This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
California Air Resources Board article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
:::Suggest someone go in and try to clean up this article. It appears weasels have gone in and made edits or changes without any citations or mention of factual documents where they received the data. Please see the "controversy" section. 24.251.84.221 08:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
It would appear that the CARB are monitoring this article and continually removing the "controversy" section. 11 May 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.8.36 ( talk) 17:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Which other states have adopted these standards? For great justice. 17:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Is it the CARB that declares "save the air day", or is that a county thing? If it is, some mention of STADs would be a nice addition here. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 00:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Is the same the g/km (European Union) of g/mi (California) ? : (g/km= g/mi * 0,621371192). Is it a raw conversion ?. Perhaps, we would need common standards, to compare.-- Altermike 13:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
It's no coincidence that the acronym for this agency is "CARB" which is the mechanic's shorthand for carburetor, the very same simple and efficient device that it sadly doomed. Cars with computer-controlled carburetors are actually more energy efficient than fuel injected cars, because of their ability to employ a low-pressure pump that flows gasoline, instead of one that must maintain enormous back pressure against a valve that must be rapidly switched on and off. Why? Because of the lack of an intersection between those who were able to understand the internal engineering of this device, and those actually willing to perform work on them for a reasonable wage. Now, we have diagnostic codes that tell mechanics which doo-dad to replace first, second, third... until finally, the problem goes away.
CARB just resulted in more disposable thinking from a throw-away society, and the only benefit is a reduction in "air pollution" that doesn't actually stay in the environment for longer than a few days after its emission (it photodegrades, eventually becoming harmless). Zaphraud ( talk) 23:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
http://www.killcarb.org/ Is not a reliable source.
"The California Air Resources Board has generated controversy as its regulations increasingly create hardships" -- that is certainly not NPOV. EdwinHJ | Talk 18:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
How is it that "California Emissions Control" redirects here...yet the page fails to provide a link to the state laws governing vehicle emissions? -- 72.47.85.102 ( talk) 07:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I think it's fair to say that the Controversy section can be trimmed down a little. There are going to be people putting in 'citiation needed' for everything that's common sense. You don't need a citation to tell you that enacting tougher emission standards on an already bad economy only makes things worse. Especially when the information your using is fake or of people with papermill degrees. Woods01 ( talk) 10:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California Air Resources Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://nytimes.com/aponline/2009/04/24/us/AP-US-Low-Carbon-Fuel.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on California Air Resources Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
California Air Resources Board article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
:::Suggest someone go in and try to clean up this article. It appears weasels have gone in and made edits or changes without any citations or mention of factual documents where they received the data. Please see the "controversy" section. 24.251.84.221 08:15, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
It would appear that the CARB are monitoring this article and continually removing the "controversy" section. 11 May 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.101.8.36 ( talk) 17:59, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Which other states have adopted these standards? For great justice. 17:33, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Is it the CARB that declares "save the air day", or is that a county thing? If it is, some mention of STADs would be a nice addition here. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 00:40, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Is the same the g/km (European Union) of g/mi (California) ? : (g/km= g/mi * 0,621371192). Is it a raw conversion ?. Perhaps, we would need common standards, to compare.-- Altermike 13:12, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
It's no coincidence that the acronym for this agency is "CARB" which is the mechanic's shorthand for carburetor, the very same simple and efficient device that it sadly doomed. Cars with computer-controlled carburetors are actually more energy efficient than fuel injected cars, because of their ability to employ a low-pressure pump that flows gasoline, instead of one that must maintain enormous back pressure against a valve that must be rapidly switched on and off. Why? Because of the lack of an intersection between those who were able to understand the internal engineering of this device, and those actually willing to perform work on them for a reasonable wage. Now, we have diagnostic codes that tell mechanics which doo-dad to replace first, second, third... until finally, the problem goes away.
CARB just resulted in more disposable thinking from a throw-away society, and the only benefit is a reduction in "air pollution" that doesn't actually stay in the environment for longer than a few days after its emission (it photodegrades, eventually becoming harmless). Zaphraud ( talk) 23:56, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
http://www.killcarb.org/ Is not a reliable source.
"The California Air Resources Board has generated controversy as its regulations increasingly create hardships" -- that is certainly not NPOV. EdwinHJ | Talk 18:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
How is it that "California Emissions Control" redirects here...yet the page fails to provide a link to the state laws governing vehicle emissions? -- 72.47.85.102 ( talk) 07:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I think it's fair to say that the Controversy section can be trimmed down a little. There are going to be people putting in 'citiation needed' for everything that's common sense. You don't need a citation to tell you that enacting tougher emission standards on an already bad economy only makes things worse. Especially when the information your using is fake or of people with papermill degrees. Woods01 ( talk) 10:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California Air Resources Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://nytimes.com/aponline/2009/04/24/us/AP-US-Low-Carbon-Fuel.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 06:27, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on California Air Resources Board. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:51, 4 September 2017 (UTC)