A fact from Battle of Ali Masjid appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 December 2009 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the highest-ranked British casualty in the 1878 Battle of Ali Masjid suffered a gunshot wound that drove a metal locket with his wife's photograph through his heart? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Asian / British / European / Indian / South Asia This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force British military history task force European military history task force Indian military history task force South Asian military history task force

this book contained a map of the original battle plan on page 30. Sherurcij ^{( speaker for the dead)} 08:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Some of the narrative, particularly in the section "The shooting begins", is a bit confused because the parties are never identified. Mangoe ( talk) 14:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I changed the rank based on Browne's own official despatch viz "No. 24672". The London Gazette. 28 January 1879. David Underdown ( talk) 15:20, 3 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I notice that the other sources also seem to have his first initial wrong, he was J G Maclean, not F G. There does not seem ever to have been an F G Maclean in British service viz http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/exact=F.+G.+Maclean/start=1 versus http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/1879-01-01;1900-12-31/exact=J.+G.+Maclean/start=1 David Underdown ( talk) 15:30, 3 December 2009 (UTC) reply