![]() | Born Pink has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 15, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Per WP:EXPLICITGENRE the album as a whole has to be described as a genre. The National News Quotes member Rose as calling the album a hip-hop base. The artist themselves is a not a reliable source for genre. The article reviewer says songs span disco, rock and ballad - per WP:EXPLICITGENRE this isn't describing the whole body of work as being of those genres. Its saying that some of the songs are of those genres. For example, the two singles are not rock. Therefore, please do not use this source to claim hip-hop, disco, rock or ballad. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 16:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
So shouldn't we remove all the genres? Cause if that is your point then we should remove all of them, there's no source yet that describes the album's primarily genre still, everywhere says its hip hop, pop, pop rock and disco cause that's what the album genre is, the album doesn't have a set genre or is based on one as whole, that's why all of those genres are listed, born pink only have 3 hip hop songs out of 8 songs, the correct genres are K-pop/Hip Hop/Pop Disco/Pop Rock and all of them should be listed, cause born pink doesn't have a set genre, you went with your logic and removed "disco" because the article says it "spans disco, hip hop, pop rock" but then leave "hip hop"? It's hypocrital of you and a whole nonsense, you just can say that you don't want to add a certain genre so people won't see that the artist tried new things?. Lightlylove ( talk) 00:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Hard to Love (Rosè song) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 17#Hard to Love (Rosè song) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
2600:1700:9BF3:220:9DDD:5071:CE01:203A (
talk)
00:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hard to Love (Rosé song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 00:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grnrchst ( talk · contribs) 20:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this on for review, as part of Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon. Apologies that it has taken so long for a review to materialise. Per my usual review style, I'll leave section-by-section comments followed by a check against the GA criteria.
"Blackpink had been working on a new comeback"A comeback usually implies a period of absence, hiatus or critical/commercial failure. What are they coming back from?
"making them the first female K-pop group in history to do so."This doesn't appear to be supported by the source.
"over a long period of time".
"conjured"Very fanciful word to use here. Consider a different word.
"telling their haters and doubters to take a seat"should be in quotation marks, not just "to take a seat". Right now it reads like we're using the terms "haters" and "doubters" in wikivoice.
"All two singles"Sounds a bit funny. Replace with "Both singles".
"where attendees had the opportunity to enjoy photographic moments selected by the members, buy exclusive Blackpink products directly in-store and receive an exclusive gift from Spotify and Blackpink."This reads like an advertisement... Either rewrite this or cut it.
"a reality show on YouTube""reality show" has connotations I'm not sure this meets. Think "YouTube show" would be fine.
"and conclude"Should be "concluded".
"called the album as"The "as" can be dropped.
"English-heavy sound"Reads a bit odd. I understand that the lyrics are English-heavy, not the sound?
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
![]() | Born Pink has been listed as one of the
Music good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 15, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Per WP:EXPLICITGENRE the album as a whole has to be described as a genre. The National News Quotes member Rose as calling the album a hip-hop base. The artist themselves is a not a reliable source for genre. The article reviewer says songs span disco, rock and ballad - per WP:EXPLICITGENRE this isn't describing the whole body of work as being of those genres. Its saying that some of the songs are of those genres. For example, the two singles are not rock. Therefore, please do not use this source to claim hip-hop, disco, rock or ballad. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 16:58, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
So shouldn't we remove all the genres? Cause if that is your point then we should remove all of them, there's no source yet that describes the album's primarily genre still, everywhere says its hip hop, pop, pop rock and disco cause that's what the album genre is, the album doesn't have a set genre or is based on one as whole, that's why all of those genres are listed, born pink only have 3 hip hop songs out of 8 songs, the correct genres are K-pop/Hip Hop/Pop Disco/Pop Rock and all of them should be listed, cause born pink doesn't have a set genre, you went with your logic and removed "disco" because the article says it "spans disco, hip hop, pop rock" but then leave "hip hop"? It's hypocrital of you and a whole nonsense, you just can say that you don't want to add a certain genre so people won't see that the artist tried new things?. Lightlylove ( talk) 00:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
Hard to Love (Rosè song) and has thus listed it
for discussion. This discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 17#Hard to Love (Rosè song) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
2600:1700:9BF3:220:9DDD:5071:CE01:203A (
talk)
00:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hard to Love (Rosé song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 00:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grnrchst ( talk · contribs) 20:34, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
I'll take this on for review, as part of Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon. Apologies that it has taken so long for a review to materialise. Per my usual review style, I'll leave section-by-section comments followed by a check against the GA criteria.
"Blackpink had been working on a new comeback"A comeback usually implies a period of absence, hiatus or critical/commercial failure. What are they coming back from?
"making them the first female K-pop group in history to do so."This doesn't appear to be supported by the source.
"over a long period of time".
"conjured"Very fanciful word to use here. Consider a different word.
"telling their haters and doubters to take a seat"should be in quotation marks, not just "to take a seat". Right now it reads like we're using the terms "haters" and "doubters" in wikivoice.
"All two singles"Sounds a bit funny. Replace with "Both singles".
"where attendees had the opportunity to enjoy photographic moments selected by the members, buy exclusive Blackpink products directly in-store and receive an exclusive gift from Spotify and Blackpink."This reads like an advertisement... Either rewrite this or cut it.
"a reality show on YouTube""reality show" has connotations I'm not sure this meets. Think "YouTube show" would be fine.
"and conclude"Should be "concluded".
"called the album as"The "as" can be dropped.
"English-heavy sound"Reads a bit odd. I understand that the lyrics are English-heavy, not the sound?
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria