![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 16:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Re this sentence
Unless Brutii should have one i, then this should not be on the disambig page.-- TimothyJacobson ( talk) 20:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The article incorrectly does not distinguish cognomen from agnomen. See Roman naming conventions. One Junius might have a cognomen of Brutus but if his son has it then it has become an agnomen not a cognomen. Here it must be an agnomen; we cannot suppose all those Bruti to merit the nickname "stupid." I'd tend to this but it is likely to be a lot of work and I'm on another run. Dave ( talk) 00:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 16:21, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Re this sentence
Unless Brutii should have one i, then this should not be on the disambig page.-- TimothyJacobson ( talk) 20:00, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
The article incorrectly does not distinguish cognomen from agnomen. See Roman naming conventions. One Junius might have a cognomen of Brutus but if his son has it then it has become an agnomen not a cognomen. Here it must be an agnomen; we cannot suppose all those Bruti to merit the nickname "stupid." I'd tend to this but it is likely to be a lot of work and I'm on another run. Dave ( talk) 00:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)