From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleCall of Duty 2 was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 15, 2006 WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 17, 2007 Good article reassessmentKept
September 22, 2007 Good article nomineeListed
November 26, 2008 Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 16, 2011 Peer reviewReviewed
February 20, 2012 Good article nomineeListed
April 13, 2012 Peer reviewReviewed
February 17, 2024 Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Xbox 360 Release Date

Call of Duty 2 was released on Nov 22 in North America, and not on Nov 17. http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Games/Xbox360Games?page=34&sortby=ReleaseDate

Pls correct this. Thanks

112.209.142.226 ( talk) 16:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Done. Huon ( talk) 19:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC) reply

GA Reassessment

Call of Duty 2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch Watch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Real4jyy ( talk) 13:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC) reply

While this article isn't in the worst state ever, I've questioned the GA status on it for a while now. My issues with the article include the Gameplay section consisting of some pretty faulty sourcing, the Plot section having weird writing, a completely separate section for a seemingly trivial advertisement controversy, and several smaller bits of the article not having any sourcing at all (ex. nothing in the article verifies the game as being considered one of the best of all time, and sourcing the Wikipedia list isn't an acceptable means of verification.)

I personally feel this article to fall more in line with a C-Class article than a GA at this current point in time, though I do think that if someone were to really put in the effort, it could be whipped into shape. λ Negative MP1 05:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleCall of Duty 2 was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 15, 2006 WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 17, 2007 Good article reassessmentKept
September 22, 2007 Good article nomineeListed
November 26, 2008 Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 16, 2011 Peer reviewReviewed
February 20, 2012 Good article nomineeListed
April 13, 2012 Peer reviewReviewed
February 17, 2024 Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Xbox 360 Release Date

Call of Duty 2 was released on Nov 22 in North America, and not on Nov 17. http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Games/Xbox360Games?page=34&sortby=ReleaseDate

Pls correct this. Thanks

112.209.142.226 ( talk) 16:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Done. Huon ( talk) 19:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC) reply

GA Reassessment

Call of Duty 2

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch Watch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Real4jyy ( talk) 13:19, 17 February 2024 (UTC) reply

While this article isn't in the worst state ever, I've questioned the GA status on it for a while now. My issues with the article include the Gameplay section consisting of some pretty faulty sourcing, the Plot section having weird writing, a completely separate section for a seemingly trivial advertisement controversy, and several smaller bits of the article not having any sourcing at all (ex. nothing in the article verifies the game as being considered one of the best of all time, and sourcing the Wikipedia list isn't an acceptable means of verification.)

I personally feel this article to fall more in line with a C-Class article than a GA at this current point in time, though I do think that if someone were to really put in the effort, it could be whipped into shape. λ Negative MP1 05:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook