This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boom Boom Pow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I found this on FergieBR.com. I think that it's the true single cover. -- TRyudo ( talk) 22:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps it may be but I don't think it is. It looks to fan-made. Anyone could do that on photoshop or even some simple image editing software. Open the image up so that it is large and look down the bottom. It says FergieBr.com which is an unofficial source. The cover on Dip Dive looks more professional although it doesn't have the song title or the band name on it. All you see are the band members heads. Very strange.
Child Funk (
talk)
People keep removing the dipdive.com cover, why? MatthewWaller ( talk) 19:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone's deleted the whole picture now, THANKS ALOTTT!!! MatthewWaller ( talk) 17:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I got a great idea, re-add it. How hard could it be? And whoever deleted it, Why did you? It was posted on dipdive by will.i.am/iamwill —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.221.5.214 ( talk) 07:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
The cover used in the article right now is the official one. The Black Eyed Peas have uploaded it to their official myspace. The Dipdive cover potentially could be the cover for The E.N.D. It looks like more of an album cover than a single! Child Funk ( talk) 09:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I know it's been getting airplay. I have been listening to 2DAY fm and they've played it each night on the Hot 30 pretty much for whole of the past week claiming that it's the new single. But I just don't get the free download on Last Fm? Perhaps it's a promotional single for the album? Surely the record company's wouldn't allow a free download of something they would intend to make money off. It has to be a promo single that may be on the album? Share your thoughts Child Funk ( talk) 08:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it is a single. Will.i.am released it for the fans because he felt it has been so long since they put material out, and they have been waiting patiently. The official single will come out on March 10th, and will follow up by a music video. Thfresh-prince ( talk) 15:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone tell me how the song got to number 21 in the UK singles chart if the single hasn't even been released in the UK, it says nothing about it on the official UK charts website, I'm guessing it's fake. MatthewWaller ( talk) 19:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey guys. I feel as though it's looking a little neglected. At some point I am going to try and re-format it so it has a cleaner appearence. childfunk chat 04:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
There is common misconfusion with the actual musical genre of the song. Currently, the article lists that the song is Electronic-dance. I don't necessarily agree with that. Yes, the song is electronic, but is it primarily dance music? I'm not so sure. Perhaps electronica could be used instead as it is defined as electronic music that is not made entirely for dancing purposes. Personally, I think the genre is electro-hop (meaning the music is electronic with hip hop vocals), some of you probably disagree so share your thoughts! • вяαdcяo chat 10:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
I think it should be placed under the electro-hop genre, being that is the genre of the album. Thfresh-prince ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC).
Is it really necessary to have the lyrics on the page?? 83.70.69.224 ( talk) 20:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Why is the brand of computer in the video clip listed in the description? Is it appropriate? Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising and if no one objects, that I propose it be removed. Lost kafei ( talk) 10:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
The article says there is 1 clean version, but I found 3 versions:
24.56.20.41 ( talk) 20:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Firstly, the censorship section is not clear; it doesn't indicate why there's censorship and any inkling as to what exactly it is about satellite that might be amenable towards becoming censored in the first place.
Did the single even chart or did it see a release in France? Has anybody checked this out? I mean the SNEP chart is one of the most vital one in the world, shouldn't we include it here?? And if it hasn't seen any commercial release in France we should somehow mention it!!
When I go to the source, it shows that Boom Boom Pow is #1, yet, why is it listed as #4 on this article? 68.100.69.171 ( talk) 02:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Surely Bad Lip Reading's Everybody Poops should be mentioned in this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.170.39 ( talk) 02:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.tabmagnetic.com.ar/news/2009-04-09-125When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boom Boom Pow article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
I found this on FergieBR.com. I think that it's the true single cover. -- TRyudo ( talk) 22:04, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Perhaps it may be but I don't think it is. It looks to fan-made. Anyone could do that on photoshop or even some simple image editing software. Open the image up so that it is large and look down the bottom. It says FergieBr.com which is an unofficial source. The cover on Dip Dive looks more professional although it doesn't have the song title or the band name on it. All you see are the band members heads. Very strange.
Child Funk (
talk)
People keep removing the dipdive.com cover, why? MatthewWaller ( talk) 19:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone's deleted the whole picture now, THANKS ALOTTT!!! MatthewWaller ( talk) 17:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
I got a great idea, re-add it. How hard could it be? And whoever deleted it, Why did you? It was posted on dipdive by will.i.am/iamwill —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.221.5.214 ( talk) 07:09, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
The cover used in the article right now is the official one. The Black Eyed Peas have uploaded it to their official myspace. The Dipdive cover potentially could be the cover for The E.N.D. It looks like more of an album cover than a single! Child Funk ( talk) 09:01, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I know it's been getting airplay. I have been listening to 2DAY fm and they've played it each night on the Hot 30 pretty much for whole of the past week claiming that it's the new single. But I just don't get the free download on Last Fm? Perhaps it's a promotional single for the album? Surely the record company's wouldn't allow a free download of something they would intend to make money off. It has to be a promo single that may be on the album? Share your thoughts Child Funk ( talk) 08:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it is a single. Will.i.am released it for the fans because he felt it has been so long since they put material out, and they have been waiting patiently. The official single will come out on March 10th, and will follow up by a music video. Thfresh-prince ( talk) 15:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Someone tell me how the song got to number 21 in the UK singles chart if the single hasn't even been released in the UK, it says nothing about it on the official UK charts website, I'm guessing it's fake. MatthewWaller ( talk) 19:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Hey guys. I feel as though it's looking a little neglected. At some point I am going to try and re-format it so it has a cleaner appearence. childfunk chat 04:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
There is common misconfusion with the actual musical genre of the song. Currently, the article lists that the song is Electronic-dance. I don't necessarily agree with that. Yes, the song is electronic, but is it primarily dance music? I'm not so sure. Perhaps electronica could be used instead as it is defined as electronic music that is not made entirely for dancing purposes. Personally, I think the genre is electro-hop (meaning the music is electronic with hip hop vocals), some of you probably disagree so share your thoughts! • вяαdcяo chat 10:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
I think it should be placed under the electro-hop genre, being that is the genre of the album. Thfresh-prince ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC).
Is it really necessary to have the lyrics on the page?? 83.70.69.224 ( talk) 20:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Why is the brand of computer in the video clip listed in the description? Is it appropriate? Wikipedia is not a forum for advertising and if no one objects, that I propose it be removed. Lost kafei ( talk) 10:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
The article says there is 1 clean version, but I found 3 versions:
24.56.20.41 ( talk) 20:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Firstly, the censorship section is not clear; it doesn't indicate why there's censorship and any inkling as to what exactly it is about satellite that might be amenable towards becoming censored in the first place.
Did the single even chart or did it see a release in France? Has anybody checked this out? I mean the SNEP chart is one of the most vital one in the world, shouldn't we include it here?? And if it hasn't seen any commercial release in France we should somehow mention it!!
When I go to the source, it shows that Boom Boom Pow is #1, yet, why is it listed as #4 on this article? 68.100.69.171 ( talk) 02:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Surely Bad Lip Reading's Everybody Poops should be mentioned in this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.170.39 ( talk) 02:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:30, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Boom Boom Pow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.tabmagnetic.com.ar/news/2009-04-09-125When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)