This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bosnian pyramid claims article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 90 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Bosnian pyramid claims received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bosnia and Herzegovina Low‑importance Bosnian pyramid claims is part of the WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Bosnia and Herzegovina on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Bosnia and HerzegovinaWikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaTemplate:WikiProject Bosnia and HerzegovinaBosnia and Herzegovina articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Archaeology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Geology Talk:Bosnian pyramid claims is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Park Ravne 2 page were merged into Bosnian pyramid claims on 14 April 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

I have helped escuvate this and can confirm the stone arch ways, tunnels, and 90 degree rectangular blocks layout and stacking. Why is this labled natural hills. 2600:387:F:6610:0:0:0:A ( talk) 14:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Go publish that in a peer-reviewed archaeological journal. Until then, it is just a silly claim. -- Hob Gadling ( talk) 15:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

That's the title of an interview by Michael Salla with Osmanagich [1] Doug Weller talk 12:52, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Also see ] https://www.jasoncolavito.com/blog/news-roundup-no-more-aliencon-alternative-archaeology-is-dying-and-more] Doug Weller talk 15:25, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

His PhD thesis must be some read! There's a copy attached to his article as a citation but unfortunately it's in Serbo-Croat/Bosnian. DeCausa ( talk) 17:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

My bad, I’ve got a link somewhere, tomorrow. Doug Weller talk 19:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Might be this one I just found while watching a contest for two places in a West Side production of Mama Mia. [2] Doug Weller talk 19:38, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

[3] Doug Weller talk 19:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply