BayardâCondict Building has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 3, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from BayardâCondict Building appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which Bayard and which Condict is the building named after?
By the way, whom is Bayard Street named after? âPreceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.183.231 ( talk) 16:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on BayardâCondict Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk)Â 14:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/BayardâCondict Building; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - pending
Overall:
@
Epicgenius: Good to go after QPQ done. I will note that Earwig's flags a high percentage, but it is just long building names and properly attributed quotes, so all is well. Assuming good faith on the offline hooks, I would reccomdend using either ALT0 or ALT4 as I find those the most interesting.
Schminnte (
talk â˘
contribs) 21:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grungaloo ( talk ¡ contribs) 23:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello again
Epicgenius, I'm picking this review up too. I'll ping you once my review is completed.
grungaloo (
talk) 23:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Refs 9,11,12,20,28,56,60 all good.
Hey Epicgenius, all done. This is a really well written article, only a few minor comments. grungaloo ( talk) 03:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
BayardâCondict Building has been listed as one of the
Art and architecture good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 3, 2024. ( Reviewed version). |
A fact from BayardâCondict Building appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 21 June 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which Bayard and which Condict is the building named after?
By the way, whom is Bayard Street named after? âPreceding unsigned comment added by 38.112.183.231 ( talk) 16:07, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on BayardâCondict Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.â InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk)Â 14:06, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
5x expanded by Epicgenius ( talk). Self-nominated at 14:04, 26 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/BayardâCondict Building; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: - pending
Overall:
@
Epicgenius: Good to go after QPQ done. I will note that Earwig's flags a high percentage, but it is just long building names and properly attributed quotes, so all is well. Assuming good faith on the offline hooks, I would reccomdend using either ALT0 or ALT4 as I find those the most interesting.
Schminnte (
talk â˘
contribs) 21:33, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Grungaloo ( talk ¡ contribs) 23:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello again
Epicgenius, I'm picking this review up too. I'll ping you once my review is completed.
grungaloo (
talk) 23:18, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Refs 9,11,12,20,28,56,60 all good.
Hey Epicgenius, all done. This is a really well written article, only a few minor comments. grungaloo ( talk) 03:50, 3 March 2024 (UTC)