This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buddhism Mid‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tibet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

I've moved this from the spurious Pali title, which is absurd for a Mahayana text. Peter jackson ( talk) 11:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Perhaps it should actually be under the Chinese title. Peter jackson ( talk) 12:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC) reply

I decided to maintain the Sanskrit title as-is, but add Chinese and Japanese titles as well, for reference. This is similar to how other articles are done, allowing for consistency. Thanks! -- Ph0kin ( talk) 10:25, 11 December 2008 (UTC) reply

What about the fact that many/most/all scholars regard the Sanskrit title as spurious & this as being a Chinese work (or maybe Central Asian? Doesn't seem to be mentioned. Peter jackson ( talk) 16:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC) reply