This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bosnia and Herzegovina鈥揘ATO relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Serbs feel under occupation - they can even not celebrate January 9th as National Day! NATO stole Kosovo and gave it to Albanian Muslims. Bosnia was stolen too - Bosnian Muslims are allied to NATO, not Serbs聽! 鈥斅燩receding unsigned comment added by 84.227.244.217 ( talk) 15:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to NATO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.haaba.com/node/69065When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.鈥 InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Bosnia and Herzegovina鈥揘ATO relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Serbs feel under occupation - they can even not celebrate January 9th as National Day! NATO stole Kosovo and gave it to Albanian Muslims. Bosnia was stolen too - Bosnian Muslims are allied to NATO, not Serbs聽! 鈥斅燩receding unsigned comment added by 84.227.244.217 ( talk) 15:06, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Accession of Bosnia and Herzegovina to NATO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.haaba.com/node/69065When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.鈥 InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)