This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I'm going to take off the deletion tag, since this controversial short film/music video by a significant artist has been covered by MTV News, Pitchfork, and NME, which are all established independent music media outlets, as well as a blog hosted by NPR (National Public Radio):
http://www.metro.co.uk/metrolife/music/823394-m-i-a-releases-controversial-born-free-music-video
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1637769/20100426/mia__4_.jhtml
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monitormix/2010/04/mia_video_for_born_free_nsfw.html
Praghmatic ( talk) 18:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
It is a single, so why is the page called "Born Free (short film)"? Clif ( talk) 22:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
because at this point the music video is more notable than the song itself 128.189.208.237 ( talk) 00:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
As near as I can tell, there's no good reason to use the term "ginger" here when red-head or red-headed is preferred usage. I'm not going to change it, but it seems a bit odd as it currently is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.128.177.223 ( talk) 19:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Starlancer changed Ian Hamrick quote, but new version of quote didn't match NME ref, so changed it to a quote I saw at that NME page. -- EarthFurst ( talk) 21:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Article says "The video was then re-posted on YouTube by VEVO, ..." I assumed that copy was deleted from YouTube. Is VEVO's copy at http://youtube.com/watch?v=IeMvUlxXyz8 ? (when I look at that page I see "This video contains content from Vevo, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.") -- EarthFurst ( talk) 21:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find the video at Youtube either. I doubt Youtube is actually allowing a repost. Either that or they silently deleted the repost shortly after again. In any case, I don't think it is viewable on Youtube for anyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.146.176.229 ( talk) 17:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Link works fine for me, the video's definitely on youtube and viewable in the United States with a youtube account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.252.187 ( talk) 09:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Do not use sources that are unreliable. Individuals who are not involved in the making of the track, have made questionable claims in the past, and/or peer review in general is not accepted as reliable on wikipedia as it violates WP:Neutrality and these claims are generally considered biased. The article does not suffer without it. Lifebonzza ( talk) 18:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
I'm going to take off the deletion tag, since this controversial short film/music video by a significant artist has been covered by MTV News, Pitchfork, and NME, which are all established independent music media outlets, as well as a blog hosted by NPR (National Public Radio):
http://www.metro.co.uk/metrolife/music/823394-m-i-a-releases-controversial-born-free-music-video
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1637769/20100426/mia__4_.jhtml
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monitormix/2010/04/mia_video_for_born_free_nsfw.html
Praghmatic ( talk) 18:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
It is a single, so why is the page called "Born Free (short film)"? Clif ( talk) 22:02, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
because at this point the music video is more notable than the song itself 128.189.208.237 ( talk) 00:53, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
As near as I can tell, there's no good reason to use the term "ginger" here when red-head or red-headed is preferred usage. I'm not going to change it, but it seems a bit odd as it currently is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.128.177.223 ( talk) 19:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Starlancer changed Ian Hamrick quote, but new version of quote didn't match NME ref, so changed it to a quote I saw at that NME page. -- EarthFurst ( talk) 21:30, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Article says "The video was then re-posted on YouTube by VEVO, ..." I assumed that copy was deleted from YouTube. Is VEVO's copy at http://youtube.com/watch?v=IeMvUlxXyz8 ? (when I look at that page I see "This video contains content from Vevo, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.") -- EarthFurst ( talk) 21:15, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
I couldn't find the video at Youtube either. I doubt Youtube is actually allowing a repost. Either that or they silently deleted the repost shortly after again. In any case, I don't think it is viewable on Youtube for anyone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.146.176.229 ( talk) 17:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Link works fine for me, the video's definitely on youtube and viewable in the United States with a youtube account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.116.252.187 ( talk) 09:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
Do not use sources that are unreliable. Individuals who are not involved in the making of the track, have made questionable claims in the past, and/or peer review in general is not accepted as reliable on wikipedia as it violates WP:Neutrality and these claims are generally considered biased. The article does not suffer without it. Lifebonzza ( talk) 18:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)