From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is a good link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/175 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.204.228.36 ( talk) 08:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Nanotechnology

Hi, under the strictest interpretation nanites specifically ones created in a laboratory are not "biological" and therefore should not be covered under the BWATA. Even if they are capable of self-replication as long as their function is not to attack biological organisms then it is unclear which laws would apply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.190.160.125 ( talk) 19:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Here is a good link: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/175 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.204.228.36 ( talk) 08:28, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Nanotechnology

Hi, under the strictest interpretation nanites specifically ones created in a laboratory are not "biological" and therefore should not be covered under the BWATA. Even if they are capable of self-replication as long as their function is not to attack biological organisms then it is unclear which laws would apply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.190.160.125 ( talk) 19:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook