This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page has his record as 3-0-2, but he was the head coach for 4 matches from 2014-15 whenever Yallop was suspended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donutcity ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
If they're linking to the Impact page, they're referring to them as the Impact, and they've openly stated the name of the team will be Impact, why wouldn't we put the article at Montreal Impact (MLS) or some variation? There is no question about what the name is for the new team. Gateman1997 ( talk) 20:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Taken from the FAQ at montrealmls2012.com:
Q: Will the Impact keep its branding, including the name “Impact” and its 3 championship stars, once the leap will be made in MLS?
- At the present moment, the organization’s intention is to maintain its name and global team image. [1]
And with that, I believe it is safe to say this team for the foreseeable future will be named the Montreal Impact. Not only does the Montreal MLS 2012 website explicitly say they will keep the Impact name, but throughout the space the future MLS team is consistently referred to as the "Montreal Impact". There is never any skirting around the issue as to what they will be called like in Vancouver. I believe this is a similar situation to Portland where they have said they will keep the "Portland Timbers" brand but could ultimately have a slightly different official name (e.g. Portland Timbers FC, etc.) This Montreal MLS club should be called the Impact with "Montreal Impact (MLS)" as an appropriate article title. -- Blackbox77 ( talk) 20:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
As of right now, we know there will be a team in MLS in 2012 using the name "Montreal Impact" in some form. Therefore changing the article's name to "Montreal Impact (MLS)" is a reasonable course of action. Below are references backing up this statement.
With this evidence, I think it is safe to name this article "Montreal Impact (MLS)." Since "Montreal MLS 2012" is not the name of anything and the club has not wavered from referring to its future self as the Impact, the onus is on those who disagree to prove why this not true – not the other way around. -- Blackbox77 ( talk) 06:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Since the 2011 NASL season is over, I'm proposing the following article moves:
A fuller discussion is at the talk page for the current "Montreal Impact" article. I'll also mention it at WikiProject Football. — Dale Arnett ( talk) 19:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC) Update: Looks like the process to post to WP Football is more convoluted than I thought. — Dale Arnett ( talk) 19:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Montreal Impact - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 23:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
why there is not club culture section yet?--> — Bouncenick 14:51, 3 Décembre 2011 2011 (UTC)
What is "culture" even supposed to be?
The template is pretty terrible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.163.62 ( talk) 05:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Should we be including Brian Ching on the team roster? He has publicly stated several times and in several sources that he will never play a game for Montreal and is in fact retiring as a Houston Dynamo. 24.165.11.137 ( talk) 16:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
There was a discussion about the new roster format and we have had a trial at both the Timbers and Whitecaps articles and recently Cascadia Cup rival Sounders have converted. The idea is to move all club articles on Wikipedia to the new format as is discussed in the original discussion and more recently at the football project.
My suggestion is to complete the MLS team articles first, so if you could respond at this discussion, that would be ideal. In short, the new layout is slightly taller and less wide, but it correctly impliments WP:MOSFLAG and is better for visually impared users of Wikipedia and others who use readers. I plan to implement the change to this article by the weekend of January 20-22, however other editors could make the change sooner. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
The "name" section discusses the club keeping its NASL name, but doesn't explain why that name was chosen in the first place. 12.239.145.114 ( talk) 01:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Montreal Impact. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Dzemaili was actually on loan at Bologna from the Montreal Impact and not the contrary. I have edited the roster to demonstrate that fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlimar ( talk • contribs) 15:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Full name is in both languages and thus should be represented in the infobox. Only having the English name is misleading. TrailBlzr ( talk) 22:28, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
User:Walter Görlitz, I saw you reverted my edit about the team announcing they will be changing their name, but I don't understand why. It has been confirmed by the team and I cited a Reliable Source (Major League Soccer), which cites a direct quote from the team. This is, in my opinion, extremely relevant information pertaining to the team, and is not speculation or rumour, but verified information, which should thus be included in the article. You cited WP:NOTNEWS, but I don't see how that applies. It's not routine information, like what happened in a match, but a major fact that will impact the long-term notability of the team. RedPatchBoy ( talk) 22:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to CF Montréal. No such user ( talk) 13:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Club de Foot Montréal →
CF Montréal – place as common name. They won't be using the full name all the time, instead will most commonly go by CF Montréal. This rename will be consistant with club names across wikipedia and wikipedia standard naming conventions
RedPatchBoy (
talk) 16:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Montreal Impact (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 13:11, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The crest currently displayed in the article doesn't go into effect until the 2023 MLS season. Should it be reverted to the current crest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixo45 ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Messy Thinking ( talk) 20:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC) I am told that this is the first-ever Montreal area major league sports franchise, if not among the first, in which red is not used in any manner. I have seen at least one such franchise not use blue, but never any that doesn't use red.
