This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This page describes box86 as being better than QEMU by only emulating the guest program, not a whole guest OS. However QEMU also supports this mode of operation ("user-mode emulation"). How do they compare when both are running in this mode? 104.158.234.106 ( talk) 08:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Ok I tried to clear this up. Jerker123 ( talk) 14:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC) reply

QEMU also supports dynamic binary translation, though I'm not sure if it can intercept and translate calls to dynamically loaded libraries. (Hangover is able to do this though, when used with QEMU to run windows software) More detail on what separates box86 from QEMU would probably be beneficial here. 104.158.234.106 ( talk) 08:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC) reply