Boletus pinophilus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 29, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the widely consumed
porcini
mushroom is often confused with the
fungus
Boletus pinophilus (pictured)? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article on hold. Once the issues below have been dealt with, it can be promoted. Below is how the article compares with the six good article criteria:
Not a bad article, by any means, but does need some work.— J Milburn ( talk) 19:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to add a few comments. Sasata ( talk) 20:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I've passed the article, as I feel that much work has been done, and the article is currently in a good shape. It's by no means perfect, but this is a GA review, not a FAC. I'm leaving the above comments, as there are still things there that can be worked with if anyone is interested in improving the article further. J Milburn ( talk) 21:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Boletus pinophilus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.davidarora.com/arora_california_porcini.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
It says:
"Furthermore, pores should be removed as they contain the highest concentrations of pollutants."
I'm unable to check the source, but I believe this should be "spores". Pores are normally holes, and therefore hollow. Also, I don't know how one would set about removing pores.
MrDemeanour ( talk) 11:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Boletus pinophilus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 29, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the widely consumed
porcini
mushroom is often confused with the
fungus
Boletus pinophilus (pictured)? |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article on hold. Once the issues below have been dealt with, it can be promoted. Below is how the article compares with the six good article criteria:
Not a bad article, by any means, but does need some work.— J Milburn ( talk) 19:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to add a few comments. Sasata ( talk) 20:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
I've passed the article, as I feel that much work has been done, and the article is currently in a good shape. It's by no means perfect, but this is a GA review, not a FAC. I'm leaving the above comments, as there are still things there that can be worked with if anyone is interested in improving the article further. J Milburn ( talk) 21:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Boletus pinophilus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.davidarora.com/arora_california_porcini.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
It says:
"Furthermore, pores should be removed as they contain the highest concentrations of pollutants."
I'm unable to check the source, but I believe this should be "spores". Pores are normally holes, and therefore hollow. Also, I don't know how one would set about removing pores.
MrDemeanour ( talk) 11:01, 15 February 2023 (UTC)