![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
just think there should be more info on mutylplayer becuase it is such a big part of the game. For example someone could add an some information about gold weapons etc. Hungaryboy1 ( talk) 13:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thats what 'call of duty wikia' is for. it has lots of tips and info on the game and weapons. ( 210.50.143.22 ( talk) 10:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)) a nut
there is a typo on the main page under mutply player there is no sudden death match its just a draw (I'v played for over 10 days total & hsve it since dec. 2008 I should know IM NOT RONG!!!) By PSN: zdog90210 feal free to send me a frend request.
ive also played for roughly 10 days total and i can also vouch there is no sudden death and who ever it was who commented before me, who are you to say nobody cares just because you dont.
I dont care either... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.61.33.34 ( talk) 22:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Does consensus established on this page carry over to other pages about CoD 4? SirBob42 ( talk) 18:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The game modes are very good. You can kill to get xp, its 55 levels. When you reach 55 and beat it you start (reaborn)1,2,3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.160.246.129 ( talk) 09:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Recurring NPCs, such as Gaz, Vasquez, Griggs, and Kamarov should be mentioned, as they are more prominent than Victor (who only appears in two missions). Have a seperate paragraph for the villians. GoldDragon ( talk) 04:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't someone put Cpt. Price in there? 82.141.112.4 ( talk) 16:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Wait, ignore me. I mixed the articles. Sorry. 82.141.112.4 ( talk) 16:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I have moved consensus to the FAQ template now, to organize things a little. It will be easier for newbies to the article to spot, and the first thread on this page can now be archived as other threads on this page. I have also added auto-archiving to this talk page because it is getting long and unwieldy. Gary King ( talk) 04:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The FAQ basicaly says the samething as the Summary consensus. In retrospect I thought I should bring it up before i deleted the consensus to see what the majority opinion was
Nitsuahh87 (
talk)
14:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I have, for the first time, actually read through this article, and have already encountered several copyediting problems. I have fixed several, and will continue to do so for the entire article. If anyone has the time, please help out and copyedit the article so that it meets high standards. Feel free to brush up on your copyediting abilities by reading User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. Cheers! Gary King ( talk) 05:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
no you do not need internet connection to play. but you need it to play online and download new maps. cyberwolf ( talk) 14:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
There is also an imprecision in those requirements: the graphic hardware needs to have support for Pixel Shader 3 to install the game due to a hardware check. There doesn't seem to be any software to emulate this (specifically) as it can be done for more mature (older) graphical technologies and other games. see SwiftShader and 3D Analyze. Tourist.tam ( talk) 07:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Some person in a fourm said it is banned in Syria do to the closeness of the names Al-Asad and Al-Ass. The correct form is Al Asad in the game. I said he was wrong and he went crazy saying some dumb stuff that I was stupid. Who is right, cause I could find No Source that confirmed his statement that this game is banned in Syria. Asad and Assad are very common middle eastern names anyway 72.138.216.89 ( talk) 20:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Addressing a concern in the FAC, I went ahead and added a bit about the epilogue awesome mission to the campaign section; it could probably be tweaked somewhat or elaborated on, but that's the best I can do since it has been some time since I last played the game. On a side note, it's a shame one of the first comments on the FAC page is an outright oppose, but I suppose that's just my pessimism speaking. -- Comandante {Talk} 20:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
"A single-player demo for the PC4PC was released on October 11, 2007 as a Yahoo! exclusive download. It was released on various major sites the same day" - this seems like a contradiction. Could it be clarified? Epbr123 ( talk) 09:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Is prestige only limited to certain versions of the game? I have the PC version and was told by someone online that it's not offered on PC, yet my husband has it on his Xbox 360. He (my husband) checked the icons of those playing in a few games with me on the PC, and he says no one seems to have the prestige features; so shouldn't this be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asinine17 ( talk • contribs) 16:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Apologies if i don't properly adhere to the guidelines of how to write on these pages; I'm new to it. Anyway, I just noticed a small discrepancy in the 'Multiplayer' section. The last sentence states that "Completing a challenge can unlock new weapons, perks, or other bonuses, or it can grant experience points". In fact, completing challanges only results in extra experience points, which in turn can help the player level up, and so indirectly the player may gain access to weapons, perks, etc. The completion of any challange does not necessarily grant access to anything but experience points. -Dan, 19:16 April 29, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.202.135.218 ( talk) 18:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Well you are right and wrong you do get exp for completing a challeng but if you complete all the challenges example all assualt rifle
challenges=golden AK-47. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SAS sniper6610 (
talk •
contribs)
22:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
The last sentance of the multiplayer section "Completing a challenge grants experience points, which can be used to unlock new weapons, perks, or other bonuses" is redundant of the paragraph it was orignally in. Can someone change this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.77.176.58 ( talk) 22:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure that this improves the article. Origonally the preceding sentence (now the last sentence in the paragraph) told the reader what challanges are, and the last sentence explained why challanges are useful, or why the player may be motivated to complete them. Now however, the first sentence in the paragraph tells the reader why challanges are useful, and only informed what these challanges are at the end. To me, this way makes less sense.
On the content of this sentence, I think it is a little inaccurate. To me the phrasing suggests that the player can trade experience points for the weapons perks. However, completing challanges results experience points which may help the player advance in level; unlocking weapons, perks and other challanges. This is just a small issue with phrasing, and it may be my own incorrect interpretation. Just drawing attention to it. 213.202.164.186 ( talk) 18:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Dan, 30 April, 2008
One word: helooo?-- coolbho3000 ( talk) 19:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
with the prestige mode for cod 4.. after you prestige so many times do you begin to recive gamer pictures for your current prestige mode? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.109.145 ( talk) 02:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
in the multiplayer section it states that the result of a tie game is sudden death or completing the objective, however in the headquarters and deathmatch gametypes a tie game results in a draw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.109.145 ( talk) 02:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The UK collectors edition has the poster and DVD, however, it does not have the hardback art book. I don't know about other countries so it might be worth mentioning. Douglasnicol ( talk) 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
It is out now. [1] 80.202.209.248 ( talk) 18:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
the article states its being released in may 2008, now its june but there is still no word about it. Chegis ( talk) 16:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Just how exactly was it established that Griggs was shot in the private parts? I've played through that sequence multiple times, and it does not look like Griggs was shot in the neck, since the blood splatter covers his whole head. 96.241.113.150 ( talk) 23:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Griggs was definatly shot in the head. Just beacuse there wasn't any bloody chunks it doesn't mean that he was shot in the neck. I watched Griggs death numerous times and the blood spray came out of his head. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.146.129 ( talk) 22:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
A lot of people seem to think that the Price that appears in the 2nd game is the same guy who appears in this game. It's been decided that CoD4 is set in 2011, Call of Duty 2 was set during the second world war so for Price to be the same guy, he would be in his 70s which is an impossible age to be if you're captain of an SAS regiment. Shouldn't something be added to the article? —— Ryan | t • c 10:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
The main antagonist for Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare is Imran Zakhaev, not Khaled-Al-Asad. Khaled Al-Asad is just the secondary antagonist. Notice that when you and your team captures Al-Asad, Zakhaev calls him(Al-Asad)on his phone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireboy000 ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
On the back of the box it says "This Product contains software technology licensed from ID software", which seems to be the Quake 3 engine. The competitive community picked up on this and found that bugs relating to fps (certain fps numbers let you jump slightly farther) from the Quake 3 engine still apply in CoD4. Can somebody help me find a source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeith ( talk • contribs) 21:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
ID have more than one game.( 121.217.56.178 ( talk) 05:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC))
I just noticed that the sales section gives no details on PC sales, compared to its in depth view of sales on xbox 360 and ps3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghyslyn ( talk • contribs) 06:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Activision can't really confirm it's PC sales because of piracy and downloads. here's article: http://kotaku.com/344848/piracy-makes-call-of-duty-4-devs-sad
http://kotaku.com/364440/pc-gamings-piracy-sales-charts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakimstar ( talk • contribs) 09:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
This game is banned in the Middle East. I've been to All the Virgin shops here in and it's not allowed, which is Ironic seeing they allow Counter strike to go in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.150.72.34 ( talk) 13:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Xaerun: What is 'irrelevant'? Rather, it is odd that there is no 'controversy' section in this article mentioning/dealing with subconscious reinforcement of contemporary middle-eastern conflict. Al-Jazeera ran a documentary on this kind of genre of video games: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afKENY4xcM4 and how this is possibly used as a recruiting tool in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S4053674 ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
You can repeat prestige mode nine times, if you were to repeat it ten times, you would be able to go into your eleventh prestige. I have corrected this error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunkalax ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Dave ( talk) 16:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
You can level up a total of 540 times, because you start at level one each time you prestige and first start. Where 600 came from, I really don't know. Dunkalax ( talk) 01:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- You can actually level up 595 times because there are levels 1-55 BEFORE you prestige and then you can prestige a TOTAL of 10 times. It is a little confusing when they said you can REPEAT prestige nine times (assuming once plus nine repeats = ten total) which is technically correct. Probably should be reworded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.171.42 ( talk) 19:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have had almost daily contact with Aspyr Games, and the requirements have just been released. I am just a noob editor, though, and do not know enough HTML or what have you to edit the chart of system reqs. The link the the reqs is here:
http://www.aspyr.com/product/game_specs/88 J1.grammar natz ( talk) 21:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Thought I might bring this to your attention:
http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-wtf-world-of-wikipedia/a-2008062510326553058
-- Broadbandmink ( talk) 22:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Dear fellow contributors
MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes rules for the raw formatting, irrespective of whether a date is autoformatted or not). MOSLINK and CONTEXT are consistent with this.
