This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a diagram or diagrams of a weapon be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
This page is so technically incorrect it is almost silly. But very impressive attempt to make cobbled formulas and pirated images appear as scientific work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.190.162 ( talk) 14:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bolt thrust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Why is this considered to be a vector? If the direction is implicit in the definition (ie "rearward thrust"), doesn't that make it a scalar? Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a diagram or diagrams of a weapon be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the
Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
This page is so technically incorrect it is almost silly. But very impressive attempt to make cobbled formulas and pirated images appear as scientific work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.45.190.162 ( talk) 14:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bolt thrust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:54, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
Why is this considered to be a vector? If the direction is implicit in the definition (ie "rearward thrust"), doesn't that make it a scalar? Andy Dingley ( talk) 17:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)