Burhanuddin Harahap is a former
featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the
archive.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1957, Burhanuddin Harahap's family members travelled from Sumatra to Jakarta, believing that he had died?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is based mostly on off-line books, AGF for no plagiarism and hook source. Hook is not overly interesting but not so poor to stop promotion of this well-researched article. Good work! P 1 9 9✉14:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Sources all look reliable and images are appropriately licensed; I have not reviewed the images in the navbox at the end.
Oh yeah, about that, I just remembered that the navbox tends to break in low res screens, so I reverted it to not contain any images.
"would involve him being nonactivated from vice-presidency": I don't know what this means.
Reworded. Better now?
"they both had South Tapanuli": I don't know what this means.
Missed a few words there. Fixed
Suggest linking Aceh.
Done
I think it would be worth making clear that the Second Ali Sastroamidjojo cabinet did not include Harahap -- currently we only say that most members of Harahap's cabinet were excluded.
Fair enough, done
"due to his cabinet's economic policy which was perceived to benefit": the policy is over a year in the past, so this would make more sense as "which was perceived to have benefited".
Burhanuddin Harahap is a former
featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the
archive.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in 1957, Burhanuddin Harahap's family members travelled from Sumatra to Jakarta, believing that he had died?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Indonesia and
Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is based mostly on off-line books, AGF for no plagiarism and hook source. Hook is not overly interesting but not so poor to stop promotion of this well-researched article. Good work! P 1 9 9✉14:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Sources all look reliable and images are appropriately licensed; I have not reviewed the images in the navbox at the end.
Oh yeah, about that, I just remembered that the navbox tends to break in low res screens, so I reverted it to not contain any images.
"would involve him being nonactivated from vice-presidency": I don't know what this means.
Reworded. Better now?
"they both had South Tapanuli": I don't know what this means.
Missed a few words there. Fixed
Suggest linking Aceh.
Done
I think it would be worth making clear that the Second Ali Sastroamidjojo cabinet did not include Harahap -- currently we only say that most members of Harahap's cabinet were excluded.
Fair enough, done
"due to his cabinet's economic policy which was perceived to benefit": the policy is over a year in the past, so this would make more sense as "which was perceived to have benefited".