There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here:
Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. Does anyone object if I remove it from the main text in a few days’ time on a trial basis? The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just the huge number of visitors; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which would give greater prominence to the high-value links. Tony (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
The image above seems to have texture resolution that wasn't set to the highest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icyplanetnhc ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Is there a movie scheduled for the game? It has a high quality scenario. I hope they consider the production of movie for it. -- Fotte ( talk) 13:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that the word "ultranaionalist" doesn't have consistent capitalization. 24.6.160.190 ( talk) 06:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hmm? ( Butters x ( talk) 20:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC))
Ehem, making a LIST of guns used in the game is NOT WP:NOT#GUIDE. ( Butters x ( talk) 15:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC))
As per all. It violates game guide. Why not add those in COD Wikia?. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 15:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
In the last level, it's unclear whether or not Soap survives the blast. However, when I played the epilogue, I assumed that the character I took control of was Soap McTavish, meaning that he DID survive the blast. Can anyone find a credible source to say that character was or was not Soap? Fresnel149 ( talk) 10:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Infinity Ward created Call of Duty 1, 2, and 4. Call of Duty 3 and the new Call of Duty are created by Treyarch. Infinity Ward had not planned to make another Call of Duty but decided to after the release of COD3 (Maybe because of the all-around concensus that it wasn't good?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdalyspx ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
The native resolution here is said to be 720p on consoles. It's not, it is 600p. The reference is already there to an article certifying that it is 600p, it just says 720p for some reason. —— Hamish Morrison ( talk) 15:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Should there not be some kind of criticism section? Just a suggestion, I mean it reads like an advertisment for the most part. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ( Ταλκ) 14:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Would it be appropriate for this article to have reference to case of missing Ontario teen, linked to the game http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_28861.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aou ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't know, but wouldn't it be good to update the sales in the overview section (from 7 millions in January this year to 10 million units sold by June this year.)? Assuming that there are enough sources, of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.233.27.196 ( talk) 16:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
If the missing teen segment is re-added to the article or added elsewhere, the part concerning the teen's father needs to be changed if it still says he thought his son was serious. The reference where it was taken from mentions that the father thought his son would be back in two days with his tail between his legs; so another words he thought his son was bluffing instead of being serious. -- J Grant Fox ( talk) 07:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
You know this really annoys me when they blame Real life issues and happenings on Video games, how in the hell does what happened to this boy tie in with Call Of Duty 4?, nothing that's what, he fell from a tree probably down to playing or wanting to climb, people in the media take video gaming too seriously and I think it's very unfair to blame Video Games for anything, if he was trying to copy what they saw in the game, then that's his own fault not the game, really gets on my last nerves, he should have more responsible hell being 15 where are his parents in all this?, I feel sorry for them I do but each human being is responsible for his or her actions not some form of imitation from playing games. 91.107.166.20 ( talk) 02:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
They did not dislike the game. They gave it a 90%. Here is the end:
"VERDICT + Utterly spectacular + Genius in parts - Seven hours long It's smoke and mirrors and a host of cheap tricks - but, as always, it's wonderful. 90%"
HELLO, anyone editing this article? The above is true. The article is factually incorrect in their assessment of the views of Xbox World 360.
I'm deleting the phrase "which has affected the game's sales" after the part about COD4 being a big target of piracy. Just because somebody pirates a game does not mean that if piracy wasn't an option they would automatically and by logical necessity go out and pay $60+ for it. It's an absurd myth that a pirated game equals a lost sale, or that "true *would-be* sales/revenue!" can be derived from piracy figures. It's much more accurate and informative to say that pirates are "not helping" the industry that they love so much, because they're not paying for their games. You could even go so far as to say they "harm" the industry, but only by hurting the morale of some developers, not the sales figures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.230.16 ( talk) 22:27, 7 December 2008(UTC)
I agree. It's a point of contestion, if piracy really does hurt sales much, and it's purely speculative in the article. It appears that the edit was undone, however, and I'd like to hear the other point of view before it is redone. But since it lacks a source, and since it is, more or less, speculative, I'd vouch for a deletion of that phrase as well. Synthmon ( talk) 12:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Not sure where or how to add this, but apparently a sequel is in the works, as shown here: [3]. Umbralcorax ( talk) 04:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Since it's locked, I'll post this here. Typo at "dynamics shadows" in the intro. 206.190.248.2 ( talk) 22:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The sales figures in this article need to be updated, Call Of Duty 4 has surpassed 14 million copies now and is the all time number one Xbox 360 game for sales as stated on their official website. 91.107.166.20 ( talk) 02:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
The summaries for both obscure the question as to which one was the best-selling game of 2007.-- 66.229.57.140 ( talk) 01:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Mallerd recently asked me why I removed two images from the Plot section ( this one and this one). I said that I think we should try and get the most relevant images for the section, not just weapons that are used for brief scenes in the game, which is why I added the image of the Marines—I tried to find one of a SAS unit as well, but it appears that the SAS article doesn't have one. I also kept the image of Prypiat, Ukraine ( this one) because it helps to add some atmosphere to the section, in my opinion; it's particularly unique in that it shows the desolation of the place, which is pretty significant in the scene when the player is there. Thoughts on all this? Gary King ( talk) 16:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I thought Gary should be more consequent, because the criteria he stated applied to all pictures (at least in my opinion and I can't imagine anyone thinking different). I said to him that I feel he likes to own this article with moves like that, bending himself in strange curves (is that English?). His suggestion was to move it onto this talkpage, here it is. Mallerd ( talk) 10:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Uh, why isn't his actor listed?? It says his actor at imdb..... 75.72.221.172 ( talk) 04:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Why does it say it's resolution is at 600p? It seems it is supported at [[ http://www.covergalaxy.com/forum/attachments/sony-ps3/5802d1227050354-call-duty-4-modern-warfare-r1-ps3-cover-dvd-cod-4-cover-3118x1748.jpg%7Cfull 1080p]], so why doesn't say so
The narrative resolution of Call of Duty 4 on consoles is 600p. You can still play it on 720 and 1080 but it is being upconverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.190.240.1 ( talk) 01:58, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
I vote we take this out, nothing runs at that FPS, it's better to say it's a 60hz game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.182.57 ( talk) 01:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Price was in the final final level, "Mile High Club" as one of your squad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.62.231 ( talk) 21:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
If you have the slo-mo cheat unlocked, use it during the cinimatic when Kamarov arrives at the bridge to rescue you. Look at the medic with Price. With slo-mo, you can see carefully that the medic pounds Price in frustration after giving up trying to revive him, and starts to get up, and then you're are lifted into the medevac. Try it. Look carefully and you should see it. 69.114.152.45 ( talk) 01:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)'anonymous'
Even if Price died, does it really matter? it wouldn't be the first time, (Call of Duty) or that he didn't seem to age between the early 1940's and the present —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.171.193 ( talk) 00:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
You're a dickhead then aren't you? It blatantly says Captain Price over his head —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.74.122 ( talk) 20:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Price survives, he is a NPC in Modern Warfare 2._Dominic_
I think the part with the plot summary should be edited at the very end. It says Price survives and plays a prominent role in MW2 but this doesn't happen until 3/4 into the game and it's a big plot twist. I would consider this last sentence a big spoiler. If I hadn't already beaten MW2 i would be upset to read this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.134.42.42 ( talk) 23:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
ok. not sure why you're so upset, we're on the talk page... it's not like i'm vandalizing the main article. I didn't see anything else in this section of the talk page regarding this as a spoiler. I apologize (not sarcastic).
