From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

original research tag

Mhare, it looks like I reverted this edit and this edit just now. The article is indeed described as original scientific research, but it's part of a published journal, hence there's a presumption that journal editors reviewed it before publishing. Internally, that article references the next sentence after the disputed one to an earlier 2009 article by the same author, published in a different publication, and in turn articles from other authors from 1970, 1983, 2000. This makes it likely to be a secondary source. You should probably address any issues with this source separately. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 18:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I have no objections. It's on me. Regards. Mhare ( talk) 20:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

original research tag

Mhare, it looks like I reverted this edit and this edit just now. The article is indeed described as original scientific research, but it's part of a published journal, hence there's a presumption that journal editors reviewed it before publishing. Internally, that article references the next sentence after the disputed one to an earlier 2009 article by the same author, published in a different publication, and in turn articles from other authors from 1970, 1983, 2000. This makes it likely to be a secondary source. You should probably address any issues with this source separately. -- Joy [shallot] ( talk) 18:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC) reply

I have no objections. It's on me. Regards. Mhare ( talk) 20:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook