This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would welcome both of the proposed mergers, if the "TM dispute" article would then be arranged consistently. However, even after the merger the information would be rather superficial. The whole article would need some revamping concerning the legal questions. After all, it's one of the important cases on geographical indications WEEM 06:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The title is POV because its not a trademark dispute. The American company is using a mark of geographic origin it is not entitled to use (unless it opens a brewery in Budweis) in any country with proper consumer protection laws which they managed to register with a (presumably) monolingual trademark office employee who didn't know what it meant. If I found some spurious office in Africa or somewhere to register me "champagne" as a trademark would the ensuing conflict with the French winegrowers also be a trademark dispute rather than a mark of geographic origin dispute?
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 04:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion relevant to this article at Talk:Budweiser#Requested move June 6 2020. Tammbeck talk 13:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I would welcome both of the proposed mergers, if the "TM dispute" article would then be arranged consistently. However, even after the merger the information would be rather superficial. The whole article would need some revamping concerning the legal questions. After all, it's one of the important cases on geographical indications WEEM 06:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The title is POV because its not a trademark dispute. The American company is using a mark of geographic origin it is not entitled to use (unless it opens a brewery in Budweis) in any country with proper consumer protection laws which they managed to register with a (presumably) monolingual trademark office employee who didn't know what it meant. If I found some spurious office in Africa or somewhere to register me "champagne" as a trademark would the ensuing conflict with the French winegrowers also be a trademark dispute rather than a mark of geographic origin dispute?
This article talk page was automatically added with {{ WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot ( talk) 04:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
There is a move discussion relevant to this article at Talk:Budweiser#Requested move June 6 2020. Tammbeck talk 13:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)