Having played the game, I can tell you that it is not Price who is being revived by the medic, it is Gaz. Captain Price has a very distinctive mustache, whereas Gaz has his trademark cap. The soldier the medic is trying to revive is clearly Gaz, while it is Price who slides the pistol to Soap.-- Sem;colon ( talk) 04:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, what kind of accent do captain Price and Gaz have? Mallerd ( talk) 17:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
i believe it's called a fake 'english' accent —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.105.228 ( talk) 18:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah well, in England you have a lot of accents. Wondered what it was: from Derbyshire, Hertfordshire. I don't know, know it sure isn't fake though. Mallerd ( talk) 00:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Price was voiced by Billy Murray and Gaz was voiced by Craig Fairbrass, both Londoners. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.149.21 ( talk) 23:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Price and Gaz are both from the Londoner East End. The accent is called Cockney. Cheerio Lads —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.20.54 ( talk) 19:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Defo doing cockney Londoner accents (as most Americans believe London accounts for the entire of the UK). I'm surprised Infinity Ward didn't incorporate rhyming slang. -- 92.25.194.45 ( talk) 02:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I am pretty sure the accents are British — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.12.182.178 (
talk)
04:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to change "while Price fired a sniper rifle" in the Plot section to "while Price fired a .50 BMG sniper rifle" (with the hypertext), just to put it into some context as to why the entire arm of Zakhaev could be blown off by a rifle shot. Any objection? Ken l lee ( talk) 04:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
No 174.112.230.127 ( talk) 01:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
It seems quite possible that the country in which Al-Fulani is is executed could be at least partially modeled on some sort of of post-monarchy Saudi Arabia. Not only does the location of President All-Fulani's execution resemble Deera Square, but at the point when Al-Assad refers to "our [country's] monarchy before the Revolution," it could be that the revolution he is referring to is his own -- that is, he may be alluding to having wiped out the royal family of his country as well. Furthermore, when there is the satellite imagery and voiceover of the SAS personnel just hearing of the execution of Al-Fulani, the imagery is much more consistent will a location in Saudi Arabia than with any another nearby possibility, such as the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. However, even though Saudi Arabia is certainly "oil-rich," it is not "small," so as might be expected, it seems extremely unlikely that the supposed county is intended to represent any place in the real word. One of the only determinations that can be made with certainty is that the country is question cannot be the Islamic Republic of Iran, because all the characters in the sequence are speaking Arabic -- none are speaking Farsi. SithiR ( talk) 19:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
In the plot section of this artical it says that the american command is warned of Al-Asad having a nucleur warhead by the seals however this is incorrect as it is clearly stated in the game that the intel came from the SAS, most likly from Nikoli the informant rescued by Captain Price's squad although this is not confirmed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.189.98 ( talk) 14:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Can somebody with the authority to do so please remove this:
"The online play for PS3 has lately had a lot of players using Hacks ansd the website is in a tutorial on you tube but for any one who thinks this has ruined the game (like me) then according to you tube an asshole called Dark Mamatta found the hacks so blame that douch bag."
It is under the 'Multiplayer' part of the 'Gameplay' section.
Thank you.
I know that the engine's name IW 4.0 engine was confirmed for Modern Warfare 2 on IGN, but does it make CoD4's engine: IW 3.0 engine? I mean there is no absolute confirmation to affirm that...-- PhantomT1412 ( talk) 11:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Here in the article, it says that they disliked the game. Untrue; they gave it a 90%. Last time I brought this up, I was told to source it and edit. The source is the magazine itself, and it is sourced. This is what I gave last time as their verdict: "VERDICT + Utterly spectacular + Genius in parts - Seven hours long It's smoke and mirrors and a host of cheap tricks - but, as always, it's wonderful. 90%" I can't edit due to protection, but until the issue with the blatant lie saying that XW360 disliked the game is removed, I can't really take this article very seriously. ShaneHaughey ( talk) 00:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
206.217.9.240 ( talk) 03:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I believe, that it should be stated that, the game takes place, in the years 1996 and 2011. I can backup this claim, as, before "All Ghillied Up", It was 15 years ago, and Captain Price states that it's been a decade since the Chernobyl explosion. That would claim, that they year in "All Ghillied Up" is 1996, and 15 years after that, is 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.169.215.79 ( talk) 01:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
"Call of Duty 4 is a target of piracy, which has resulted in multiple copies of the game being illegally distributed online." This sentence is INCREDIBLY bad. EVERY video game is a "target of piracy". Hell, piracy HAS no "target". Here's a paraphrase to showcase how atrociously written it is: "Cake is a target of fat people, which has resulted in multiple recipes of the food being distributed online."
