Cahiers du Cinéma's Top Ten Films was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 July 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Cahiers du Cinéma. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was Rohmer Cahiers' first editor? I'd always heard that Bazin was and that Rohmer took over after Bazin's death. -- Jeremy Butler 12:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
I am moving this line from the Young Turks disambig page, as there is no mention of this phrase at the target article here. perhaps with some research this can be added:
Yes the phrase is used in association with the the French New Wave and the directors that were part of the magazine and is noted in various sources including the Harvard Film Review translation. Some more research will have to done to figure out who exactly it's referring to: a lot of the sources mention the main writers, Godard, Truffaut, Rohmer, Chabrol, but many just mention New Wave Directors in general. I think it's more of a concept rather than a specific group of people, referring to French New Wave directors and the type of people they were. Opencooper ( talk) 13:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Is the second "c" in the title supposed to be capitalized? The article title doesn't do it and neither does the french Wikipedia. However, the article text does capitalize it. The Harvard Film Studies translation also capitalized it. One would presume that since this is a publication it would be in titlecase rather than Wikipedia's sentence-case preference for titles. Whichever we choose, the title should be consistent throughout. Opencooper ( talk) 13:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Wouldn't the lists be considered copyrighted property of Cahiers du cinéma and, hence, not appropriate for including in an article? Trivialist ( talk) 22:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm adding additional material to the History section of the page, with the intent of clarifying and expanding greatly upon the page's recounting of the early history of the magazine. Douglas Firs ( talk) 19:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Cahiers du Cinéma's Top Ten Films was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 July 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Cahiers du Cinéma. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Was Rohmer Cahiers' first editor? I'd always heard that Bazin was and that Rohmer took over after Bazin's death. -- Jeremy Butler 12:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
I am moving this line from the Young Turks disambig page, as there is no mention of this phrase at the target article here. perhaps with some research this can be added:
Yes the phrase is used in association with the the French New Wave and the directors that were part of the magazine and is noted in various sources including the Harvard Film Review translation. Some more research will have to done to figure out who exactly it's referring to: a lot of the sources mention the main writers, Godard, Truffaut, Rohmer, Chabrol, but many just mention New Wave Directors in general. I think it's more of a concept rather than a specific group of people, referring to French New Wave directors and the type of people they were. Opencooper ( talk) 13:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Is the second "c" in the title supposed to be capitalized? The article title doesn't do it and neither does the french Wikipedia. However, the article text does capitalize it. The Harvard Film Studies translation also capitalized it. One would presume that since this is a publication it would be in titlecase rather than Wikipedia's sentence-case preference for titles. Whichever we choose, the title should be consistent throughout. Opencooper ( talk) 13:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Wouldn't the lists be considered copyrighted property of Cahiers du cinéma and, hence, not appropriate for including in an article? Trivialist ( talk) 22:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm adding additional material to the History section of the page, with the intent of clarifying and expanding greatly upon the page's recounting of the early history of the magazine. Douglas Firs ( talk) 19:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)