![]() | Brougham Castle is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2017. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 7, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Brougham Castle (pictured) was seized by
Henry III of England in 1264 when the castle's previous owner died during a
rebellion against the king? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 07:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles passes quick-fail assessment. Main review to follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 07:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I've just put the word Picturesque back in, as the relevant section makes the intended artistic meaning clear: "During the late 18th century, the Lake District became a popular visitor attraction and the sensibilities of Romanticism glamorised historic ruins such as Brougham Castle." (It would help if I'd spelt it correctly in the edit summary though!)-- Northernhenge ( talk) 11:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Prior to this edit, the article used a royal visit as evidence that the condition of the castle had improved. The edit removed that implication. Do we know if the king stayed at the castle? If so, I assume it would have been in splendid condition. If he just visited and moved on, it could have been in any condition. If he stayed, I think the edit should be reverted (and saying "stayed at" instead of "visited"). If he just visited, the current version seems OK to me. -- Northernhenge ( talk) 11:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
The template says: "This template is incapable of inflating Capital expenses, government expenses, or the personal wealth and expenditure of the rich." so unfortunately it doesn't seem to apply to Brougham Castle's building costs and probably not to its maintenance costs. -- Northernhenge ( talk) 20:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brougham Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Is it pronounced "brum", "brome", "brug-um", or "broe-um"? Or something else? Please add the pronunciation if possible. 106.68.197.3 ( talk) 06:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Is "the second Roger Clifford" a correct name? I'd change it to "the second Roger de Clifford" at least, but I'm not sure about this either.-- Adûnâi ( talk) 07:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
In this edit I reinstated the names of Vieuxpont's daughters and reinstated a deleted reference. I see the daughters' names, and the reference, have gone again. Does anyone remember why they were removed? I would just put them back, but I'm not about to start an edit war! -- Northernhenge ( talk) 23:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
![]() | Brougham Castle is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 19, 2017. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 7, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Brougham Castle (pictured) was seized by
Henry III of England in 1264 when the castle's previous owner died during a
rebellion against the king? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Featured article |
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 07:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Articles passes quick-fail assessment. Main review to follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 07:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
I've just put the word Picturesque back in, as the relevant section makes the intended artistic meaning clear: "During the late 18th century, the Lake District became a popular visitor attraction and the sensibilities of Romanticism glamorised historic ruins such as Brougham Castle." (It would help if I'd spelt it correctly in the edit summary though!)-- Northernhenge ( talk) 11:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Prior to this edit, the article used a royal visit as evidence that the condition of the castle had improved. The edit removed that implication. Do we know if the king stayed at the castle? If so, I assume it would have been in splendid condition. If he just visited and moved on, it could have been in any condition. If he stayed, I think the edit should be reverted (and saying "stayed at" instead of "visited"). If he just visited, the current version seems OK to me. -- Northernhenge ( talk) 11:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
The template says: "This template is incapable of inflating Capital expenses, government expenses, or the personal wealth and expenditure of the rich." so unfortunately it doesn't seem to apply to Brougham Castle's building costs and probably not to its maintenance costs. -- Northernhenge ( talk) 20:39, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brougham Castle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:59, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Is it pronounced "brum", "brome", "brug-um", or "broe-um"? Or something else? Please add the pronunciation if possible. 106.68.197.3 ( talk) 06:59, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Is "the second Roger Clifford" a correct name? I'd change it to "the second Roger de Clifford" at least, but I'm not sure about this either.-- Adûnâi ( talk) 07:55, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
In this edit I reinstated the names of Vieuxpont's daughters and reinstated a deleted reference. I see the daughters' names, and the reference, have gone again. Does anyone remember why they were removed? I would just put them back, but I'm not about to start an edit war! -- Northernhenge ( talk) 23:22, 19 February 2017 (UTC)