At the intro to the section the article begins listing the type of game modes in multiplayer however leaving out objective based game modes it only list team based and deathmatch I feel that needs to be added in. Also the article says that the different game modes all require unique strategies however that is not true. One team could use a simple strategy of just killing the enemy team and complete every match they play with a win or tie. This is true due to the fact that most game modes killing all enemy players in sudden death or the last round/2 minuet timer results in a win. That brings me to the final point of not game modes give a sudden death timer like the article states. Matches like team deatchmatch will soley result in the two teams tieing and the gaming ending. 70.94.249.191 ( talk) 00:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it noteworthy that there is a teddy bear located somewhere on every multiplayer map? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynameisjimi ( talk • contribs) 23:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
There is not a teddy bear on every single map. Ambush, Bloc, Crossfire, 2 at Overgrown, Chinatown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.190.240.1 ( talk) 01:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
A user continues to add what he thinks the year is, 2011. The references used are a wikia article, a posting on gamefaqs and imdb. These do not meet WP:RS and I have reverted the change Dbrodbeck ( talk) 12:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
I can't really source this (or edit the article for that matter), but Modern Warfare 2 reveals what happened to Captain Price. Somehow he ended up in a Russian gulag. In the mission "The Gulag", your goal is rescure prisoner #627, who turns out to be Price. Price joins your team, and Soap gives him back the pistol that he used to kill Zakhaev at the end of COD4. I won't spoil how Modern Warfare 2 ends, but Price will play a big part. When the game comes out, someone should update Price's fate at the end of the article's story to say that "he survived, but was imprisoned in a Russian gulag up until the events of Modern Warfare 2". 164.107.91.60 ( talk) 14:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not apirate, it's all on COD wiki. If naything, there the pirates over their. That's why I cant source it, because the stuff on the wiki isn't sourced. I think it's true, though. 164.107.91.223 ( talk) 18:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes exactly, Price's fate is not relevant to the first game's plot. So all information or speculation about the game's plot beyond what is shown in the first game should be moved to the Modern Warfare 2 page. This should include the fact that Price is alive, which no doubt belongs on the modern warfare 2 page because it is not clear from the first game's plot. You stated before that this is an encyclopedia. I agree, so let's keep the information organized and where it is supposed to be. If I want to read information about a game's plot I would like to read that plot, not another plot. Cpt.MacTavish ( talk) 03:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
It does mention that Price's fate is left unknown. Clarification that he survived to be in the sequel would be a no-brainer since MacTavish's fate is also clarified. We could just say that Price survived. It's short and doesn't stray into the sequel's plot. I'm getting the game tonight, I may post later to confirm that Price does reappear. =/= Ironoclast (Talk) 22:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I removed a small bit at the end of the synopsis where it revealed that Price was revealed to play a major role in the second Modern Warfare game. I felt this was necessary seeing as though many of us thought that Price had indeed died after the first game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dysenterymatt ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
← In my experience, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS also applies to details in articles, so the Saint's Row argument is invalid. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 12:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
In the article, it mentions that a Russian medic attempts to resuscitate Price. This is incorrect. He was trying to resusitate Gaz, as Price was concious —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.226.41 ( talk) 07:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
In section 2.2, paragraph 1: manifest should link to the following page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest#Industry Derekawesome ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
"It was the top-selling game worldwide for 2007, reaching over seven million copies by January 2008, and over 13 million by May 2009.[3]"
According to the 2007 in video gaming it was outsold by both Halo 3 and Wii Play.
WesUGAdawg ( talk) 21:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Somebody needs to sign their post!!!! Uncle Soprano ( talk) 23:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Anyone think the upgraded AI system should be mentioned? Uncle Soprano ( talk) 02:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Why is this game described as a "first person shooter/romance" game in the beginning of the article? What does romance have to do with it? --JZAONE (sorry don't know how to sign my discussion yet)
Under "Development" the article says, "Call of Duty 4 was developed by a team of a hundred people, over the course of two hundred years." I don't know much about the game, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't in development since the Napoleonic Wars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.232.73 ( talk) 17:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Why is ewerhwhere here written about some Ultranationalists?
Russian Ultranationalists don't wish to restore USSR, and many of them hate this period of our history. Some of them even want to cut off Northern Caucasus as non-Russian home of hated islamic Caucasians. And Chechen Imran Zakhaev (his name is Chechen) cannot be leader of Russian nationalists - this is a nonsense like a Black leader of Aryan Nation.
In-Game Russian insurgents can be Communists of some sort, or Eurasianists (like Alexander Dugin) - but not Ultranationalists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.81.185.23 ( talk) 15:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
In the 'Retail versions' section, it states that "The PlayStation 3 version included the Variety map pack on the disc, and while the Xbox 360 Game of the Year edition initially included an insert in the packaging which could be redeemed on Xbox Live Marketplace to download the Variety map pack, later releases did not contain the inserts, and so were no different from the original release of the game."
However this isn't correct, the PS3 version does not include the variety map pack on the disc. Like the Xbox 360 version, initially an insert was included with a unique keycode to obtain the first Call Of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Map Pack for free. Later releases did not.
The release which includes the insert has a circle on the bottom right hand corner of the cover with the words "FREE *4 New multiplayer maps" ( http://au.gamespot.com/ps3/action/callofduty4modernwarfare/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0).
203.32.16.176 ( talk) 04:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Milto 28/01/2011
gaz was a great guy and was shot to death for no reason. i like the g36c's though —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.76.41.58 ( talk) 04:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
The article should mention somewhere the character Captain Price in Call of Duty the original. He's a main character who appears in the American and British campaign as a British soldier, he's even got the signature Price mustache. I assume he's implied to be the Modern Warfare Price's father. Someone with more experience contributing to Wikipedia pages than I could add this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.176.16 ( talk) 04:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I think the plot section is too long and should be trimmed down a bit to make it concise- SCB '92 ( talk) 16:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I know the years Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2 take place in have long been the source of speculation, well now they've finally been confirmed in Modern Warfare 3. The mission "Blood Brothers" shows flashbacks of events that occurred in COD4 and MW2 with actual dates attached to them. The flashback of the Zakhaev assassination attempt in Prypiat (COD4 mission "One shot. One kill") is labelled as "winter 1996". The flashback of the nuclear detonation in the middle east (COD4 mission "Shock and awe") is labelled as "2011". Finally, the flashback of the Zakhaev airport massacre scene (MW2 mission "No Russian") is labelled "2016". These had long been the speculated dates, but now that they're actually confirmed, I was thinking they could be added into the COD4 and MW2 articles. Splew ( talk) 20:15, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I can't help but wonder if "Gaz" is based off a man of the same name in Andy Mcnab's Immediate action, and can't help but wonder as well whether it would be useful to try to find some information about how they designed the characters. 109.156.192.4 ( talk) 14:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
We need to protect mw2's page too, why is this protected when its 5 years old, when mw2 is up and free? Just wondering. =) 140.198.46.138 ( talk) 00:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Reading through this article I've noticed that when referring back to the title of the game, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare are used all over the place. Can we reach consensus on how the article refers back to and edit the article to reflect this? CR4ZE ( talk) 08:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Modern Warfare is a game [...] Modern Warfare features [...] Modern Warfare received [...] Modern Warfare was subjected to [...] Modern Warfare made it so [...] The Modern Warfare update [...]
and use that as indicator that there is no repetition. I don't think anyone said we can't use other pronouns or descriptors. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 20:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Modern Warfare is a game [...] Among the core features are [...] The game received [...] Gameplay became a subject to [...] The developers made it so [...] The first update [...]
Hi.
I just made a mass revert to four edits added hours ago. Here is an extended explanation of why. Basically, the edits:
For example, in the first sentence:
In 2011, a civil war has broken out in Russia between its current government and Ultranationalists
"Current" is superfluous. Certainly, "its government" never means "its past government" because if it is past, it is no longer government. Same goes for additions like:
Then we get to more grave issues.
As U.S. Marines invade the palace, the Marines engage Al-Asad's ground forces.
Seriously, how can Marines both invade the place and meanwhile engage ground forces elsewhere? They can't; the original text was correct. SEALs and their EOD team invade the palace. Marines stay in the city.
Finally, in violation of WP:IINFO, a lot of character names were added and attempt was made to dramatize the ending. As IINFO explains, these additions only make sense to those who already know about them and only serve to detract from the focus of article on Zakhaev.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk)
06:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 15 external links on
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
just think there should be more info on mutylplayer becuase it is such a big part of the game. For example someone could add an some information about gold weapons etc. Hungaryboy1 ( talk) 13:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thats what 'call of duty wikia' is for. it has lots of tips and info on the game and weapons. ( 210.50.143.22 ( talk) 10:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)) a nut
there is a typo on the main page under mutply player there is no sudden death match its just a draw (I'v played for over 10 days total & hsve it since dec. 2008 I should know IM NOT RONG!!!) By PSN: zdog90210 feal free to send me a frend request.
ive also played for roughly 10 days total and i can also vouch there is no sudden death and who ever it was who commented before me, who are you to say nobody cares just because you dont.
