This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of the Espero Convoy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Battle of the Espero Convoy appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 23 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Espero Convoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Joseph is a pen name of Frank Collin, a neo-Nazi author of pseudoscience. For more information, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Are_books_by_an_ex-Nazi_writer_of_fringe_books_on_Atlantis.2C_etc_RS_for_military_history.3F. Parsecboy ( talk) 17:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
@ DagosNavy: I think your cuts were rather harsh, particularly because the British naval movements were coincidental and their context is necessary to explain why they were where they were. Since the Zeffiro was in subsequent operations, it's hardly irrelevant to the header. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 16:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Insist bigod, I challenge you to a duel, conkers at dawn. I don't necessarily want to keep all the circumstantial material in this article since the background and prelude are about the beginning of hostilities but then the convoy was a consequence of them. If you take a dim view of O'Hara and Mattesini it seems odd to base an opinion on them. Where would you put the errant days? Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Does moving the days before and after out of the battle section help? Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 07:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of the Espero Convoy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Battle of the Espero Convoy appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 23 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of the Espero Convoy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 23:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Joseph is a pen name of Frank Collin, a neo-Nazi author of pseudoscience. For more information, see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Are_books_by_an_ex-Nazi_writer_of_fringe_books_on_Atlantis.2C_etc_RS_for_military_history.3F. Parsecboy ( talk) 17:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
@ DagosNavy: I think your cuts were rather harsh, particularly because the British naval movements were coincidental and their context is necessary to explain why they were where they were. Since the Zeffiro was in subsequent operations, it's hardly irrelevant to the header. Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 16:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Insist bigod, I challenge you to a duel, conkers at dawn. I don't necessarily want to keep all the circumstantial material in this article since the background and prelude are about the beginning of hostilities but then the convoy was a consequence of them. If you take a dim view of O'Hara and Mattesini it seems odd to base an opinion on them. Where would you put the errant days? Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Does moving the days before and after out of the battle section help? Regards Keith-264 ( talk) 07:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)