 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Invitation for bid page were merged into Call for bids on 29 August 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Should
/info/en/?search=Invitation_for_bid ,
/info/en/?search=Call_for_bids ,
/info/en/?search=Request_for_quotation , and
/info/en/?search=Request_for_proposal be merged, with a section in which the differences between them are explained? One good article might be better than four less developed ones.
Davidlark (
talk)
18:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I think that /info/en/?search=Invitation_for_bid , /info/en/?search=Call_for_bids and /info/en/?search=Request_for_tender should be merged in /info/en/?search=Call_for_bids . "Call for bids" gives 369 000 Google results, whilst "Invitation for bid" gives only 345 000.
In addition, /info/en/?search=Tendering is redirected to /info/en/?search=Procurement, and it ought to be redirected to /info/en/?search=Call_for_bids
But /info/en/?search=Request_for_quotation , /info/en/?search=Request_for_proposal and other pages on this type of requests should be left alone, because they are different methods which can be used within a call for bids. It is important that the articles on these particular methods to be short, because this allows to spot the differences more easily. -- Alvarosinde ( talk) 11:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merged as proposed above. - BobKilcoyne ( talk) 05:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| The contents of the Invitation for bid page were merged into Call for bids on 29 August 2018. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Archives ( Index) |
|
This page is archived by
ClueBot III.
|
Should
/info/en/?search=Invitation_for_bid ,
/info/en/?search=Call_for_bids ,
/info/en/?search=Request_for_quotation , and
/info/en/?search=Request_for_proposal be merged, with a section in which the differences between them are explained? One good article might be better than four less developed ones.
Davidlark (
talk)
18:54, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I think that /info/en/?search=Invitation_for_bid , /info/en/?search=Call_for_bids and /info/en/?search=Request_for_tender should be merged in /info/en/?search=Call_for_bids . "Call for bids" gives 369 000 Google results, whilst "Invitation for bid" gives only 345 000.
In addition, /info/en/?search=Tendering is redirected to /info/en/?search=Procurement, and it ought to be redirected to /info/en/?search=Call_for_bids
But /info/en/?search=Request_for_quotation , /info/en/?search=Request_for_proposal and other pages on this type of requests should be left alone, because they are different methods which can be used within a call for bids. It is important that the articles on these particular methods to be short, because this allows to spot the differences more easily. -- Alvarosinde ( talk) 11:38, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
- Merged as proposed above. - BobKilcoyne ( talk) 05:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)