I dont care either... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.61.33.34 ( talk) 22:12, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Does consensus established on this page carry over to other pages about CoD 4? SirBob42 ( talk) 18:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The game modes are very good. You can kill to get xp, its 55 levels. When you reach 55 and beat it you start (reaborn)1,2,3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.160.246.129 ( talk) 09:24, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Recurring NPCs, such as Gaz, Vasquez, Griggs, and Kamarov should be mentioned, as they are more prominent than Victor (who only appears in two missions). Have a seperate paragraph for the villians. GoldDragon ( talk) 04:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't someone put Cpt. Price in there? 82.141.112.4 ( talk) 16:26, 13 June 2008 (UTC) Wait, ignore me. I mixed the articles. Sorry. 82.141.112.4 ( talk) 16:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
I have moved consensus to the FAQ template now, to organize things a little. It will be easier for newbies to the article to spot, and the first thread on this page can now be archived as other threads on this page. I have also added auto-archiving to this talk page because it is getting long and unwieldy. Gary King ( talk) 04:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
The FAQ basicaly says the samething as the Summary consensus. In retrospect I thought I should bring it up before i deleted the consensus to see what the majority opinion was
Nitsuahh87 (
talk)
14:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
I have, for the first time, actually read through this article, and have already encountered several copyediting problems. I have fixed several, and will continue to do so for the entire article. If anyone has the time, please help out and copyedit the article so that it meets high standards. Feel free to brush up on your copyediting abilities by reading User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. Cheers! Gary King ( talk) 05:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
no you do not need internet connection to play. but you need it to play online and download new maps. cyberwolf ( talk) 14:39, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
There is also an imprecision in those requirements: the graphic hardware needs to have support for Pixel Shader 3 to install the game due to a hardware check. There doesn't seem to be any software to emulate this (specifically) as it can be done for more mature (older) graphical technologies and other games. see SwiftShader and 3D Analyze. Tourist.tam ( talk) 07:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Some person in a fourm said it is banned in Syria do to the closeness of the names Al-Asad and Al-Ass. The correct form is Al Asad in the game. I said he was wrong and he went crazy saying some dumb stuff that I was stupid. Who is right, cause I could find No Source that confirmed his statement that this game is banned in Syria. Asad and Assad are very common middle eastern names anyway 72.138.216.89 ( talk) 20:08, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Addressing a concern in the FAC, I went ahead and added a bit about the epilogue awesome mission to the campaign section; it could probably be tweaked somewhat or elaborated on, but that's the best I can do since it has been some time since I last played the game. On a side note, it's a shame one of the first comments on the FAC page is an outright oppose, but I suppose that's just my pessimism speaking. -- Comandante {Talk} 20:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
"A single-player demo for the PC4PC was released on October 11, 2007 as a Yahoo! exclusive download. It was released on various major sites the same day" - this seems like a contradiction. Could it be clarified? Epbr123 ( talk) 09:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Is prestige only limited to certain versions of the game? I have the PC version and was told by someone online that it's not offered on PC, yet my husband has it on his Xbox 360. He (my husband) checked the icons of those playing in a few games with me on the PC, and he says no one seems to have the prestige features; so shouldn't this be mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asinine17 ( talk • contribs) 16:52, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Apologies if i don't properly adhere to the guidelines of how to write on these pages; I'm new to it. Anyway, I just noticed a small discrepancy in the 'Multiplayer' section. The last sentence states that "Completing a challenge can unlock new weapons, perks, or other bonuses, or it can grant experience points". In fact, completing challanges only results in extra experience points, which in turn can help the player level up, and so indirectly the player may gain access to weapons, perks, etc. The completion of any challange does not necessarily grant access to anything but experience points. -Dan, 19:16 April 29, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.202.135.218 ( talk) 18:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Well you are right and wrong you do get exp for completing a challeng but if you complete all the challenges example all assualt rifle
challenges=golden AK-47. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
SAS sniper6610 (
talk •
contribs)
22:52, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
The last sentance of the multiplayer section "Completing a challenge grants experience points, which can be used to unlock new weapons, perks, or other bonuses" is redundant of the paragraph it was orignally in. Can someone change this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.77.176.58 ( talk) 22:36, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure that this improves the article. Origonally the preceding sentence (now the last sentence in the paragraph) told the reader what challanges are, and the last sentence explained why challanges are useful, or why the player may be motivated to complete them. Now however, the first sentence in the paragraph tells the reader why challanges are useful, and only informed what these challanges are at the end. To me, this way makes less sense.
On the content of this sentence, I think it is a little inaccurate. To me the phrasing suggests that the player can trade experience points for the weapons perks. However, completing challanges results experience points which may help the player advance in level; unlocking weapons, perks and other challanges. This is just a small issue with phrasing, and it may be my own incorrect interpretation. Just drawing attention to it. 213.202.164.186 ( talk) 18:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC) Dan, 30 April, 2008
One word: helooo?-- coolbho3000 ( talk) 19:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
with the prestige mode for cod 4.. after you prestige so many times do you begin to recive gamer pictures for your current prestige mode? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.109.145 ( talk) 02:06, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
in the multiplayer section it states that the result of a tie game is sudden death or completing the objective, however in the headquarters and deathmatch gametypes a tie game results in a draw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.190.109.145 ( talk) 02:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
The UK collectors edition has the poster and DVD, however, it does not have the hardback art book. I don't know about other countries so it might be worth mentioning. Douglasnicol ( talk) 23:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
It is out now. [1] 80.202.209.248 ( talk) 18:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
the article states its being released in may 2008, now its june but there is still no word about it. Chegis ( talk) 16:18, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Just how exactly was it established that Griggs was shot in the private parts? I've played through that sequence multiple times, and it does not look like Griggs was shot in the neck, since the blood splatter covers his whole head. 96.241.113.150 ( talk) 23:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Griggs was definatly shot in the head. Just beacuse there wasn't any bloody chunks it doesn't mean that he was shot in the neck. I watched Griggs death numerous times and the blood spray came out of his head. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.108.146.129 ( talk) 22:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
A lot of people seem to think that the Price that appears in the 2nd game is the same guy who appears in this game. It's been decided that CoD4 is set in 2011, Call of Duty 2 was set during the second world war so for Price to be the same guy, he would be in his 70s which is an impossible age to be if you're captain of an SAS regiment. Shouldn't something be added to the article? —— Ryan | t • c 10:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
The main antagonist for Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare is Imran Zakhaev, not Khaled-Al-Asad. Khaled Al-Asad is just the secondary antagonist. Notice that when you and your team captures Al-Asad, Zakhaev calls him(Al-Asad)on his phone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fireboy000 ( talk • contribs) 12:24, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
On the back of the box it says "This Product contains software technology licensed from ID software", which seems to be the Quake 3 engine. The competitive community picked up on this and found that bugs relating to fps (certain fps numbers let you jump slightly farther) from the Quake 3 engine still apply in CoD4. Can somebody help me find a source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeith ( talk • contribs) 21:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
ID have more than one game.( 121.217.56.178 ( talk) 05:20, 21 June 2008 (UTC))
I just noticed that the sales section gives no details on PC sales, compared to its in depth view of sales on xbox 360 and ps3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghyslyn ( talk • contribs) 06:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC) Activision can't really confirm it's PC sales because of piracy and downloads. here's article: http://kotaku.com/344848/piracy-makes-call-of-duty-4-devs-sad
http://kotaku.com/364440/pc-gamings-piracy-sales-charts —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakimstar ( talk • contribs) 09:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
This game is banned in the Middle East. I've been to All the Virgin shops here in and it's not allowed, which is Ironic seeing they allow Counter strike to go in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.150.72.34 ( talk) 13:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Xaerun: What is 'irrelevant'? Rather, it is odd that there is no 'controversy' section in this article mentioning/dealing with subconscious reinforcement of contemporary middle-eastern conflict. Al-Jazeera ran a documentary on this kind of genre of video games: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afKENY4xcM4 and how this is possibly used as a recruiting tool in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S4053674 ( talk • contribs) 13:14, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
You can repeat prestige mode nine times, if you were to repeat it ten times, you would be able to go into your eleventh prestige. I have corrected this error. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunkalax ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Dave ( talk) 16:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
You can level up a total of 540 times, because you start at level one each time you prestige and first start. Where 600 came from, I really don't know. Dunkalax ( talk) 01:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- You can actually level up 595 times because there are levels 1-55 BEFORE you prestige and then you can prestige a TOTAL of 10 times. It is a little confusing when they said you can REPEAT prestige nine times (assuming once plus nine repeats = ten total) which is technically correct. Probably should be reworded. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.171.42 ( talk) 19:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I have had almost daily contact with Aspyr Games, and the requirements have just been released. I am just a noob editor, though, and do not know enough HTML or what have you to edit the chart of system reqs. The link the the reqs is here:
http://www.aspyr.com/product/game_specs/88 J1.grammar natz ( talk) 21:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Thought I might bring this to your attention:
http://www.gamesradar.com/f/the-wtf-world-of-wikipedia/a-2008062510326553058
-- Broadbandmink ( talk) 22:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Dear fellow contributors
MOSNUM no longer encourages date autoformatting, having evolved over the past year or so from the mandatory to the optional after much discussion there and elsewhere of the disadvantages of the system. Related to this, MOSNUM prescribes rules for the raw formatting, irrespective of whether a date is autoformatted or not). MOSLINK and CONTEXT are consistent with this.
