![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Let’s See, I Can Talk about: “QWERTY” & QWERTY: Has A Verse: For Us✅ /(As For: God’s, “His: Way: is Perfect✅“) (2ND Samuel. 22:31A)!/✅/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:D240:2630:341E:8109:5B49:E3EA ( talk) 02:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
I think that the products section of this page is pretty much meaningless as it is and should be deleted User:Smoke.E 17:36, 6 January 2007
This article lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.
Wikipedia:Notability_(fiction)#What_Wikipedia_is_not states, "Articles on fiction elements are expected to cover more about "real-world" aspects of the element, such as its development and reception, than "in-universe" details." Currently, this article's content falls into two categories:
I'll take a first run at cleaning this up. As it stands, the various observations ("toned down", "more cartoony", "significantly", etc.) simply have to go, unless there are independent reliable sources making these statements. I wish there was some way I could destroy "Bob you rule." with fire. Unfortunately, all I can do is delete it. - SummerPhD v2.0 14:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Let’s See, I Can Talk about: “QWERTY” & QWERTY: Has A Verse: For Us✅ /(As For: God’s, “His: Way: is Perfect✅“) (2ND Samuel. 22:31A)!/✅/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:D240:2630:341E:8109:5B49:E3EA ( talk) 02:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
I think that the products section of this page is pretty much meaningless as it is and should be deleted User:Smoke.E 17:36, 6 January 2007
This article lacks coverage in independent reliable sources.
Wikipedia:Notability_(fiction)#What_Wikipedia_is_not states, "Articles on fiction elements are expected to cover more about "real-world" aspects of the element, such as its development and reception, than "in-universe" details." Currently, this article's content falls into two categories:
I'll take a first run at cleaning this up. As it stands, the various observations ("toned down", "more cartoony", "significantly", etc.) simply have to go, unless there are independent reliable sources making these statements. I wish there was some way I could destroy "Bob you rule." with fire. Unfortunately, all I can do is delete it. - SummerPhD v2.0 14:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)