![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
We should this image: File:Bombardier CRJ-900LR Lufthansa Cityline (LCL) D-ACKG - MSN 15084 - Named Glücksburg (9741131924).jpg
As A) it is still the 900 series. B the livery is a lot nicer and up to date. And C) the angle of the aircraft. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 16:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Gives people a comparison. Well I did just realise I can post them here. I’ll do that. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 17:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
I’ll find an image like that with a different livery. The orange makes the crj-700 look old and man whoever thought that livery was good, goddamn. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I disagree. The livery makes the aircraft look old. It’s outdated. Secondly the side view form the Lufthansa 700. Has a batter view. And with the lovey being mostly white you can see the aircraft in its ‘stock’ colour without any ugly colours on. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
@ N8wilson and N8:How about this one? File:Bombardier CRJ-702 'N546FF' American Eagle ′(14192211342).jpg OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Let’s use this one! I’m into that one man. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 21:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Regarding the livery, it’s old and outdated. Best to keep with the good looking modern liveries. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 21:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Found a 900!! Yes I’m so happy! @ MilborneOne: @ Samf4u:
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
@ MilborneOne: I still disagree, look I like the angle I won’t hide that. But I hate the colour orange on a plane. It just doesn’t bring out the modern vibes. I will still oppose those oranges pictures until we find a good one. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
How about this one?
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay then, I’ll add the image on the. No worries. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 15:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Here are some CRJ900 3/4 views of Mesa Airlines, its largest operator:
With gear/flaps down, I like N914FJ, and N902FJ is really dynamic.-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 20:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
No they’re not any better then the last, mainly the angle. @ MilborenOne: how about this one N915FJ? The American eagle one. Oh again we cannot use defunct airlines, us airways is one. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 08:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC) OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 08:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
No you can’t? I did that for the 757 and if you look at the talk page it’ll tell you otherwise. Look I don’t want to ride doing all this. But the US airways images are bad because of the angling. The American eagle is a very good one. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 11:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
No requirements? So why is it that I get critisied for using a us airwyas 757 as the main image but get denied because the airliner is out of service? Yes, that makes all the sense. But again I disagree with you. Those pictures are bad. Why use an airliner that’s defunct? No point, it’s not like you’ll see the airliner nor a livery similar to it. I’m ending the discussion for the CRJ-700 as the photo was updated so I don’t even know why I’m still here, the image has been updated so that’s all good, I don’t think it should be changed anymore. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Well I don’t think it should be changed until something happens such as a new livery. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
By analogy with Bombardier CRJ100/200, should this article be renamed to something like Bombardier CRJ700/900/1000, because it's not only about the 700? -- Beland ( talk) 01:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
My sources at Leeham news confirm that the Mitsubishi will restart CRJ Series production, is it possible that if the mitsubishi restarted production Mitsubishi will be the new manufacturer of the CRJ Series? BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 21:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
The Source: https://leehamnews.com/2021/07/06/exclusive-mitsubishi-ponders-restarting-crj-production/ BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 21:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
OK but the restart production the new manufacturer is Mitsubishi? BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 06:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
But according to User BilCat:"If you're asking if we will move the article in put Mitsubishi in place of Bombardier in the title, the answer is probably not for many years, if ever. But we will add to the lead and infobox if production is actually restarted" BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 15:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
But in the future when restarting the production of the CRJ Series on Wikipedia will the name Mitsubishi CRJ change instead of the "Bombardier"? BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 16:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Ok Thank you Fnlayson. BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 16:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Delta Air Lines Flight 4951. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Delta Air Lines Flight 4951 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
16:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
My sources in Wikipedia confirmed the article Bombardier CRJ redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ" and Bombardier CRJ700 series redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ700" (example:Bombardier crj1000 redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ1000") BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 16:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
We should this image: File:Bombardier CRJ-900LR Lufthansa Cityline (LCL) D-ACKG - MSN 15084 - Named Glücksburg (9741131924).jpg