There are at least six disadvantages in using date-autoformatting, which I've capped here:
Removal has generally been met with positive responses by editors. Does anyone object if I remove it from the main text in a few days’ time on a trial basis? The original input formatting would be seen by all WPians, not just the huge number of visitors; it would be plain, unobtrusive text, which would give greater prominence to the high-value links. Tony (talk) 13:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
The image above seems to have texture resolution that wasn't set to the highest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Icyplanetnhc ( talk • contribs) 18:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Is there a movie scheduled for the game? It has a high quality scenario. I hope they consider the production of movie for it. -- Fotte ( talk) 13:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that the word "ultranaionalist" doesn't have consistent capitalization. 24.6.160.190 ( talk) 06:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hmm? ( Butters x ( talk) 20:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC))
Ehem, making a LIST of guns used in the game is NOT WP:NOT#GUIDE. ( Butters x ( talk) 15:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC))
As per all. It violates game guide. Why not add those in COD Wikia?. -- SkyWalker ( talk) 15:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
In the last level, it's unclear whether or not Soap survives the blast. However, when I played the epilogue, I assumed that the character I took control of was Soap McTavish, meaning that he DID survive the blast. Can anyone find a credible source to say that character was or was not Soap? Fresnel149 ( talk) 10:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Infinity Ward created Call of Duty 1, 2, and 4. Call of Duty 3 and the new Call of Duty are created by Treyarch. Infinity Ward had not planned to make another Call of Duty but decided to after the release of COD3 (Maybe because of the all-around concensus that it wasn't good?) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdalyspx ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
The native resolution here is said to be 720p on consoles. It's not, it is 600p. The reference is already there to an article certifying that it is 600p, it just says 720p for some reason. —— Hamish Morrison ( talk) 15:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Should there not be some kind of criticism section? Just a suggestion, I mean it reads like an advertisment for the most part. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ( Ταλκ) 14:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Would it be appropriate for this article to have reference to case of missing Ontario teen, linked to the game http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_28861.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aou ( talk • contribs) 20:35, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
I don't know, but wouldn't it be good to update the sales in the overview section (from 7 millions in January this year to 10 million units sold by June this year.)? Assuming that there are enough sources, of course. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.233.27.196 ( talk) 16:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
If the missing teen segment is re-added to the article or added elsewhere, the part concerning the teen's father needs to be changed if it still says he thought his son was serious. The reference where it was taken from mentions that the father thought his son would be back in two days with his tail between his legs; so another words he thought his son was bluffing instead of being serious. -- J Grant Fox ( talk) 07:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
You know this really annoys me when they blame Real life issues and happenings on Video games, how in the hell does what happened to this boy tie in with Call Of Duty 4?, nothing that's what, he fell from a tree probably down to playing or wanting to climb, people in the media take video gaming too seriously and I think it's very unfair to blame Video Games for anything, if he was trying to copy what they saw in the game, then that's his own fault not the game, really gets on my last nerves, he should have more responsible hell being 15 where are his parents in all this?, I feel sorry for them I do but each human being is responsible for his or her actions not some form of imitation from playing games. 91.107.166.20 ( talk) 02:14, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
They did not dislike the game. They gave it a 90%. Here is the end:
"VERDICT + Utterly spectacular + Genius in parts - Seven hours long It's smoke and mirrors and a host of cheap tricks - but, as always, it's wonderful. 90%"
HELLO, anyone editing this article? The above is true. The article is factually incorrect in their assessment of the views of Xbox World 360.
I'm deleting the phrase "which has affected the game's sales" after the part about COD4 being a big target of piracy. Just because somebody pirates a game does not mean that if piracy wasn't an option they would automatically and by logical necessity go out and pay $60+ for it. It's an absurd myth that a pirated game equals a lost sale, or that "true *would-be* sales/revenue!" can be derived from piracy figures. It's much more accurate and informative to say that pirates are "not helping" the industry that they love so much, because they're not paying for their games. You could even go so far as to say they "harm" the industry, but only by hurting the morale of some developers, not the sales figures. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.230.16 ( talk) 22:27, 7 December 2008(UTC)
I agree. It's a point of contestion, if piracy really does hurt sales much, and it's purely speculative in the article. It appears that the edit was undone, however, and I'd like to hear the other point of view before it is redone. But since it lacks a source, and since it is, more or less, speculative, I'd vouch for a deletion of that phrase as well. Synthmon ( talk) 12:59, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Not sure where or how to add this, but apparently a sequel is in the works, as shown here: [3]. Umbralcorax ( talk) 04:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Since it's locked, I'll post this here. Typo at "dynamics shadows" in the intro. 206.190.248.2 ( talk) 22:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The sales figures in this article need to be updated, Call Of Duty 4 has surpassed 14 million copies now and is the all time number one Xbox 360 game for sales as stated on their official website. 91.107.166.20 ( talk) 02:04, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
The summaries for both obscure the question as to which one was the best-selling game of 2007.-- 66.229.57.140 ( talk) 01:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
User:Mallerd recently asked me why I removed two images from the Plot section ( this one and this one). I said that I think we should try and get the most relevant images for the section, not just weapons that are used for brief scenes in the game, which is why I added the image of the Marines—I tried to find one of a SAS unit as well, but it appears that the SAS article doesn't have one. I also kept the image of Prypiat, Ukraine ( this one) because it helps to add some atmosphere to the section, in my opinion; it's particularly unique in that it shows the desolation of the place, which is pretty significant in the scene when the player is there. Thoughts on all this? Gary King ( talk) 16:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
I thought Gary should be more consequent, because the criteria he stated applied to all pictures (at least in my opinion and I can't imagine anyone thinking different). I said to him that I feel he likes to own this article with moves like that, bending himself in strange curves (is that English?). His suggestion was to move it onto this talkpage, here it is. Mallerd ( talk) 10:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Uh, why isn't his actor listed?? It says his actor at imdb..... 75.72.221.172 ( talk) 04:01, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Why does it say it's resolution is at 600p? It seems it is supported at [[ http://www.covergalaxy.com/forum/attachments/sony-ps3/5802d1227050354-call-duty-4-modern-warfare-r1-ps3-cover-dvd-cod-4-cover-3118x1748.jpg%7Cfull 1080p]], so why doesn't say so
The narrative resolution of Call of Duty 4 on consoles is 600p. You can still play it on 720 and 1080 but it is being upconverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.190.240.1 ( talk) 01:58, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
I vote we take this out, nothing runs at that FPS, it's better to say it's a 60hz game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.182.57 ( talk) 01:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
Price was in the final final level, "Mile High Club" as one of your squad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.62.231 ( talk) 21:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
If you have the slo-mo cheat unlocked, use it during the cinimatic when Kamarov arrives at the bridge to rescue you. Look at the medic with Price. With slo-mo, you can see carefully that the medic pounds Price in frustration after giving up trying to revive him, and starts to get up, and then you're are lifted into the medevac. Try it. Look carefully and you should see it. 69.114.152.45 ( talk) 01:46, 16 June 2009 (UTC)'anonymous'
Even if Price died, does it really matter? it wouldn't be the first time, (Call of Duty) or that he didn't seem to age between the early 1940's and the present —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.225.171.193 ( talk) 00:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
You're a dickhead then aren't you? It blatantly says Captain Price over his head —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.74.122 ( talk) 20:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Price survives, he is a NPC in Modern Warfare 2._Dominic_
I think the part with the plot summary should be edited at the very end. It says Price survives and plays a prominent role in MW2 but this doesn't happen until 3/4 into the game and it's a big plot twist. I would consider this last sentence a big spoiler. If I hadn't already beaten MW2 i would be upset to read this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.134.42.42 ( talk) 23:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
ok. not sure why you're so upset, we're on the talk page... it's not like i'm vandalizing the main article. I didn't see anything else in this section of the talk page regarding this as a spoiler. I apologize (not sarcastic).
