This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Liberty Place Monument article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does it belong in Category:Confederate States of America monuments and memorials and any subcategories of that? Herostratus ( talk) 18:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
So now we see this filed under Category:Destroyed_landmarks_in_Louisiana but the obelisk has not, in fact, been destroyed. It's been removed and put in storage and there's every indication it will be relocated. Am I missing something? -- Editor B ( talk) 16:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Infrogmation: "The Battle of Liberty Place Monument is a memorial" -- really? Magic ♪piano 17:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
What specific problems need to be addressed prompting the "Tone" notice placed by User:Kintetsubuffalo? -- Infrogmation ( talk) 10:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 10:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to change "Sicilian men" to "Italian men" because they weren't all Sicilian; one of them was from the Rome area. Also, Sicily is part of Italy, and it was the Italian government that reacted to the incident, not the Sicilian government. --MopTop ( talk) 13:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with the tone or style of this article. It dispassionately states the facts. "This person said, this, another person said that." Quoting someone in an article is not the same as using an article to express your own opinions, it's merely documenting the fact that there was a controversy. --MopTop ( talk) 05:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Battle of Liberty Place Monument article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Does it belong in Category:Confederate States of America monuments and memorials and any subcategories of that? Herostratus ( talk) 18:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
So now we see this filed under Category:Destroyed_landmarks_in_Louisiana but the obelisk has not, in fact, been destroyed. It's been removed and put in storage and there's every indication it will be relocated. Am I missing something? -- Editor B ( talk) 16:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
@ Infrogmation: "The Battle of Liberty Place Monument is a memorial" -- really? Magic ♪piano 17:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
What specific problems need to be addressed prompting the "Tone" notice placed by User:Kintetsubuffalo? -- Infrogmation ( talk) 10:37, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
-- Kintetsubuffalo ( talk) 10:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to change "Sicilian men" to "Italian men" because they weren't all Sicilian; one of them was from the Rome area. Also, Sicily is part of Italy, and it was the Italian government that reacted to the incident, not the Sicilian government. --MopTop ( talk) 13:50, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
There is nothing wrong with the tone or style of this article. It dispassionately states the facts. "This person said, this, another person said that." Quoting someone in an article is not the same as using an article to express your own opinions, it's merely documenting the fact that there was a controversy. --MopTop ( talk) 05:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)