![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both pulling trains (ususally without another loco suggesting they aren't doing rescue work) and running light. Is this something to do with engineering works or are virgin having reliability problems? Plugwash 13:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I think that the articles on the sub-classes should all be merged into the main Class 57 article. This is becuase the sub-class articles mainly duplicate information in the main article. It would be far better to have all the information contained within one article. An example of where this works effectivley is the British Rail Class 47 article. -- Jorvik 11:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Agree - more in line with other articles. Simply south 12:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Should this now be merged with the class 47 article, after all they are historically the same locomotives, rather than a class apart? ( SouthernElectric 14:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC))
This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 57. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rharchive.info/Issue281.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Could the section about direct rail services be updated please a virgin trains no longer exist. Maurice Oly ( talk) 23:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This has been raised a few times as an edit, however the editor has neglected to add a reliable source. Is there a reliable source which can be used to confirm this? Danners430 ( talk) 21:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
I notice that this locomotive has an coupling system at the front (folded up) as well as a traditional chain and hook affair…
Is this a recent addition to all 57’s? 92.40.196.77 ( talk) 09:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
57009 now in two-tone green, & may now be owned by WCRC. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3357780811105648&set=pcb.1459313544860545 . David Biddulph ( talk) 10:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Both pulling trains (ususally without another loco suggesting they aren't doing rescue work) and running light. Is this something to do with engineering works or are virgin having reliability problems? Plugwash 13:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I think that the articles on the sub-classes should all be merged into the main Class 57 article. This is becuase the sub-class articles mainly duplicate information in the main article. It would be far better to have all the information contained within one article. An example of where this works effectivley is the British Rail Class 47 article. -- Jorvik 11:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Agree - more in line with other articles. Simply south 12:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Should this now be merged with the class 47 article, after all they are historically the same locomotives, rather than a class apart? ( SouthernElectric 14:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC))
This article is currently named in accordance the Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Railways naming conventions for British rolling stock allocated a TOPS number. A proposal to change this convention and/or its scope is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#Naming convention, where your comments would be welcome.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on British Rail Class 57. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.rharchive.info/Issue281.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:56, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Could the section about direct rail services be updated please a virgin trains no longer exist. Maurice Oly ( talk) 23:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
This has been raised a few times as an edit, however the editor has neglected to add a reliable source. Is there a reliable source which can be used to confirm this? Danners430 ( talk) 21:49, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
I notice that this locomotive has an coupling system at the front (folded up) as well as a traditional chain and hook affair…
Is this a recent addition to all 57’s? 92.40.196.77 ( talk) 09:49, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
57009 now in two-tone green, & may now be owned by WCRC. https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3357780811105648&set=pcb.1459313544860545 . David Biddulph ( talk) 10:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)