Having played the game, I can tell you that it is not Price who is being revived by the medic, it is Gaz. Captain Price has a very distinctive mustache, whereas Gaz has his trademark cap. The soldier the medic is trying to revive is clearly Gaz, while it is Price who slides the pistol to Soap.-- Sem;colon ( talk) 04:41, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi, what kind of accent do captain Price and Gaz have? Mallerd ( talk) 17:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
i believe it's called a fake 'english' accent —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.11.105.228 ( talk) 18:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah well, in England you have a lot of accents. Wondered what it was: from Derbyshire, Hertfordshire. I don't know, know it sure isn't fake though. Mallerd ( talk) 00:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Price was voiced by Billy Murray and Gaz was voiced by Craig Fairbrass, both Londoners. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.196.149.21 ( talk) 23:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Price and Gaz are both from the Londoner East End. The accent is called Cockney. Cheerio Lads —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.20.54 ( talk) 19:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Defo doing cockney Londoner accents (as most Americans believe London accounts for the entire of the UK). I'm surprised Infinity Ward didn't incorporate rhyming slang. -- 92.25.194.45 ( talk) 02:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
I am pretty sure the accents are British — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
50.12.182.178 (
talk)
04:02, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
I'd like to change "while Price fired a sniper rifle" in the Plot section to "while Price fired a .50 BMG sniper rifle" (with the hypertext), just to put it into some context as to why the entire arm of Zakhaev could be blown off by a rifle shot. Any objection? Ken l lee ( talk) 04:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
No 174.112.230.127 ( talk) 01:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
It seems quite possible that the country in which Al-Fulani is is executed could be at least partially modeled on some sort of of post-monarchy Saudi Arabia. Not only does the location of President All-Fulani's execution resemble Deera Square, but at the point when Al-Assad refers to "our [country's] monarchy before the Revolution," it could be that the revolution he is referring to is his own -- that is, he may be alluding to having wiped out the royal family of his country as well. Furthermore, when there is the satellite imagery and voiceover of the SAS personnel just hearing of the execution of Al-Fulani, the imagery is much more consistent will a location in Saudi Arabia than with any another nearby possibility, such as the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. However, even though Saudi Arabia is certainly "oil-rich," it is not "small," so as might be expected, it seems extremely unlikely that the supposed county is intended to represent any place in the real word. One of the only determinations that can be made with certainty is that the country is question cannot be the Islamic Republic of Iran, because all the characters in the sequence are speaking Arabic -- none are speaking Farsi. SithiR ( talk) 19:59, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
In the plot section of this artical it says that the american command is warned of Al-Asad having a nucleur warhead by the seals however this is incorrect as it is clearly stated in the game that the intel came from the SAS, most likly from Nikoli the informant rescued by Captain Price's squad although this is not confirmed —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.189.98 ( talk) 14:49, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Can somebody with the authority to do so please remove this:
"The online play for PS3 has lately had a lot of players using Hacks ansd the website is in a tutorial on you tube but for any one who thinks this has ruined the game (like me) then according to you tube an asshole called Dark Mamatta found the hacks so blame that douch bag."
It is under the 'Multiplayer' part of the 'Gameplay' section.
Thank you.
I know that the engine's name IW 4.0 engine was confirmed for Modern Warfare 2 on IGN, but does it make CoD4's engine: IW 3.0 engine? I mean there is no absolute confirmation to affirm that...-- PhantomT1412 ( talk) 11:30, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Here in the article, it says that they disliked the game. Untrue; they gave it a 90%. Last time I brought this up, I was told to source it and edit. The source is the magazine itself, and it is sourced. This is what I gave last time as their verdict: "VERDICT + Utterly spectacular + Genius in parts - Seven hours long It's smoke and mirrors and a host of cheap tricks - but, as always, it's wonderful. 90%" I can't edit due to protection, but until the issue with the blatant lie saying that XW360 disliked the game is removed, I can't really take this article very seriously. ShaneHaughey ( talk) 00:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
206.217.9.240 ( talk) 03:35, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
I believe, that it should be stated that, the game takes place, in the years 1996 and 2011. I can backup this claim, as, before "All Ghillied Up", It was 15 years ago, and Captain Price states that it's been a decade since the Chernobyl explosion. That would claim, that they year in "All Ghillied Up" is 1996, and 15 years after that, is 2011. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.169.215.79 ( talk) 01:53, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
"Call of Duty 4 is a target of piracy, which has resulted in multiple copies of the game being illegally distributed online." This sentence is INCREDIBLY bad. EVERY video game is a "target of piracy". Hell, piracy HAS no "target". Here's a paraphrase to showcase how atrociously written it is: "Cake is a target of fat people, which has resulted in multiple recipes of the food being distributed online."
