edits since 9 May, and don't see one single source added. I'm inclined to suggest rolling back to this revision, but I haven't looked at this carefully. Alessandro57, Denisarona, SunDawn, Ritchie92, Funandtrvl, Narky Blert, does that seem to be a good plan or am I way off-target? Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 22:44, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
It was my IP address for contribution in Lombardy, Campania, Lazio, Piemont and so on. I tried to add references, but in that moment when I was adding ref to buffalo statistics, my changes disappeared and I can't add nothing anymore. I make article only since 2 months, therefore may be it was wrong way to add at first info and after that references. It is only my hobby and sometime I need to switch immediately to other task. I also tried to remove pictures and improve English. I think that pictures make good imagination, "taste" of land. Probably it was too much. I already register as Alrabt user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.157.7.80 ( talk)
@ 95.157.7.80 and Alrabt: please note that you are editing (also on Lombardy) without being logged in with your new account. Also, please, I am noticing these additions of sources [3] [4] [5] and many others, which really cannot be considered reliable sources. They will be eliminated soon, so please look for good, reliable sources (not blog posts, or weird websites online) to use as reference for the text that is written in that section. -- Ritchie92 ( talk) 10:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't understand why these 2 links not realiable:
It seems to me you are not objective to North Italian economical success. Alrabt ( talk) 14:39, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
All factories of mass-market automotive manufacturers [...] Innocenti are closed, abandoned or demolished. We need some reliable source explicitly stating that the Innocenti factories have been closed (you can read more in the WP article about reliable sources). An implication such as "there is a picture of an abandoned Innocenti, and therefore Innocenti is closed" constitutes original research, and is not allowed on Wikipedia.
At first I put link directly to WIKI article about Innoceti and Autobianchi where described when companies are closed. According to you it was not enough, so WIKI articles also not reliable? After that I add for every additional references, it also not ok, with photos of destroyed production halls. That also not ok. What is ok empty article as it was? Look article is very short, for example completely missing parts about Education, Research. May be it will be nice to improve article, instead to discuss quality of refs? Alfa Romeo, Innoceti and Autobiachi stopped production, that is fact, is not it? If detailed wiki article AND additional refs are not enough for you. May be you found link for that to show me what is reliable source? Alrabt ( talk) 16:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 12 May 2022. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Patroklean (
article contribs).