This article was nominated for deletion on 26 January 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
If anyone has time please revise this article. It reads more like an advertisement than anything informative. Taco098541 ( talk) 15:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
In recent edit by User:GorillaWarfare I realized that the wording changed from "hundreds of protestors" to "thousands of protestors" despite the fact that the source of that statement also wrote only about "hundreds".
In a similar manner the wording "Many American financial experts warned that ..." was changed to "Many international financial experts warned that...".
It seems to me that there is a back and forth editing going as this reverted a diff that introduced exactly the opposite language.
While counting and numbers are obviously always tricky I believe in the first case it seems easy to settle on hundreds but I am not sure about the second instance. My gut feeling tells me it were indeed international financial experts. Yet I wonder if in doubt we do not need to be specific about where the there criticism was coming from. And I am sure if one would search long enough one would find a reputable source quoting some financial expert not seeing a problem here.
I always appreciated Wikipedia for its effort to convey a neutral point of view and it seems to me that we should put in more effort to resolve such unfortunate editwars. In fact my feeling is if I'd sepend more time I would find more such unfortunate edits. --- Renepick ( talk) 13:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Can anyone add that there is an online bukele tracker that checks for the current status of El Salvador bitcoin. This may have value since the success or failure of the first country to add bitcoin may influence others in their decisions to adopt or avoid bitcoin. 2603:800C:3942:1D00:CCBF:42FA:D29:3DB5 ( talk) 23:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 26 January 2022. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors |
If anyone has time please revise this article. It reads more like an advertisement than anything informative. Taco098541 ( talk) 15:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
In recent edit by User:GorillaWarfare I realized that the wording changed from "hundreds of protestors" to "thousands of protestors" despite the fact that the source of that statement also wrote only about "hundreds".
In a similar manner the wording "Many American financial experts warned that ..." was changed to "Many international financial experts warned that...".
It seems to me that there is a back and forth editing going as this reverted a diff that introduced exactly the opposite language.
While counting and numbers are obviously always tricky I believe in the first case it seems easy to settle on hundreds but I am not sure about the second instance. My gut feeling tells me it were indeed international financial experts. Yet I wonder if in doubt we do not need to be specific about where the there criticism was coming from. And I am sure if one would search long enough one would find a reputable source quoting some financial expert not seeing a problem here.
I always appreciated Wikipedia for its effort to convey a neutral point of view and it seems to me that we should put in more effort to resolve such unfortunate editwars. In fact my feeling is if I'd sepend more time I would find more such unfortunate edits. --- Renepick ( talk) 13:00, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Can anyone add that there is an online bukele tracker that checks for the current status of El Salvador bitcoin. This may have value since the success or failure of the first country to add bitcoin may influence others in their decisions to adopt or avoid bitcoin. 2603:800C:3942:1D00:CCBF:42FA:D29:3DB5 ( talk) 23:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)