This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current or recent names are bolded. -- NE2 09:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
According to the infoboxes that I found in the articles listed in this template, the cars are 10 ft 0 in (3,050 mm) wide. What gives? Peter Horn User talk 19:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline ( talk) 15:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
– I was adding the requests page by page, but later I noticed this template. There is no reason to disambiguate these pages, per our guideline "(New York City Subway [car])" is unneeded, as the place to be moved redirect there. Although in some cases this request is unneeded i wanted to search for consensus if necessary. Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
OK we need a break here, I mean, check the opposes they are lame in my opinion. First of all, I requested this in November 4, to date nobody has even take for consideration to create a disambiguation page for B Division, and guess what it still redirected here. Eleven days and nobody has given a real shit about that. And the opposes were because "it may mean multiple things", well, are you going to work on that? The same applies to "Low-V".
Now we have "Deck Roof", "Hi-V", "MS Multi-section car" and "BU cars", and people crying the same: "MS Multi-section car" may refer to "any kind of car". Do we have an article about the French/Mexican/LA, etc. MS Multi-section car, or any other fucking "MS Multi-section car" here? No, if that concept is so ambiguous why it doesn't have a page for other MS Multi-section cars? All those four pages still in red.
We have Bluebird Compartment Car that can be confused (I don't know how) with a company, and now the most stupidiest thing I've heard here "I oppose Q-type Queens car" ( D-type Triplex and Flivver Lo-V are included here). The reason? Nobody has given one, especially because I doubt that "Q-type Queens car" may refer to the cars that Elizabeth II and Margrethe II use to travel, rather than a borough. People here apparently cannot understand in simple terms WP:PRECISION and WP:DAB. "The Day After Tomorrow" is not a concept that is about a film, is about a day that will happens in two days; "Price Tag" is not a concept that is about a song, is about a label; "Rumours" and "The Dark Side of the Moon" are not concepts that are about albums, they mean, respectively, "a piece of purportedly true information that circulates without substantiating evidence" and "the far side of the Moon that is permanently turned away from the Earth", but guess how we work in Wikipedia:
As simple as this. We don't work to make other people life easier, we work here for convenience, we have a MOS, and you are ignoring it. Other people have understand this, why you don't? Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Current or recent names are bolded. -- NE2 09:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
According to the infoboxes that I found in the articles listed in this template, the cars are 10 ft 0 in (3,050 mm) wide. What gives? Peter Horn User talk 19:00, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Not Moved Mike Cline ( talk) 15:11, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
– I was adding the requests page by page, but later I noticed this template. There is no reason to disambiguate these pages, per our guideline "(New York City Subway [car])" is unneeded, as the place to be moved redirect there. Although in some cases this request is unneeded i wanted to search for consensus if necessary. Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
OK we need a break here, I mean, check the opposes they are lame in my opinion. First of all, I requested this in November 4, to date nobody has even take for consideration to create a disambiguation page for B Division, and guess what it still redirected here. Eleven days and nobody has given a real shit about that. And the opposes were because "it may mean multiple things", well, are you going to work on that? The same applies to "Low-V".
Now we have "Deck Roof", "Hi-V", "MS Multi-section car" and "BU cars", and people crying the same: "MS Multi-section car" may refer to "any kind of car". Do we have an article about the French/Mexican/LA, etc. MS Multi-section car, or any other fucking "MS Multi-section car" here? No, if that concept is so ambiguous why it doesn't have a page for other MS Multi-section cars? All those four pages still in red.
We have Bluebird Compartment Car that can be confused (I don't know how) with a company, and now the most stupidiest thing I've heard here "I oppose Q-type Queens car" ( D-type Triplex and Flivver Lo-V are included here). The reason? Nobody has given one, especially because I doubt that "Q-type Queens car" may refer to the cars that Elizabeth II and Margrethe II use to travel, rather than a borough. People here apparently cannot understand in simple terms WP:PRECISION and WP:DAB. "The Day After Tomorrow" is not a concept that is about a film, is about a day that will happens in two days; "Price Tag" is not a concept that is about a song, is about a label; "Rumours" and "The Dark Side of the Moon" are not concepts that are about albums, they mean, respectively, "a piece of purportedly true information that circulates without substantiating evidence" and "the far side of the Moon that is permanently turned away from the Earth", but guess how we work in Wikipedia:
As simple as this. We don't work to make other people life easier, we work here for convenience, we have a MOS, and you are ignoring it. Other people have understand this, why you don't? Tbhotch. ™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:13, 16 November 2012 (UTC)