This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have slightly condensed the plot summary, as the flag criticising excessive plot detail seemed justified (30-04-17), and at present what should be a synopsis is instead a blow by blow account of the entire script. Before wading in with the shears, I will consult WikiHelp regarding how far an editor should go in such trimming. -- Humboles ( talk) 07:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
-- Humboles ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
As a fairly novice editor who doesn't know the ropes, I'd like to query user 212.135.65.247 's undoing on 19th May of my paragraph on the painting (added as 89.234.90.66 on 11th May as I forgot to log in). It was flagged as trivia but I felt that it was the sort of interesting point that I like to find in an encyclopaedia and also added a couple of relevant links. It may be the paragraph was too prominent but simply removing it without discussion is rather discouraging. What is the process now?
DecBrennan ( talk) 18:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
The plot timeline is not in order. The daughter came from london before the meeting with Fitzgerald for starters. The conversation with the doctor about the little girl came later in the plot than listed in the plot summary. -- DesmondE ( talk) 14:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
-- Humboles ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Is it common to detail the ending of a Movie on Wikipedia. This could ruin the movies for potential viewers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.206.198 ( talk) 00:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
-- Humboles ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
A character named Nzd has actively been chasing my contributions down on various pages unfarily and without reason. It has helped with the citation of works.-zaneta — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZanetaStepanova ( talk • contribs) 00:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
My sole aim is not to do that. Secondly, I didn't put in the Taste of Cinema review. Someone else did, and it has been their for months. Taste of Cinema is a notable film site, this is a notable review and I ask that you stop reverting it. Thank you.- zaneta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.136.255 ( talk) 13:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
There is nothing, absolutely nothing funny there. It is a particularly dark and pessimistic drama set in a gloomy location. No tongue in a cheek, nothing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:F2CB:C700:B452:FAA:D0C4:71A1 ( talk) 09:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have slightly condensed the plot summary, as the flag criticising excessive plot detail seemed justified (30-04-17), and at present what should be a synopsis is instead a blow by blow account of the entire script. Before wading in with the shears, I will consult WikiHelp regarding how far an editor should go in such trimming. -- Humboles ( talk) 07:52, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
-- Humboles ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
As a fairly novice editor who doesn't know the ropes, I'd like to query user 212.135.65.247 's undoing on 19th May of my paragraph on the painting (added as 89.234.90.66 on 11th May as I forgot to log in). It was flagged as trivia but I felt that it was the sort of interesting point that I like to find in an encyclopaedia and also added a couple of relevant links. It may be the paragraph was too prominent but simply removing it without discussion is rather discouraging. What is the process now?
DecBrennan ( talk) 18:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
The plot timeline is not in order. The daughter came from london before the meeting with Fitzgerald for starters. The conversation with the doctor about the little girl came later in the plot than listed in the plot summary. -- DesmondE ( talk) 14:02, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
-- Humboles ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Is it common to detail the ending of a Movie on Wikipedia. This could ruin the movies for potential viewers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.148.206.198 ( talk) 00:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
-- Humboles ( talk) 19:25, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
A character named Nzd has actively been chasing my contributions down on various pages unfarily and without reason. It has helped with the citation of works.-zaneta — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZanetaStepanova ( talk • contribs) 00:27, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
My sole aim is not to do that. Secondly, I didn't put in the Taste of Cinema review. Someone else did, and it has been their for months. Taste of Cinema is a notable film site, this is a notable review and I ask that you stop reverting it. Thank you.- zaneta. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.217.136.255 ( talk) 13:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
There is nothing, absolutely nothing funny there. It is a particularly dark and pessimistic drama set in a gloomy location. No tongue in a cheek, nothing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:F2CB:C700:B452:FAA:D0C4:71A1 ( talk) 09:57, 31 October 2019 (UTC)