At the intro to the section the article begins listing the type of game modes in multiplayer however leaving out objective based game modes it only list team based and deathmatch I feel that needs to be added in. Also the article says that the different game modes all require unique strategies however that is not true. One team could use a simple strategy of just killing the enemy team and complete every match they play with a win or tie. This is true due to the fact that most game modes killing all enemy players in sudden death or the last round/2 minuet timer results in a win. That brings me to the final point of not game modes give a sudden death timer like the article states. Matches like team deatchmatch will soley result in the two teams tieing and the gaming ending. 70.94.249.191 ( talk) 00:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it noteworthy that there is a teddy bear located somewhere on every multiplayer map? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mynameisjimi ( talk • contribs) 23:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
There is not a teddy bear on every single map. Ambush, Bloc, Crossfire, 2 at Overgrown, Chinatown — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.190.240.1 ( talk) 01:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
A user continues to add what he thinks the year is, 2011. The references used are a wikia article, a posting on gamefaqs and imdb. These do not meet WP:RS and I have reverted the change Dbrodbeck ( talk) 12:57, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
I can't really source this (or edit the article for that matter), but Modern Warfare 2 reveals what happened to Captain Price. Somehow he ended up in a Russian gulag. In the mission "The Gulag", your goal is rescure prisoner #627, who turns out to be Price. Price joins your team, and Soap gives him back the pistol that he used to kill Zakhaev at the end of COD4. I won't spoil how Modern Warfare 2 ends, but Price will play a big part. When the game comes out, someone should update Price's fate at the end of the article's story to say that "he survived, but was imprisoned in a Russian gulag up until the events of Modern Warfare 2". 164.107.91.60 ( talk) 14:42, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not apirate, it's all on COD wiki. If naything, there the pirates over their. That's why I cant source it, because the stuff on the wiki isn't sourced. I think it's true, though. 164.107.91.223 ( talk) 18:44, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes exactly, Price's fate is not relevant to the first game's plot. So all information or speculation about the game's plot beyond what is shown in the first game should be moved to the Modern Warfare 2 page. This should include the fact that Price is alive, which no doubt belongs on the modern warfare 2 page because it is not clear from the first game's plot. You stated before that this is an encyclopedia. I agree, so let's keep the information organized and where it is supposed to be. If I want to read information about a game's plot I would like to read that plot, not another plot. Cpt.MacTavish ( talk) 03:39, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
It does mention that Price's fate is left unknown. Clarification that he survived to be in the sequel would be a no-brainer since MacTavish's fate is also clarified. We could just say that Price survived. It's short and doesn't stray into the sequel's plot. I'm getting the game tonight, I may post later to confirm that Price does reappear. =/= Ironoclast (Talk) 22:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I removed a small bit at the end of the synopsis where it revealed that Price was revealed to play a major role in the second Modern Warfare game. I felt this was necessary seeing as though many of us thought that Price had indeed died after the first game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dysenterymatt ( talk • contribs) 22:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
← In my experience, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS also applies to details in articles, so the Saint's Row argument is invalid. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 12:33, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
In the article, it mentions that a Russian medic attempts to resuscitate Price. This is incorrect. He was trying to resusitate Gaz, as Price was concious —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.226.41 ( talk) 07:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
In section 2.2, paragraph 1: manifest should link to the following page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest#Industry Derekawesome ( talk) 00:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
"It was the top-selling game worldwide for 2007, reaching over seven million copies by January 2008, and over 13 million by May 2009.[3]"
According to the 2007 in video gaming it was outsold by both Halo 3 and Wii Play.
WesUGAdawg ( talk) 21:49, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Somebody needs to sign their post!!!! Uncle Soprano ( talk) 23:39, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Anyone think the upgraded AI system should be mentioned? Uncle Soprano ( talk) 02:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Why is this game described as a "first person shooter/romance" game in the beginning of the article? What does romance have to do with it? --JZAONE (sorry don't know how to sign my discussion yet)
Under "Development" the article says, "Call of Duty 4 was developed by a team of a hundred people, over the course of two hundred years." I don't know much about the game, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't in development since the Napoleonic Wars. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.232.73 ( talk) 17:12, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Why is ewerhwhere here written about some Ultranationalists?
Russian Ultranationalists don't wish to restore USSR, and many of them hate this period of our history. Some of them even want to cut off Northern Caucasus as non-Russian home of hated islamic Caucasians. And Chechen Imran Zakhaev (his name is Chechen) cannot be leader of Russian nationalists - this is a nonsense like a Black leader of Aryan Nation.
In-Game Russian insurgents can be Communists of some sort, or Eurasianists (like Alexander Dugin) - but not Ultranationalists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.81.185.23 ( talk) 15:42, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
In the 'Retail versions' section, it states that "The PlayStation 3 version included the Variety map pack on the disc, and while the Xbox 360 Game of the Year edition initially included an insert in the packaging which could be redeemed on Xbox Live Marketplace to download the Variety map pack, later releases did not contain the inserts, and so were no different from the original release of the game."
However this isn't correct, the PS3 version does not include the variety map pack on the disc. Like the Xbox 360 version, initially an insert was included with a unique keycode to obtain the first Call Of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Map Pack for free. Later releases did not.
The release which includes the insert has a circle on the bottom right hand corner of the cover with the words "FREE *4 New multiplayer maps" ( http://au.gamespot.com/ps3/action/callofduty4modernwarfare/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B0).
203.32.16.176 ( talk) 04:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC) Milto 28/01/2011
gaz was a great guy and was shot to death for no reason. i like the g36c's though —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.76.41.58 ( talk) 04:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
The article should mention somewhere the character Captain Price in Call of Duty the original. He's a main character who appears in the American and British campaign as a British soldier, he's even got the signature Price mustache. I assume he's implied to be the Modern Warfare Price's father. Someone with more experience contributing to Wikipedia pages than I could add this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.30.176.16 ( talk) 04:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I think the plot section is too long and should be trimmed down a bit to make it concise- SCB '92 ( talk) 16:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
I know the years Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2 take place in have long been the source of speculation, well now they've finally been confirmed in Modern Warfare 3. The mission "Blood Brothers" shows flashbacks of events that occurred in COD4 and MW2 with actual dates attached to them. The flashback of the Zakhaev assassination attempt in Prypiat (COD4 mission "One shot. One kill") is labelled as "winter 1996". The flashback of the nuclear detonation in the middle east (COD4 mission "Shock and awe") is labelled as "2011". Finally, the flashback of the Zakhaev airport massacre scene (MW2 mission "No Russian") is labelled "2016". These had long been the speculated dates, but now that they're actually confirmed, I was thinking they could be added into the COD4 and MW2 articles. Splew ( talk) 20:15, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
I can't help but wonder if "Gaz" is based off a man of the same name in Andy Mcnab's Immediate action, and can't help but wonder as well whether it would be useful to try to find some information about how they designed the characters. 109.156.192.4 ( talk) 14:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
We need to protect mw2's page too, why is this protected when its 5 years old, when mw2 is up and free? Just wondering. =) 140.198.46.138 ( talk) 00:19, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Reading through this article I've noticed that when referring back to the title of the game, Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare, Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare are used all over the place. Can we reach consensus on how the article refers back to and edit the article to reflect this? CR4ZE ( talk) 08:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Modern Warfare is a game [...] Modern Warfare features [...] Modern Warfare received [...] Modern Warfare was subjected to [...] Modern Warfare made it so [...] The Modern Warfare update [...]
and use that as indicator that there is no repetition. I don't think anyone said we can't use other pronouns or descriptors. — HELLKNOWZ ▎ TALK 20:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)Modern Warfare is a game [...] Among the core features are [...] The game received [...] Gameplay became a subject to [...] The developers made it so [...] The first update [...]
Hi.
I just made a mass revert to four edits added hours ago. Here is an extended explanation of why. Basically, the edits:
For example, in the first sentence:
In 2011, a civil war has broken out in Russia between its current government and Ultranationalists
"Current" is superfluous. Certainly, "its government" never means "its past government" because if it is past, it is no longer government. Same goes for additions like:
Then we get to more grave issues.
As U.S. Marines invade the palace, the Marines engage Al-Asad's ground forces.
Seriously, how can Marines both invade the place and meanwhile engage ground forces elsewhere? They can't; the original text was correct. SEALs and their EOD team invade the palace. Marines stay in the city.
Finally, in violation of WP:IINFO, a lot of character names were added and attempt was made to dramatize the ending. As IINFO explains, these additions only make sense to those who already know about them and only serve to detract from the focus of article on Zakhaev.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (
talk)
06:56, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 15 external links on
Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:50, 22 February 2016 (UTC)