![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
At the top of the article are maintenance templates {{
cleanup-rewrite}}
and {{
copy edit}}
that contain the "section" parameter. If these issues are limited to the lead section, should these be replaced with {{
lead rewrite}}
? If these issues are NOT limited to the lead section, should the "section" parameter be removed? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
16:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
expert-subject}}
template in the middle of the Ecoregions section. Should a "section" parameter be added to this parameter? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
16:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC){{
expert subject}}
.
GoingBatty (
talk)
00:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC)I hit this thing with a club. Hope you like it. Here are my observations:
Cheers! Lfstevens ( talk) 18:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The deletion and replacement of the NC region map; I don't follow what is going on. Is the problem something that can be settled with a bit of editing rather then deleting the whole map? JonRichfield ( talk) 16:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
No, I wasn't, I had just got my knickers in a twist and was looking at the wrong map. Sorry!!! OK, look, I think you were a little hard on the author; I would have suggested that the map be edited to include NC in the distribution, before actually deleting the whole thing, and given him a couple of weeks' grace. However, no harm done so far (I hope). I have butchered the original map, hoping that he doesn't mind, putting the Pacific and part of the Indian ocean in the centre to make more sense of tectonics and distribution, omitted irrelevant details like Africa and the poles, and filled in a red blotch where NC lies. It is not high-quality cartography, but then it isn't a high-resolution map, and it is not a high resolution subject either. I hope this solution suits both parties. Cheers, JonRichfield ( talk) 08:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The gallery contains one image of "Araucaria columnaris with albatross", which was photographed outside New Caledonia. The image should be replaced with an image showing native New Caledonian habitat containing "Araucaria columnaris with native bird". - Mardus ( talk) 14:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
At the top of the article are maintenance templates {{
cleanup-rewrite}}
and {{
copy edit}}
that contain the "section" parameter. If these issues are limited to the lead section, should these be replaced with {{
lead rewrite}}
? If these issues are NOT limited to the lead section, should the "section" parameter be removed? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
16:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
{{
expert-subject}}
template in the middle of the Ecoregions section. Should a "section" parameter be added to this parameter? Thanks!
GoingBatty (
talk)
16:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC){{
expert subject}}
.
GoingBatty (
talk)
00:44, 27 March 2012 (UTC)I hit this thing with a club. Hope you like it. Here are my observations:
Cheers! Lfstevens ( talk) 18:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The deletion and replacement of the NC region map; I don't follow what is going on. Is the problem something that can be settled with a bit of editing rather then deleting the whole map? JonRichfield ( talk) 16:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
No, I wasn't, I had just got my knickers in a twist and was looking at the wrong map. Sorry!!! OK, look, I think you were a little hard on the author; I would have suggested that the map be edited to include NC in the distribution, before actually deleting the whole thing, and given him a couple of weeks' grace. However, no harm done so far (I hope). I have butchered the original map, hoping that he doesn't mind, putting the Pacific and part of the Indian ocean in the centre to make more sense of tectonics and distribution, omitted irrelevant details like Africa and the poles, and filled in a red blotch where NC lies. It is not high-quality cartography, but then it isn't a high-resolution map, and it is not a high resolution subject either. I hope this solution suits both parties. Cheers, JonRichfield ( talk) 08:05, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
The gallery contains one image of "Araucaria columnaris with albatross", which was photographed outside New Caledonia. The image should be replaced with an image showing native New Caledonian habitat containing "Araucaria columnaris with native bird". - Mardus ( talk) 14:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)