This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For context, this page's history:
I am recreating this page because I believe these issues have been addressed. I believe this song's notability has changed since the first few weeks immediately following its release (when the first article failed to demonstrate notability). I believe a standalone article is appropriate because there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article. I believe this new page is a sufficiently-sourced article to demonstrate WP:N and WP:NSONG via WP:GNG.
I've added some context to how I arrived at this decision below. I welcome discussion of any/all of the above and below points! — Shrinkydinks ( talk) 07:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Elaborating on why this page should be re-created: An outline of previous issues with the article that led to deletion, and point-by-point addresses of these concerns:
The October 2018 article attempt:
The December 2018 article attempt:
The April 2019 article attempt:
Context from March 2019:
Elaborating on why this page should be re-created: I believe there are sufficient quality sources on this topic, which support an article of sufficient depth, to merit a standalone page (covering relevant material that could not be condensed into a stub). These sources include
which are all approved on Wikipedia's list of discussed reliable sources. Other reliable sources included in the context section of this article include:
I believe these sources together comprise notability via WP:GNG.
— Shrinkydinks ( talk) 07:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
There are some sources of middling quality in this article. I have included the few of them that there are in the article as a start because I believe they are of high enough quality (defended below). That said, I believe the article could benefit from replacing these sources with ones of higher quality.
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good article. I've reviewed your comments on the talk page and I have to say I agree with you. Cheers..
Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect B**** Lasagna. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 17:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 October 2018. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For context, this page's history:
I am recreating this page because I believe these issues have been addressed. I believe this song's notability has changed since the first few weeks immediately following its release (when the first article failed to demonstrate notability). I believe a standalone article is appropriate because there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article. I believe this new page is a sufficiently-sourced article to demonstrate WP:N and WP:NSONG via WP:GNG.
I've added some context to how I arrived at this decision below. I welcome discussion of any/all of the above and below points! — Shrinkydinks ( talk) 07:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Elaborating on why this page should be re-created: An outline of previous issues with the article that led to deletion, and point-by-point addresses of these concerns:
The October 2018 article attempt:
The December 2018 article attempt:
The April 2019 article attempt:
Context from March 2019:
Elaborating on why this page should be re-created: I believe there are sufficient quality sources on this topic, which support an article of sufficient depth, to merit a standalone page (covering relevant material that could not be condensed into a stub). These sources include
which are all approved on Wikipedia's list of discussed reliable sources. Other reliable sources included in the context section of this article include:
I believe these sources together comprise notability via WP:GNG.
— Shrinkydinks ( talk) 07:13, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
There are some sources of middling quality in this article. I have included the few of them that there are in the article as a start because I believe they are of high enough quality (defended below). That said, I believe the article could benefit from replacing these sources with ones of higher quality.
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good article. I've reviewed your comments on the talk page and I have to say I agree with you. Cheers..
Willbb234 Talk (please {{ ping}} me in replies) 21:16, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect B**** Lasagna. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Lord Bolingbroke ( talk) 17:11, 1 February 2020 (UTC)