 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
I feel that saying "Busch is far superior to all its competitors" is an opinionated statement.
There is no mention of what the ingredients are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.160.219 ( talk) 13:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Really? Does this honestly belong on wikipedia? A drinking game? I think saying it's cheap cost lends itself to drinking games for young men and women is fine; it's completely unencyclopedic to have something as anecdotal as this "Busch Light Classic"Stever Augustus 23:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will disagree - according to the conflict presented by the existence of both WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NOCOMMON, I think we can safely support this aspect of the article staying in. Plus, no one who drinks Busch Beer reads wikipedia anyway. 141.161.69.232 ( talk) 02:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
I feel that saying "Busch is far superior to all its competitors" is an opinionated statement.
There is no mention of what the ingredients are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.84.160.219 ( talk) 13:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Really? Does this honestly belong on wikipedia? A drinking game? I think saying it's cheap cost lends itself to drinking games for young men and women is fine; it's completely unencyclopedic to have something as anecdotal as this "Busch Light Classic"Stever Augustus 23:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- I will disagree - according to the conflict presented by the existence of both WP:COMMONSENSE and WP:NOCOMMON, I think we can safely support this aspect of the article staying in. Plus, no one who drinks Busch Beer reads wikipedia anyway. 141.161.69.232 ( talk) 02:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)