As A) it is still the 900 series. B the livery is a lot nicer and up to date. And C) the angle of the aircraft. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 16:44, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Gives people a comparison. Well I did just realise I can post them here. I’ll do that. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 17:04, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
I’ll find an image like that with a different livery. The orange makes the crj-700 look old and man whoever thought that livery was good, goddamn. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:43, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
I disagree. The livery makes the aircraft look old. It’s outdated. Secondly the side view form the Lufthansa 700. Has a batter view. And with the lovey being mostly white you can see the aircraft in its ‘stock’ colour without any ugly colours on. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:46, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
@ N8wilson and N8:How about this one? File:Bombardier CRJ-702 'N546FF' American Eagle ′(14192211342).jpg OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:52, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Let’s use this one! I’m into that one man. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 21:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Regarding the livery, it’s old and outdated. Best to keep with the good looking modern liveries. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 21:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Found a 900!! Yes I’m so happy! @ MilborneOne: @ Samf4u:
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:14, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
@ MilborneOne: I still disagree, look I like the angle I won’t hide that. But I hate the colour orange on a plane. It just doesn’t bring out the modern vibes. I will still oppose those oranges pictures until we find a good one. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:55, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
How about this one?
OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 13:57, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Okay then, I’ll add the image on the. No worries. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 15:23, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Here are some CRJ900 3/4 views of Mesa Airlines, its largest operator:
With gear/flaps down, I like N914FJ, and N902FJ is really dynamic.-- Marc Lacoste ( talk) 20:50, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
No they’re not any better then the last, mainly the angle. @ MilborenOne: how about this one N915FJ? The American eagle one. Oh again we cannot use defunct airlines, us airways is one. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 08:10, 2 April 2019 (UTC) OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 08:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
No you can’t? I did that for the 757 and if you look at the talk page it’ll tell you otherwise. Look I don’t want to ride doing all this. But the US airways images are bad because of the angling. The American eagle is a very good one. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 11:53, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
No requirements? So why is it that I get critisied for using a us airwyas 757 as the main image but get denied because the airliner is out of service? Yes, that makes all the sense. But again I disagree with you. Those pictures are bad. Why use an airliner that’s defunct? No point, it’s not like you’ll see the airliner nor a livery similar to it. I’m ending the discussion for the CRJ-700 as the photo was updated so I don’t even know why I’m still here, the image has been updated so that’s all good, I don’t think it should be changed anymore. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:16, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Well I don’t think it should be changed until something happens such as a new livery. OrbitalEnd48401 ( talk) 14:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
By analogy with Bombardier CRJ100/200, should this article be renamed to something like Bombardier CRJ700/900/1000, because it's not only about the 700? -- Beland ( talk) 01:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
My sources at Leeham news confirm that the Mitsubishi will restart CRJ Series production, is it possible that if the mitsubishi restarted production Mitsubishi will be the new manufacturer of the CRJ Series? BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 21:51, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
The Source: https://leehamnews.com/2021/07/06/exclusive-mitsubishi-ponders-restarting-crj-production/ BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 21:52, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
OK but the restart production the new manufacturer is Mitsubishi? BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 06:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
But according to User BilCat:"If you're asking if we will move the article in put Mitsubishi in place of Bombardier in the title, the answer is probably not for many years, if ever. But we will add to the lead and infobox if production is actually restarted" BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 15:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
But in the future when restarting the production of the CRJ Series on Wikipedia will the name Mitsubishi CRJ change instead of the "Bombardier"? BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 16:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Ok Thank you Fnlayson. BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 16:57, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Delta Air Lines Flight 4951. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Delta Air Lines Flight 4951 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
16:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
My sources in Wikipedia confirmed the article Bombardier CRJ redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ" and Bombardier CRJ700 series redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ700" (example:Bombardier crj1000 redirected as "Mitsubishi CRJ1000") BeirutMa2021 ( talk) 16:31, 25 October 2021 (UTC)