![]() | An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the
Main Page in the "
In the news" section. You can visit
the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from
reliable news sources to include recent events. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boeing Starliner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 30 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
A anon user asserted that the sticky valves were caused by intense storms. This does not appear in any of the references, so I reverted. If it is in fact true, it should be in the paragraph about the test and not in the table entry, and it needs a reference. - Arch dude ( talk) 01:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
The tables are too long for comfort on some displays, and the entries in the "notes" and "remarks" columns are wordy and contain too much detail. An interested reader can go to the linked articles instead. I intend to trim these entries somewhat unless there is an objection. - Arch dude ( talk) 17:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
The last para in the lede tends to grow by accretion as we add a sentence for the latest major development. That last sentence is usually OK for the lede, but the earlier sentences are then not longer important enough for the lede. I intend to trim that paragraph. All of the actual info is still in the body of the article. - Arch dude ( talk) 14:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I removed material in lede that was based on a 13-year-old reference. We know it launches on Atlas V. We know it will never launch on Delta IV. Launch on Falcon 9 is highly unlikely, and launch on Vulcan Centaur is problematical. All of this is described in two sections in the article body. I don't think we need anything but Atlas V in the lede. If things change we can change the article. - Arch dude ( talk) 02:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Has the number of seats changed during development ? Infobox says 7, other places imply 4 or 5. - Rod57 ( talk) 12:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
I removed this:
It is not supported by the reference. The second part looks like Original resarch. Can someone find a reference? - Arch dude ( talk) 20:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Note also that NASA does have a contingency, namely Crew Dragon, so the statement will need to be modified even if we do find a reference. - Arch dude ( talk) 20:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
@ RickyCourtney: I was not objecting to mention of OIG scrutiny. The problem is that the particular comparison was from a 2019 OIG analysis of CCP as a whole, but the sentence in the lede makes it appear that it was directed specifically at Boeing/Starliner. It is a side issue that has been picked up (probably from Wikipedia) by Joey Foust and other journalists. There are very real and very important problems that have required much more scrutiny. I think they are in the Reuters article that Foust referenced. - Arch dude ( talk) 15:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the
Main Page in the "
In the news" section. You can visit
the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from
reliable news sources to include recent events. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Boeing Starliner article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 30 days
![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
A anon user asserted that the sticky valves were caused by intense storms. This does not appear in any of the references, so I reverted. If it is in fact true, it should be in the paragraph about the test and not in the table entry, and it needs a reference. - Arch dude ( talk) 01:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
The tables are too long for comfort on some displays, and the entries in the "notes" and "remarks" columns are wordy and contain too much detail. An interested reader can go to the linked articles instead. I intend to trim these entries somewhat unless there is an objection. - Arch dude ( talk) 17:00, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
The last para in the lede tends to grow by accretion as we add a sentence for the latest major development. That last sentence is usually OK for the lede, but the earlier sentences are then not longer important enough for the lede. I intend to trim that paragraph. All of the actual info is still in the body of the article. - Arch dude ( talk) 14:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I removed material in lede that was based on a 13-year-old reference. We know it launches on Atlas V. We know it will never launch on Delta IV. Launch on Falcon 9 is highly unlikely, and launch on Vulcan Centaur is problematical. All of this is described in two sections in the article body. I don't think we need anything but Atlas V in the lede. If things change we can change the article. - Arch dude ( talk) 02:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
Has the number of seats changed during development ? Infobox says 7, other places imply 4 or 5. - Rod57 ( talk) 12:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
I removed this:
It is not supported by the reference. The second part looks like Original resarch. Can someone find a reference? - Arch dude ( talk) 20:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Note also that NASA does have a contingency, namely Crew Dragon, so the statement will need to be modified even if we do find a reference. - Arch dude ( talk) 20:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
@ RickyCourtney: I was not objecting to mention of OIG scrutiny. The problem is that the particular comparison was from a 2019 OIG analysis of CCP as a whole, but the sentence in the lede makes it appear that it was directed specifically at Boeing/Starliner. It is a side issue that has been picked up (probably from Wikipedia) by Joey Foust and other journalists. There are very real and very important problems that have required much more scrutiny. I think they are in the Reuters article that Foust referenced. - Arch dude ( talk) 15:49, 17 June 2024 (UTC)