It has been suggested that the CR2032 article be merged into List of battery sizes. I do not agree. CR2032 is so popular that it deserves its own article as it is now. As an example: I wanted to learn more about CR2032, so I opened google and I typed in "CR " and google suggested CR 2032 and it was correct. YMMV Pokyrek ( talk) 19:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- And what did you learn about it? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 23:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I do not agree that this should be merged, this article gices detail inculding capacity which the main article does not. suggest that main article shows capacity of batteries such as CR 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.224.133.219 ( talk) 15:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe the CR(width height) system should be expanded on. Not sure if a good reference can be found, but cards of batteries from fixed price stores often contain some CR2032, CR2025 and CR2016 - and a thinner version will be loose in a holder for a thicker, while a thicker version may spaly the contact if forced into a holder for a thinner version.
Ace of Risk (
talk)
17:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- The article Battery nomenclature describes the IEC and ANSI systems for naming battery sizes. -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 21:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The external links are labeled as if they have battery specifications from a standards body, but they are just shoddy websites for "battery holder" manufacturers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RikkiKarmacide ( talk) 08:21, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
- I removed one spam link, the other links seem legitimate. AleyCZ ( talk) 16:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
ResolvedPerhaps it should be mentioned that the common Duracell DL2032 is the same as a CR2032 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.164.145.199 ( talk) 07:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed. Done. -- Chealer ( talk) 12:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
What about LIR2032, the Li-Ion Rechargeable version of CR2032? -- Radu C. Asandei ( talk) 12:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
I am not quite sure, if the lower self-discharge rate of BR2032 compared with CR2032 is relevant, because as far as I know CR2032 cells also have a self-discharge rate of under 2% per year at standard temperature (normally 20°C). This is neglectable for almost all applications. -- MrBurns ( talk) 02:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Why is this being discussed in such detail in this article? It reads like an advertisement for Panasonic's proprietary battery. Maxvip ( talk) 17:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
It has been suggested that the CR2032 article be merged into List of battery sizes. I do not agree. CR2032 is so popular that it deserves its own article as it is now. As an example: I wanted to learn more about CR2032, so I opened google and I typed in "CR " and google suggested CR 2032 and it was correct. YMMV Pokyrek ( talk) 19:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
- And what did you learn about it? -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 23:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
I do not agree that this should be merged, this article gices detail inculding capacity which the main article does not. suggest that main article shows capacity of batteries such as CR 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.224.133.219 ( talk) 15:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe the CR(width height) system should be expanded on. Not sure if a good reference can be found, but cards of batteries from fixed price stores often contain some CR2032, CR2025 and CR2016 - and a thinner version will be loose in a holder for a thicker, while a thicker version may spaly the contact if forced into a holder for a thinner version.
Ace of Risk (
talk)
17:32, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
- The article Battery nomenclature describes the IEC and ANSI systems for naming battery sizes. -- Wtshymanski ( talk) 21:29, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The external links are labeled as if they have battery specifications from a standards body, but they are just shoddy websites for "battery holder" manufacturers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RikkiKarmacide ( talk) 08:21, 10 May 2012 (EDT)
- I removed one spam link, the other links seem legitimate. AleyCZ ( talk) 16:40, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
ResolvedPerhaps it should be mentioned that the common Duracell DL2032 is the same as a CR2032 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.164.145.199 ( talk) 07:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Indeed. Done. -- Chealer ( talk) 12:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
What about LIR2032, the Li-Ion Rechargeable version of CR2032? -- Radu C. Asandei ( talk) 12:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
I am not quite sure, if the lower self-discharge rate of BR2032 compared with CR2032 is relevant, because as far as I know CR2032 cells also have a self-discharge rate of under 2% per year at standard temperature (normally 20°C). This is neglectable for almost all applications. -- MrBurns ( talk) 02:08, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
Why is this being discussed in such detail in this article? It reads like an advertisement for Panasonic's proprietary battery. Maxvip ( talk) 17:09, 3 January 2015 (UTC)