![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The external link to a free sample of these publications was removed. I'm told that it needs to be included into the editorial, if it's of importance. So I did just that. The linked audiobook is not a commercial offer, so I do feel that this is justified and adds value to the explanations. Audiobookworm 17:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, I frankly think that removing this info (for the second time now...) is unjustified, as having a (free) example of these comedy excerpts adds value. But as you seem to be happy sitting on your high horse and playing police, I'll forget about contributing to the Wiki and let you guys play your own game..... bit of a shame, but my time is too valuable to enter into squibbles of that nature. Have fun! Audiobookworm 00:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
The link in question,
violates Wikipedia:External links guidelines in two ways:
The free audio books are part of the site's commercial promotion strategy to attract buyers. The link does no harm in a talk page discussion, but it does not belong in an encyclopedia article.
There is also a user conflict of interest here, as illustrated by:
Audiobookworm, please read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline to understand what is and is not appropriate encyclopedia editing in your position. Thank you. — Athænara ✉ 12:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The external link to a free sample of these publications was removed. I'm told that it needs to be included into the editorial, if it's of importance. So I did just that. The linked audiobook is not a commercial offer, so I do feel that this is justified and adds value to the explanations. Audiobookworm 17:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, I frankly think that removing this info (for the second time now...) is unjustified, as having a (free) example of these comedy excerpts adds value. But as you seem to be happy sitting on your high horse and playing police, I'll forget about contributing to the Wiki and let you guys play your own game..... bit of a shame, but my time is too valuable to enter into squibbles of that nature. Have fun! Audiobookworm 00:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
The link in question,
violates Wikipedia:External links guidelines in two ways:
The free audio books are part of the site's commercial promotion strategy to attract buyers. The link does no harm in a talk page discussion, but it does not belong in an encyclopedia article.
There is also a user conflict of interest here, as illustrated by:
Audiobookworm, please read the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guideline to understand what is and is not appropriate encyclopedia editing in your position. Thank you. — Athænara ✉ 12:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)