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This page has his record as 3-0-2, but he was the head coach for 4 matches from 2014-15 whenever Yallop was suspended. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donutcity ( talk • contribs) 17:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
If they're linking to the Impact page, they're referring to them as the Impact, and they've openly stated the name of the team will be Impact, why wouldn't we put the article at Montreal Impact (MLS) or some variation? There is no question about what the name is for the new team. Gateman1997 ( talk) 20:47, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Taken from the FAQ at montrealmls2012.com:
Q: Will the Impact keep its branding, including the name “Impact” and its 3 championship stars, once the leap will be made in MLS?
- At the present moment, the organization’s intention is to maintain its name and global team image. [1]
And with that, I believe it is safe to say this team for the foreseeable future will be named the Montreal Impact. Not only does the Montreal MLS 2012 website explicitly say they will keep the Impact name, but throughout the space the future MLS team is consistently referred to as the "Montreal Impact". There is never any skirting around the issue as to what they will be called like in Vancouver. I believe this is a similar situation to Portland where they have said they will keep the "Portland Timbers" brand but could ultimately have a slightly different official name (e.g. Portland Timbers FC, etc.) This Montreal MLS club should be called the Impact with "Montreal Impact (MLS)" as an appropriate article title. -- Blackbox77 ( talk) 20:48, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
As of right now, we know there will be a team in MLS in 2012 using the name "Montreal Impact" in some form. Therefore changing the article's name to "Montreal Impact (MLS)" is a reasonable course of action. Below are references backing up this statement.
With this evidence, I think it is safe to name this article "Montreal Impact (MLS)." Since "Montreal MLS 2012" is not the name of anything and the club has not wavered from referring to its future self as the Impact, the onus is on those who disagree to prove why this not true – not the other way around. -- Blackbox77 ( talk) 06:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Since the 2011 NASL season is over, I'm proposing the following article moves:
A fuller discussion is at the talk page for the current "Montreal Impact" article. I'll also mention it at WikiProject Football. — Dale Arnett ( talk) 19:44, 20 November 2011 (UTC) Update: Looks like the process to post to WP Football is more convoluted than I thought. — Dale Arnett ( talk) 19:48, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Montreal Impact - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 23:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
why there is not club culture section yet?--> — Bouncenick 14:51, 3 Décembre 2011 2011 (UTC)
What is "culture" even supposed to be?
The template is pretty terrible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.163.62 ( talk) 05:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
Should we be including Brian Ching on the team roster? He has publicly stated several times and in several sources that he will never play a game for Montreal and is in fact retiring as a Houston Dynamo. 24.165.11.137 ( talk) 16:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
There was a discussion about the new roster format and we have had a trial at both the Timbers and Whitecaps articles and recently Cascadia Cup rival Sounders have converted. The idea is to move all club articles on Wikipedia to the new format as is discussed in the original discussion and more recently at the football project.
My suggestion is to complete the MLS team articles first, so if you could respond at this discussion, that would be ideal. In short, the new layout is slightly taller and less wide, but it correctly impliments WP:MOSFLAG and is better for visually impared users of Wikipedia and others who use readers. I plan to implement the change to this article by the weekend of January 20-22, however other editors could make the change sooner. -- Walter Görlitz ( talk) 17:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
The "name" section discusses the club keeping its NASL name, but doesn't explain why that name was chosen in the first place. 12.239.145.114 ( talk) 01:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Montreal Impact. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 09:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Dzemaili was actually on loan at Bologna from the Montreal Impact and not the contrary. I have edited the roster to demonstrate that fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vlimar ( talk • contribs) 15:12, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Full name is in both languages and thus should be represented in the infobox. Only having the English name is misleading. TrailBlzr ( talk) 22:28, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
User:Walter Görlitz, I saw you reverted my edit about the team announcing they will be changing their name, but I don't understand why. It has been confirmed by the team and I cited a Reliable Source (Major League Soccer), which cites a direct quote from the team. This is, in my opinion, extremely relevant information pertaining to the team, and is not speculation or rumour, but verified information, which should thus be included in the article. You cited WP:NOTNEWS, but I don't see how that applies. It's not routine information, like what happened in a match, but a major fact that will impact the long-term notability of the team. RedPatchBoy ( talk) 22:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move to CF Montréal. No such user ( talk) 13:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Club de Foot Montréal →
CF Montréal – place as common name. They won't be using the full name all the time, instead will most commonly go by CF Montréal. This rename will be consistant with club names across wikipedia and wikipedia standard naming conventions
RedPatchBoy (
talk) 16:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Montreal Impact (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 13:11, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
The crest currently displayed in the article doesn't go into effect until the 2023 MLS season. Should it be reverted to the current crest? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mixo45 ( talk • contribs) 17:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Messy Thinking ( talk) 20:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC) I am told that this is the first-ever Montreal area major league sports franchise, if not among the first, in which red is not used in any manner. I have seen at least one such franchise not use blue, but never any that doesn't use red.