![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I have reformated the page, added the template, and edited some English but apart from that left the original text vitually untouched. I find it very Eurosceptic and thus lacking in neutrality. The article does not give room to show the efforts of the Commission to tackle these problems. In addition to the slanted view I find that the author has not cited sources sufficiently, e.g. for the 10% of the budget that is supposed to be subject to corruption.
Before making an attempt at improving the neutrality I wanted to hear the opinion of others here.
-- Drdan 10:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
I have restructured the page, edited some of the English, removed passages that did not have cited backing, replaced some terminology with the technically correct version, and added quite a few links. Still I find the language and the article as a whole to be slanted towards the Eurocritical standpoint. The Bonde webpage is references a little too often as well.
-- Drdan 09:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Have rewritten article to make it NPOV. Have changed title for same reason. Also redirected from OLAF to this article. Marcus22 14:01, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Accountability in the European Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I have reformated the page, added the template, and edited some English but apart from that left the original text vitually untouched. I find it very Eurosceptic and thus lacking in neutrality. The article does not give room to show the efforts of the Commission to tackle these problems. In addition to the slanted view I find that the author has not cited sources sufficiently, e.g. for the 10% of the budget that is supposed to be subject to corruption.
Before making an attempt at improving the neutrality I wanted to hear the opinion of others here.
-- Drdan 10:55, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
I have restructured the page, edited some of the English, removed passages that did not have cited backing, replaced some terminology with the technically correct version, and added quite a few links. Still I find the language and the article as a whole to be slanted towards the Eurocritical standpoint. The Bonde webpage is references a little too often as well.
-- Drdan 09:30, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
Have rewritten article to make it NPOV. Have changed title for same reason. Also redirected from OLAF to this article. Marcus22 14:01, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Accountability in the European Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 07:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)